Earley L E
School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jun 15;116(12 Pt 2):1080-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-116-12-1080.
Considerable attention is being directed from within the discipline of internal medicine to a perceived need for changes in the curriculum for postgraduate training of the internist. Much of this attention has been focused on the training required to properly prepare the general internist for the evolving system of health care. A proposal is presented to change the pattern of training of both the general internist and the medical subspecialist. After 2 years of core training, the general internist would enter 2 additional years of training that would include new material and additional experience in areas such as ambulatory and continuity care. After the core experience, the subspecialist would begin training in the subspecialty. The general internist would be certified as such, and the subspecialist would be certified only in the subspecialty. The proposal is based on the assumptions that 1) more general physicians are needed to meet the nation's health care needs; 2) more time will be required to properly train the general internist; 3) all of the additional and expanded training experiences for the generalist are not essential for training the subspecialist; and 4) the generalists of the future will not come from the ranks of subspecialists. The training needs of the general internist and the subspecialist should be viewed as separate, and curriculum changes should be considered without the restrictions of current patterns of training.
内科医学领域正在高度关注内科医生研究生培训课程变革的迫切需求。这种关注大多集中在为使普通内科医生适应不断发展的医疗保健系统而所需的培训上。本文提出一项建议,旨在改变普通内科医生和医学专科医生的培训模式。经过两年的核心培训后,普通内科医生将进入另外两年的培训,内容包括门诊和连续性护理等领域的新内容和更多经验。在完成核心培训后,专科医生将开始专科培训。普通内科医生将获得相应认证,而专科医生仅在其专科领域获得认证。该建议基于以下假设:1)需要更多的普通医生来满足国家的医疗保健需求;2)需要更多时间来恰当地培训普通内科医生;3)普通医生所有额外和扩展的培训经历对专科医生的培训并非必不可少;4)未来的普通医生不会来自专科医生队伍。应将普通内科医生和专科医生的培训需求视为相互独立的,并且在考虑课程变革时不应受当前培训模式的限制。