Bandara Ranjith, Tisdell Clem
Department of Economics, University of Colombo, P.O. Box 1490, Colombo 3, Sri Lanka.
J Environ Manage. 2005 Jul;76(1):47-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.01.007.
This paper explores the way in which the stated willingness to pay for the conservation of Asian elephants in Sri Lanka varies with hypothetical variations in their abundance. To do that, it relies on results from a sample of residents of Colombo. The willingness to pay function is found to be unusual. It increases at an increasing rate for hypothetical reductions in the elephant population compared to its current level (a level that makes the Asian elephant endangered) and also increases at a decreasing rate for increases in this population from its current level. Rational explanations are given for this relationship. The relationship is, however, at odds with relationships suggested in some of the literature for total economic value as a function of the abundance of a wildlife species. It is suggested that willingness to pay for conservation of a species rationally includes a strategic element and may not always measure the total economic value of a species. Nevertheless, willingness to pay is still policy relevant in such cases.
本文探讨了斯里兰卡居民对亚洲象保护的既定支付意愿如何随其数量的假设变化而变化。为此,它依赖于科伦坡居民样本的结果。研究发现支付意愿函数不同寻常。与当前水平(使亚洲象处于濒危状态的水平)相比,假设大象数量减少时,支付意愿以递增速率增加;而当大象数量从当前水平增加时,支付意愿以递减速率增加。文中给出了这种关系的合理解释。然而,这种关系与一些文献中提出的作为野生动物物种数量函数的总经济价值的关系不一致。研究表明,为物种保护的支付意愿合理地包含一个战略要素,可能并不总是衡量一个物种的总经济价值。尽管如此,在这种情况下,支付意愿仍然与政策相关。