Behrem Senija, Zarkovic Kamelija, Eskinja Neven, Jonjic Nives
Department of Pathology, Rijeka University School of Medicine, Brace Branchetta 20, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.
Croat Med J. 2005 Jun;46(3):417-22.
To compare endoglin (CD105) and the pan-endothelial marker CD31 in the assessment of angiogenesis in glioblastoma and to evaluate their values in the prognosis of this malignancy.
Forty-six cases of glioblastoma were included in this retrospective study. All cases were immunohistochemically stained for endoglin (CD105), CD31, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and MIB-1 (Ki67). In order to assess microvessel density, positively stained microvessels were counted for each specimen in predominantly vascular areas (hot spot) at x400 magnification. The intensity of VEGF staining was scored on a three-tiered scale. The proliferation index was expressed as a percentage of Ki67 positive cells.
Median CD105 microvessel density (median 49 microvessels/field, range 27-99) was significantly higher than median CD31 microvessel density (median 37 microvessels/field, range 12-76). CD105 microvessel density was more closely correlated with VEGF (Spearman's rho=0.421, P=0.003) than with CD31 microvessel density (rho=0.330, P=0.024). The proliferation index was significantly associated with CD105 microvessel density (Pearson's r=0.323, P=0.028), whereas correlation could not be observed with CD31 microvessel density (r=0.219, P=0.142). Finally, patients with lower CD105 microvessel density had a longer survival than those with higher CD105 microvessel density (P=0.045), whereas CD31 microvessel density had no influence on the survival time (P=0.340).
CD105 is a more sensitive marker than CD31 in the evaluation of angiogenesis in glioblastoma. Our study is the first report of the better prognostic significance of angiogenesis evaluated with CD105 rather than with CD31 in glioblastoma.
比较内皮糖蛋白(CD105)和全内皮标志物CD31在评估胶质母细胞瘤血管生成中的作用,并评估它们在这种恶性肿瘤预后中的价值。
本回顾性研究纳入了46例胶质母细胞瘤病例。所有病例均进行了内皮糖蛋白(CD105)、CD31、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)和MIB-1(Ki67)的免疫组织化学染色。为了评估微血管密度,在400倍放大倍数下,对每个标本主要血管区域(热点)中阳性染色的微血管进行计数。VEGF染色强度按三级评分。增殖指数以Ki67阳性细胞的百分比表示。
CD105微血管密度中位数(中位数49个微血管/视野,范围27 - 99)显著高于CD31微血管密度中位数(中位数37个微血管/视野,范围12 - 76)。CD105微血管密度与VEGF的相关性(Spearman等级相关系数ρ = 0.421,P = 0.003)比与CD31微血管密度的相关性(ρ = 0.330,P = 0.024)更强。增殖指数与CD105微血管密度显著相关(Pearson相关系数r = 0.323,P = 0.028),而与CD31微血管密度未观察到相关性(r = 0.219,P = 0.142)。最后,CD105微血管密度较低的患者生存期比CD105微血管密度较高的患者长(P = 0.045),而CD31微血管密度对生存时间无影响(P = 0.340)。
在评估胶质母细胞瘤血管生成方面,CD105是比CD31更敏感的标志物。我们的研究是首次报道用CD105而非CD31评估的血管生成在胶质母细胞瘤中具有更好的预后意义。