Au Kevin K, Gordon-Evans Wanda J, Dunning Dianne, O'Dell-Anderson Kristen J, Knap Kim E, Griffon Dominique, Johnson Ann L
Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61802, USA.
Vet Surg. 2010 Feb;39(2):173-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2009.00628.x.
OBJECTIVES: To compare short- and long-term functional and radiographic outcome of cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) injury in dogs treated with postoperative physical rehabilitation and either tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) or lateral fabellar suture stabilization (LFS). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational clinical study. ANIMALS: Medium to large breed dogs with naturally occurring CrCL injury (n=65). METHODS: Dogs with CrCL injury were treated with either TPLO or LFS and with identical physical rehabilitation regimes postoperatively. Limb peak vertical force (PVF) was measured preoperatively and at 3, 5, and 7 weeks, and 6 months and 24 months postoperatively. Stifles were radiographically assessed for osteoarthrosis (OA) preoperatively and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Thirty-five dogs had LFS and 30 dogs had TPLO. Radiographic OA scores were significantly increased at 24 months compared with preoperative scores in all dogs. Radiographic OA scores preoperatively and at 24 months were not significantly different between treatment groups. PVF was significantly increased from preoperative to 24 months among both treatment groups but not significantly different between treatment groups preoperatively or at 3, 5, 7 weeks, 6, or 24 months. CONCLUSION: No significant difference in outcome as determined by ground reaction forces or radiographic OA scores were found between dogs with CrCL injury treated with LFS or TPLO. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: LFS and TPLO remain good options for stabilizing stifles with CrCL injury with all dogs showing significant functional improvement. This study does not support the superiority of either surgical technique.
目的:比较接受术后物理康复治疗的犬颅交叉韧带(CrCL)损伤采用胫骨平台水平截骨术(TPLO)或外侧腓骨缝合固定术(LFS)治疗后的短期和长期功能及影像学结果。 研究设计:前瞻性观察性临床研究。 动物:患有自然发生的CrCL损伤的中大型犬(n = 65)。 方法:患有CrCL损伤的犬接受TPLO或LFS治疗,并在术后采用相同的物理康复方案。术前以及术后3周、5周、7周、6个月和24个月测量肢体垂直峰值力(PVF)。术前和术后24个月对膝关节进行骨关节炎(OA)的影像学评估。 结果:35只犬接受LFS治疗,30只犬接受TPLO治疗。与所有犬的术前评分相比,24个月时的影像学OA评分显著增加。治疗组之间术前和24个月时的影像学OA评分无显著差异。两个治疗组从术前到24个月PVF均显著增加,但术前或术后3周、5周、7周、6个月或24个月时治疗组之间无显著差异。 结论:接受LFS或TPLO治疗的CrCL损伤犬在由地面反作用力或影像学OA评分所确定的结果方面无显著差异。 临床意义:LFS和TPLO仍然是稳定CrCL损伤膝关节的良好选择,所有犬均显示出显著的功能改善。本研究不支持任何一种手术技术的优越性。
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere. 2015
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere. 2011
Animals (Basel). 2025-4-3
Vet Med (Praha). 2022-2-6
Animals (Basel). 2023-11-8