• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)的免疫组化表达与肾细胞癌中的微血管密度不相关。

Immunohistochemical expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) does not correlate with microvessel density in renal cell carcinoma.

作者信息

Raica M, Cimpean A M, Anghel A

机构信息

Department of Histology & Cytology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.

出版信息

Neoplasma. 2007;54(4):278-84.

PMID:17822316
Abstract

The aim of present study was to investigate the relationship between the immunohistochemical expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microvessel density (MVD) assessed by CD31 and endoglin (CD105) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Specimens from 45 cases of RCC. were formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded, and sections were stained with H&E. Additional sections from each case were stained for VEGF, CD31, CD105, and alpha smooth muscle cell actin (SMA). VEGF immunohistochemical expression was estimated as negative (0), weak positive (+1), moderate positive (+2), and intense positive (+3). Microvessel density (MVD) was estimated on 5 hot spots (x400) from each case, and the arithmetic media was the final result. MVD was separately calculated on slides stained with CD31 and CD105. The rate between mature and immature blood vessels was calculated on slides stained with CD31/CD105/SMA. Statistic analysis was performed with SPSS10.0. The immunoreaction for VEGF was positive in epithelial cells of the renal tubules, and occasionally, in endothelial cells. In RCC, tumor cells were positive in 34 from 45 cases (75.5%). 11 cases were negative, 14 were slightly positive (+1), 13 moderate (+2), and 7 intense (+3). No relationship was found between the expression of VEGF and pathological form and nuclear grade, excepting for the chromophilic variant (3 cases, all positive). CD31 was positive in all cases, and CD105 in 39 cases. The mean values of MVD on slides stained for CD31 and CD105 were: 31.68 (range 9.8-60.2)/20.66 (range 4.2-52.8). The rate CD31/SMA positive blood vessels was 1/0.62. VEGF was expressed in 75.5% of 45 cases with RCC, and the mean value of MVD CD31/CD105 was 31.68/20.66. The immunohistochemical expression of VEGF does not correlate with MVD performed on slides stained for both CD31 and endoglin. The majority of blood vessels in the tumor area are of mature type, with perivascular cells positive for SMA.

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨肾细胞癌(RCC)中血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)的免疫组化表达与通过CD31和内皮糖蛋白(CD105)评估的微血管密度(MVD)之间的关系。收集45例肾细胞癌标本,用福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋,切片进行苏木精-伊红(H&E)染色。每例标本的其他切片分别进行VEGF、CD31、CD105和α平滑肌肌动蛋白(SMA)染色。VEGF免疫组化表达评估为阴性(0)、弱阳性(+1)、中度阳性(+2)和强阳性(+3)。从每例标本的5个热点区域(×400)估计微血管密度(MVD),取算术平均值作为最终结果。分别在CD31和CD105染色的玻片上计算MVD。在CD31/CD105/SMA染色的玻片上计算成熟血管与未成熟血管的比例。使用SPSS10.0进行统计学分析。VEGF的免疫反应在肾小管上皮细胞中呈阳性,偶尔在内皮细胞中也呈阳性。在肾细胞癌中,45例中有34例(75.5%)肿瘤细胞呈阳性。11例为阴性,14例为弱阳性(+1),13例为中度阳性(+2),7例为强阳性(+3)。除嗜色变体(3例,均为阳性)外,未发现VEGF表达与病理类型和核分级之间存在相关性。所有病例CD31均呈阳性,39例CD105呈阳性。CD31和CD105染色玻片上MVD的平均值分别为:31.68(范围9.8 - 60.2)/20.66(范围4.2 - 52.8)。CD31/SMA阳性血管的比例为1/0.62。45例肾细胞癌中有75.5%表达VEGF,CD31/CD105的MVD平均值为31.68/20.66。VEGF的免疫组化表达与在CD31和内皮糖蛋白染色玻片上进行的MVD无关。肿瘤区域的大多数血管为成熟型,血管周围细胞SMA呈阳性。

