Bloom David C, Christenson Tom E, Manning Scott C, Eksteen Eduard C, Perkins Jonathan A, Inglis Andrew F, Stool Sylvan E
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery University of Washington, Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, 98105, USA.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 May;69(5):657-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.12.006.
To review Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center experience with pediatric airway foreign bodies, and examine the incidence and treatment of laryngeal foreign bodies. To determine if plastic laryngeal foreign bodies present differently than other laryngeal foreign bodies.
A retrospective review of all cases of children (1874 patients) undergoing direct laryngoscopy and/or bronchoscopy from 1st January 1997 to 9th September 2003 at a tertiary care children's hospital. Patients with endoscopically documented laryngeal foreign bodies were identified and the medical record reviewed in more detail. Patient age, gender, foreign body location, foreign body type, duration of foreign body presence, radiographic findings, endoscopic findings and treatment complications were recorded.
One hundred and five aspirated foreign bodies were identified. The nine laryngeal foreign bodies included five clear plastic radiolucent items, two radiolucent food items, and two sharp radioopaque pins. Time to diagnosis and treatment was on average 11.6 days with 17.6 days for thin/plastic foreign bodies and 1.6 days for metal/food foreign bodies.
Laryngeal foreign bodies represent a small portion of all pediatric airway foreign bodies. Difficulty in identifying laryngeal foreign bodies, especially thin, plastic radiolucent foreign bodies can delay treatment. Thin plastic foreign bodies can present without radiographic findings, can be difficult to image during endoscopy and can be particularly difficult to diagnose. A history of choking and vocal changes is associated with laryngeal foreign bodies. Laryngeal foreign bodies should be in the differential diagnosis of all children presenting with atypical upper respiratory complaints especially if a history suggestive of witnessed aspiration and dysphonia can be obtained.
回顾儿童医院及区域医疗中心处理小儿气道异物的经验,研究喉异物的发生率及治疗方法。确定塑料喉异物与其他喉异物的表现是否不同。
对1997年1月1日至2003年9月9日在一家三级儿童专科医院接受直接喉镜检查和/或支气管镜检查的所有儿童病例(1874例患者)进行回顾性研究。确定内镜记录有喉异物的患者,并更详细地查阅病历。记录患者的年龄、性别、异物位置、异物类型、异物存留时间、影像学检查结果、内镜检查结果及治疗并发症。
共识别出105例误吸异物。9例喉异物包括5个透明塑料透光物品、2个透光食物物品和2个不透光尖锐别针。诊断和治疗的平均时间为11.6天,其中薄塑料异物为17.6天,金属/食物异物为1.6天。
喉异物占小儿气道异物的一小部分。识别喉异物存在困难,尤其是薄的、塑料透光异物,可能会延误治疗。薄塑料异物可能没有影像学表现,在内镜检查时难以成像,尤其难以诊断。呛咳史和声音改变与喉异物有关。对于所有出现非典型上呼吸道症状的儿童,尤其是有目击误吸史和声音嘶哑的儿童,应将喉异物纳入鉴别诊断。