Williams Paul D, Day Troy, Cameron Erin
Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, 25 Harbord Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G5, Canada.
Evolution. 2005 Mar;59(3):492-9.
The prevailing viewpoint in the study of sperm competition is that male sperm-allocation strategies evolve in response to the degree of sperm competition an ejaculate can expect to experience within a given mating. If males cannot assess the degree of sperm competition their ejaculate will face and/or they are unable to facultatively adjust sperm investment in response to perceived levels of competition, high sperm allocation (per mating) is predicted to evolve in the context of high sperm competition. An implicit assumption of the framework used to derive this result is that the degree of sperm competition is unaffected by changes in sperm-allocation strategies. We present theory based on an alternative perspective, in which the degree of sperm competition and the sperm-allocation strategy are coupled traits that coevolve together. Our rationale is that the pattern of sperm allocation in the population will, in part, determine the level of sperm competition by affecting the number of ejaculates per female in the population. In this setting, evolution in sperm-allocation strategies is driven by changes in underlying environmental parameters that influence both the degree of sperm competition and sperm allocation. This change in perspective leads to predictions that are qualitatively different from those of previous theory.
精子竞争研究中的主流观点是,雄性的精子分配策略会根据一次射精在特定交配中可能面临的精子竞争程度而进化。如果雄性无法评估其射精将面临的精子竞争程度,和/或它们无法根据感知到的竞争水平灵活调整精子投入,那么在高精子竞争的情况下,预计会进化出高精子分配(每次交配)。用于得出这一结果的框架的一个隐含假设是,精子竞争程度不受精子分配策略变化的影响。我们基于另一种观点提出理论,即精子竞争程度和精子分配策略是共同进化的耦合性状。我们的理由是,种群中的精子分配模式将部分地通过影响种群中每个雌性的射精数量来决定精子竞争水平。在这种情况下,精子分配策略的进化是由影响精子竞争程度和精子分配的潜在环境参数的变化驱动的。这种观点的转变导致了与先前理论在性质上不同的预测。