相似文献

1
Immunohistochemical expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) does not correlate with microvessel density in renal cell carcinoma.血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)的免疫组化表达与肾细胞癌中的微血管密度不相关。
Neoplasma. 2007;54(4):278-84.
2
[Relevance of Endoglin (CD105) VEGF and p53 with invasion metastasis and prognosis of laryngeal carcinoma].[内皮糖蛋白(CD105)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)和p53与喉癌侵袭转移及预后的相关性]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Dec;21(24):1114-7.
3
Independent prognostic relevance of microvessel density in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and associations between CD31, CD105, p53 status, and angiogenic marker expression: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study.晚期上皮性卵巢癌中微血管密度的独立预后相关性以及CD31、CD105、p53状态与血管生成标志物表达之间的关联:一项妇科肿瘤学组研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Mar;112(3):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.11.030. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
4
Endoglin is a better marker than CD31 in evaluation of angiogenesis in glioblastoma.在评估胶质母细胞瘤血管生成方面,内皮糖蛋白是比CD31更好的标志物。
Croat Med J. 2005 Jun;46(3):417-22.
5
Prognostic significance of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.血管内皮生长因子表达在透明细胞肾细胞癌中的预后意义
Pathol Res Pract. 2007;203(2):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2006.12.002.
6
A comparison of the vascular density of VEGF expression with microvascular density determined with CD34 and CD31 staining and conventional prognostic markers in renal cell carcinoma.肾细胞癌中VEGF表达的血管密度与通过CD34和CD31染色测定的微血管密度及传统预后标志物的比较。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;39(3):691-8. doi: 10.1007/s11255-006-9123-4. Epub 2006 Dec 19.
7
Morphometric and immunohistochemical study of angiogenic marker expressions in invasive ductal carcinoma of human breast.人乳腺浸润性导管癌中血管生成标志物表达的形态计量学和免疫组织化学研究
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2009 Aug;68(3):144-55.
8
Density of microvessels positive for CD105 (endoglin) is related to prognosis in meningiomas.CD105(内皮糖蛋白)阳性微血管密度与脑膜瘤的预后相关。
Acta Neuropathol. 2007 Aug;114(2):147-56. doi: 10.1007/s00401-007-0251-4. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
9
Assessment of the prognostic significance of endoglin (CD105) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using automated image analysis.应用自动化图像分析评估内皮糖蛋白(CD105)在透明细胞肾细胞癌中的预后意义。
Hum Pathol. 2012 Jul;43(7):1037-43. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.08.012. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
10
Comparative analysis of COX-2, vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density in human renal cell carcinomas.人肾细胞癌中COX-2、血管内皮生长因子及微血管密度的比较分析
Histopathology. 2004 Dec;45(6):603-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.02019.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of HIF-1α, LOX and ITGA5 Synergistic Interaction in the Tumor Microenvironment on Colorectal Cancer Prognosis.肿瘤微环境中HIF-1α、LOX和ITGA5协同相互作用对结直肠癌预后的影响
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 14;15(2):184. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15020184.
2
The Mutually Mediated Chloride Intracellular Channel Protein 1 (CLIC1) Relationship between Malignant Cells and Tumor Blood Vessel Endothelium Exhibits a Significant Impact on Tumor Angiogenesis, Progression, and Metastasis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC).相互介导的氯离子细胞内通道蛋白1(CLIC1)在肾透明细胞癌(ccRCC)中,恶性细胞与肿瘤血管内皮之间的关系对肿瘤血管生成、进展及转移具有显著影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 3;14(23):5981. doi: 10.3390/cancers14235981.
3
Heterogeneity of Platelet Derived Growth Factor Pathway Gene Expression Profile Defines Three Distinct Subgroups of Renal Cell Carcinomas.血小板衍生生长因子通路基因表达谱的异质性将肾细胞癌分为三个不同的亚群。
Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2022 Jul-Aug;19(4):477-489. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20334.
4
Expression of angiogenic markers in jawbones and femur in a rat model treated with zoledronic acid.唑来膦酸治疗大鼠模型中颌骨和股骨中成血管标志物的表达。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05900-5.
5
DCE-MRI in Glioma, Infiltration Zone and Healthy Brain to Assess Angiogenesis: A Biopsy Study.DCE-MRI 评估胶质瘤、浸润带和正常脑区血管生成:一项活检研究。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2021 Dec;31(4):1049-1058. doi: 10.1007/s00062-021-01015-3. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
6
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor as an Angiogenic Marker in Malignant Astrocytoma and Oligodendroglioma: An Indian Scenario.血管内皮生长因子作为恶性星形细胞瘤和少突胶质细胞瘤血管生成标志物:印度的情况
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Feb;11(2):EC05-EC07. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24353.9331. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
7
Evidence Supporting a Lymphatic Endothelium Origin for Angiomyolipoma, a TSC2(-) Tumor Related to Lymphangioleiomyomatosis.支持血管平滑肌脂肪瘤起源于淋巴管内皮的证据,血管平滑肌脂肪瘤是一种与淋巴管平滑肌瘤病相关的TSC2缺失肿瘤。
Am J Pathol. 2016 Jul;186(7):1825-1836. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
8
Evaluation of Endoglin as an Angiogenesis Marker in Glioblastoma.内皮糖蛋白作为胶质母细胞瘤血管生成标志物的评估
Iran J Pathol. 2015 Spring;10(2):89-96.
9
Different approaches for interpretation and reporting of immunohistochemistry analysis results in the bone tissue - a review.骨组织免疫组化分析结果的解读与报告的不同方法——综述
Diagn Pathol. 2014 Nov 29;9:221. doi: 10.1186/s13000-014-0221-9.