Lazar Tibor P, Berry Clifford R, deHaan Jacek J, Peck Jeffrey N, Correa Maria
Affiliated Veterinary Specialists, Maitland, FL 32751, USA.
Vet Surg. 2005 Mar-Apr;34(2):133-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2005.00021.x.
Comparison of 2 methods of surgical management of cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) injury in large-breed dogs using a radiographic osteoarthrosis (OA) scoring system.
Retrospective study.
Client-owned dogs (n=66).
Radiographs were evaluated from dogs weighing >/=22.7 kg, with surgical management of CCL rupture using extracapsular repair (ECR) or tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO). Radiographs were taken immediately before surgery and >/=12 months later. An OA score was assigned to each set of radiographs taken at the preoperative and final examinations by evaluating 32 specific features of stifle OA. The difference between preoperative and final OA scores were subtracted and 2 final score categories of a change </=5 or >5 were created. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the effect of right versus left pelvic limb, age, preoperative weight, postoperative weight, days from surgery until final radiographic recheck, cranial cruciate status at surgery, medial meniscus status at surgery, and ECR versus TPLO.
The ECR group had 27 stifles (22 dogs) and the TPLO group had 52 stifles (44 dogs). ECR dogs had a preoperative weight of 33.4+/-9.3 kg (range 22.7-54.1 kg) and a preoperative OA score of 13.0+/-8.4 (range 1-34) compared with TPLO dogs that had a preoperative weight of 38.9+/-9.1 kg (range 25-63.9 kg) and preoperative OA score of 15.9+/-8.4 (range 4-44). Postoperative weights for ECR and TPLO dogs were 33.6+/-9 kg (range 21.8-54.6 kg) and 39.4+/-10.1 kg (range 24-72 kg), respectively. Final OA scores were: ECR dogs, 26.3+/-10.8 (range, 10-54); TPLO dogs, 23.3+/-9.5 (range, 12-50). Dogs with a final change in OA score of >/=6 were 5.78 times more likely to have had ECR compared with those that had TPLO as stabilization procedure (odds ratio=5.78; Log-likelihood test P-value=.025). Other dependent variables were not significant.
Based on logistic regression analysis, dogs with larger OA score differences were 5.78 times more likely to have had ECR than TPLO.
Prospective, randomized surgical trials with pre-defined objective measures would be required to further evaluate the clinical importance of these preliminary findings which suggest that TPLO may help stabilize the cranial tibial thrust as originally proposed.
使用放射影像学骨关节炎(OA)评分系统比较大型犬颅交叉韧带(CCL)损伤的两种手术治疗方法。
回顾性研究。
客户拥有的犬只(n = 66)。
对体重≥22.7 kg的犬只进行放射影像学评估,这些犬只因CCL断裂接受了关节囊外修复(ECR)或胫骨平台水平截骨术(TPLO)的手术治疗。在手术前及至少12个月后拍摄放射影像。通过评估 stifle OA的32个特定特征,为术前和最终检查时拍摄的每组放射影像指定一个OA评分。用术前和最终OA评分的差值相减,创建了最终评分变化≤5或>5的两个类别。使用逻辑回归模型评估右后肢与左后肢、年龄、术前体重、术后体重、从手术到最终放射影像复查的天数、手术时的颅交叉韧带状态、手术时的内侧半月板状态以及ECR与TPLO的影响。
ECR组有27个 stifle(22只犬),TPLO组有52个 stifle(44只犬)。ECR犬术前体重为33.4±9.3 kg(范围22.7 - 54.1 kg),术前OA评分为13.0±8.4(范围1 - 34),而TPLO犬术前体重为38.9±9.1 kg(范围25 - 63.9 kg),术前OA评分为15.9±8.4(范围4 - 44)。ECR和TPLO犬的术后体重分别为33.6±9 kg(范围21.8 - 54.6 kg)和39.4±10.1 kg(范围24 - 72 kg)。最终OA评分分别为:ECR犬,26.3±10.8(范围,10 - 54);TPLO犬,23.3±9.5(范围,12 - 50)。与接受TPLO作为稳定手术的犬相比,最终OA评分变化≥6的犬接受ECR的可能性高5.78倍(优势比 = 5.78;对数似然检验P值 = 0.025)。其他因变量不显著。
基于逻辑回归分析,OA评分差异较大的犬接受ECR的可能性比TPLO高5.78倍。
需要进行具有预先定义客观指标的前瞻性、随机手术试验,以进一步评估这些初步发现的临床重要性,这些发现表明TPLO可能如最初所提出的那样有助于稳定胫骨前向推力。