Suppr超能文献

末次月经回忆日期与前瞻性记录日期的比较。

A comparison of recalled date of last menstrual period with prospectively recorded dates.

作者信息

Wegienka Ganesa, Baird Donna Day

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Research Epidemiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005 Apr;14(3):248-52. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.248.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Women are often asked to recall the first day of their last menstrual period (LMP date) in a clinic setting (i.e., pregnancy dating, x-rays). There are no data supporting the validity of these reports.

METHODS

Using data from a group of 385 women ages 35-49 from a larger cohort study in the Washington, DC, area, we constructed menstrual segments from a prospective daily menstrual record. We then compared the first day of a menstrual segment to a woman's recalled LMP date at a subsequent study-related clinic appointment to assess the accuracy of recall.

RESULTS

More than half of the women (56%) accurately recalled their LMP date; 74% were within 1 day, and 81% were within 2 days. Women tended to underreport (25%) the length of time since their last menstrual period rather than overreport the length of time (19%). Recall accuracy did not vary significantly with education or by whether the woman usually recorded her menstrual cycle when not in the study. As one might expect, women with a shorter recall duration tended to report more accurately.

DISCUSSION

Women appear to recall their LMP dates fairly accurately, but inaccurate recall was not random. When length of recall was 3 weeks or longer, women tended to overestimate the time since LMP. This suggests that gestational age calculated from LMP date will tend to be overestimated. Most women can recall the date of their LMP reasonably well regardless of their education and whether they usually record their LMP dates.

摘要

背景

在诊所环境中(如确定孕周、进行X光检查时),经常会要求女性回忆其末次月经首日(LMP日期)。目前尚无数据支持这些报告的有效性。

方法

利用来自华盛顿特区地区一项更大队列研究中的385名年龄在35 - 49岁女性的数据,我们根据前瞻性每日月经记录构建月经周期段。然后,我们将月经周期段的首日与女性在后续与研究相关的诊所预约时回忆的LMP日期进行比较,以评估回忆的准确性。

结果

超过半数的女性(56%)准确回忆了她们的LMP日期;74%的人误差在1天以内,81%的人误差在2天以内。女性倾向于少报自末次月经以来的时间长度(25%),而非多报时间长度(19%)。回忆准确性在不同教育程度的女性或在非研究期间是否通常记录月经周期的女性中并无显著差异。正如人们所预期的,回忆间隔较短的女性往往报告得更准确。

讨论

女性似乎能相当准确地回忆她们的LMP日期,但不准确的回忆并非随机发生。当回忆间隔为3周或更长时间时,女性往往会高估自末次月经以来的时间。这表明根据LMP日期计算的孕周往往会被高估。大多数女性无论教育程度如何以及是否通常记录LMP日期,都能较好地回忆起LMP日期。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验