Suppr超能文献

奥利司他治疗爱尔兰超重和肥胖患者的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of orlistat for the treatment of overweight and obese patients in Ireland.

作者信息

Lacey L A, Wolf A, O'shea D, Erny S, Ruof J

机构信息

Lacey Solutions Ltd, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Obes (Lond). 2005 Aug;29(8):975-82. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802947.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost-effectiveness of orlistat plus a calorie-controlled diet compared with a calorie-controlled diet alone for the treatment of overweight and obese patients in Ireland.

DESIGN

Economic modelling techniques using published international efficacy data and Irish cost data were used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of orlistat in obese patients when only responders to treatment (ie achieve 5% weight loss after 3 months of treatment) continue orlistat after 3 months. The model incorporated known relationships between weight loss and quality of life (utility) gain, and weight loss and reduction in risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) to predict the impact of weight loss on quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs) gained and on the onset of T2DM. The costs associated with each treatment arm included the acquisition cost of orlistat, cost of a calorie-controlled dietary programme and monitoring and treatment costs associated with T2DM. An Irish health-care perspective was taken for the analysis, based on 2003 costs.

SUBJECTS

Weight loss data on 1386 patients from five pivotal orlistat clinical trials with at least 12 months duration were pooled (two American and three primarily European studies). All the studies were randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentre trials with a similar design. The inclusion criteria were BMI > or =28 kg / m(2), age > or =18 y, no diagnosed T2DM and the ability to lose 2.5 kg in weight during the introductory period.

MEASUREMENTS

Cost effectiveness was modelled from these data and presented as incremental cost per QALY.

RESULTS

When orlistat treatment plus a calorie-controlled diet was compared with a calorie-controlled diet alone, the incremental cost per year was euro 478. The number needed to treat (NNT) to gain one QALY was estimated to be 35. The incremental cost per QALY gained was within the range considered cost-effective at euro 16,954. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated an incremental cost per QALY of euro 11,000-35,000 under a variety of assumptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model suggests that orlistat is effective and cost-effective in obese patients, if after 3 months of treatment, only treatment responders continue treatment.

摘要

目的

评估在爱尔兰,与单纯控制热量饮食相比,奥利司他联合控制热量饮食治疗超重和肥胖患者的成本效益。

设计

采用已发表的国际疗效数据和爱尔兰成本数据的经济建模技术,来估计仅治疗反应者(即治疗3个月后体重减轻5%)在3个月后继续使用奥利司他时,奥利司他在肥胖患者中的成本效益。该模型纳入了体重减轻与生活质量(效用)提高之间以及体重减轻与2型糖尿病(T2DM)风险降低之间的已知关系,以预测体重减轻对获得的质量调整生命年(QALY)以及T2DM发病的影响。每个治疗组的成本包括奥利司他的购置成本、控制热量饮食计划的成本以及与T2DM相关的监测和治疗成本。基于2003年成本,从爱尔兰医疗保健角度进行分析。

对象

汇总了来自五项关键奥利司他临床试验(至少持续12个月)的1386例患者的体重减轻数据(两项美国研究和三项主要欧洲研究)。所有研究均为随机、安慰剂对照、多中心试验,设计相似。纳入标准为BMI≥28 kg/m²、年龄≥18岁、未诊断为T2DM且在导入期能够减重2.5 kg。

测量

根据这些数据对成本效益进行建模,并以每QALY的增量成本表示。

结果

当将奥利司他治疗联合控制热量饮食与单纯控制热量饮食进行比较时,每年的增量成本为478欧元。获得1个QALY所需治疗人数(NNT)估计为35。每获得1个QALY的增量成本在被认为具有成本效益的范围内,为16,954欧元。敏感性分析表明,在各种假设下,每QALY的增量成本为11,000 - 35,000欧元。

结论

我们的模型表明,如果在治疗3个月后,仅治疗反应者继续治疗,奥利司他在肥胖患者中是有效且具有成本效益的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验