• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血压正常的透析及肾移植患者的大动脉壁特性

[Large artery wall properties in dialyse and renal transplant patients with normal blood pressure].

作者信息

Posadzy-Małaczyńska Anna, Kosch Marcus, Hausberg Martin, Rahn Karl H, Małaczyński Paweł, Głuszek Jerzy, Tykarski Andrzej

机构信息

Kliniki Nadciśnienia Tetniczego, Chorób Wewnetrznych, Akademii Medycznej w Poznaniu.

出版信息

Wiad Lek. 2004;57(11-12):611-6.

PMID:15865237
Abstract

Structural and mechanical properties of the arterial wall are altered in patients with renal failure. Age and hypertension are known to affect the vessel wall structure. Aging process of arterial wall appears to be accelerated in patients with end-stage renal failure. The mechanisms responsible for reduced arterial compliance and distensibility in dialyse patients and renal transplant recipients without hypertension remain to be evaluated. 20 normotensive dialyse patients (D), 20 normotensive renal transplant recipients (T) and 20 healthy volunteers (N) matched for age, sex and blood pressure as controls were enrolled in to the study. Patients with cardiovascular risk factors and diabetes were excluded. The arterial blood pressure of all patients placed below 140/90 mmHg. The dialyse patients and renal transplant recipients were eligible for the study if the serum creatinine level was below 2 mg/dl. In all subjects, fasting concentrations of serum creatinine, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, hemoglobin and glucose were determined at enrollment to the study. Long-term immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine and prednisolone. Blood pressure was measured using an automatic sphygmomanometer (Criticon Dinamap model 1846 SX). Pulse wave velocity (PWV) was evaluated using non-invasive automatic Complior device. The vessel wall properties of the left common carotid artery were studied using multigate pulsed Doppler's system (Pie Medical Equipment BV Maastricht, The Netherlands). The frequency of transducer used was 7.5 MHz. With this non-invasive method, the end-diastolic diameter (d) and the systolic increase of vessel diameter (distension delta d) were measured using ECG trigger. From these data relative systolic increase of vessel diameter (delta d/d) and arterial wall distensibility coefficient (DC) were calculated. Simultaneously with the ultrasound measurements at the left common carotid artery carotid pulse waveforms are recorded using applanation tonometry (Micro Tip Pulse Transducer, SPT 301 and Transducer Control Unit TCB-500, Millar Instruments, Houston, TX, USA). Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and central pulse pressure (CPP) were significantly higher in (T) than in (D) and (N) group respectively 139 +/- 18 mmHg and 58 +/- 16 mmHg vs 127 +/- 13 mmHg and 49 +/- 11 mmHg and 132 mmHg and 50 +/- 11 mmHg. The end-diastolic diameter (d) did not change significantly between all groups. The systolic increase of vessel diameter (distension delta d) was significantly lower in patients group (D) and (T) respectively 461 +/- 33 microm and 501 +/- 34 microm than in controls. Similar relative systolic increase of vessel diameter (delta d/d) was in these groups significantly lower than in healthy volunteers, respectively (D) 6.26 +/- 0.5%, (T) 6.91 +/- 0.4% vs (N) 9.14 +/- 0.4%. The distensibility coefficient were also significantly lower in (D) and (T) than in (N) groups respectively (D) 18.31 +/- 1.4 10(-3)/kPa and (T) 17.97 +/- 1.4 10(-3)/kPa and (N) 24.3 +/- 0.5 10(-3)/kPa. PWV in both groups of patients was statistically significant higher than in control group correspondingly (D) 11.2 +/- 1.02 m/s and (T) 12.8 +/- 1.12 m/s, (N) 9.5 +/- 0.88 m/s. There was significant correlation between the change of arterial DC, PWV and CPP in (T) group (n = 20; r = -0.42; p < 0.01 and n = 20; r = 0.47; p < 0.05). The arterial wall elastic properties in dialyse and renal recipients patients are decreased. End-stage renal disease accelerates arterial stiffening despite arteriosclerosis and hypertension. Renal transplantation do not reverse lost of elastic properties of arteries in end-stage renal insufficiency.

摘要

肾衰竭患者动脉壁的结构和力学特性会发生改变。已知年龄和高血压会影响血管壁结构。终末期肾衰竭患者的动脉壁老化过程似乎会加速。在无高血压的透析患者和肾移植受者中,导致动脉顺应性和扩张性降低的机制仍有待评估。选取20名血压正常的透析患者(D组)、20名血压正常的肾移植受者(T组)以及20名年龄、性别和血压相匹配的健康志愿者(N组)作为对照纳入研究。排除有心血管危险因素和糖尿病的患者。所有患者的动脉血压均低于140/90 mmHg。若血清肌酐水平低于2 mg/dl,透析患者和肾移植受者符合研究条件。在所有受试者入组研究时,测定其空腹血清肌酐、总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、血红蛋白和血糖浓度。长期免疫抑制方案为环孢素和泼尼松龙。使用自动血压计(Criticon Dinamap型号1846 SX)测量血压。使用无创自动Complior设备评估脉搏波速度(PWV)。使用多门脉冲多普勒系统(荷兰马斯特里赫特的Pie Medical Equipment BV公司生产)研究左颈总动脉的血管壁特性。所用换能器频率为7.5 MHz。通过这种无创方法,使用心电图触发测量舒张末期直径(d)和血管直径的收缩期增加量(扩张量Δd)。根据这些数据计算血管直径的相对收缩期增加量(Δd/d)和动脉壁扩张系数(DC)。在使用超声测量左颈总动脉的同时,使用压平式眼压计(美国得克萨斯州休斯顿的Millar Instruments公司生产的Micro Tip Pulse Transducer、SPT 301和换能器控制单元TCB - 500)记录颈动脉脉搏波形。收缩压(SBP)和中心脉压(CPP)在(T)组显著高于(D)组和(N)组,分别为139±18 mmHg和58±16 mmHg,而(D)组为127±13 mmHg和49±11 mmHg,(N)组为132 mmHg和50±11 mmHg。所有组之间舒张末期直径(d)无显著变化。患者组(D)和(T)的血管直径收缩期增加量(扩张量Δd)分别为461±33微米和501±34微米,显著低于对照组。这些组中血管直径的相对收缩期增加量(Δd/d)也显著低于健康志愿者,(D)组为6.26±0.5%,(T)组为6.91±0.4%,而(N)组为9.14±0.4%。扩张系数在(D)组和(T)组也显著低于(N)组,分别为(D)18.31±1.4×10⁻³/kPa和(T)17.97±1.4×10⁻³/kPa,(N)组为24.3±0.5×10⁻³/kPa。两组患者的PWV在统计学上均显著高于对照组,相应地(D)组为11.2±1.02 m/s,(T)组为12.8±1.12 m/s,(N)组为9.5±0.88 m/s。(T)组(n = 20;r = -0.42;p < 0.01和n = 20;r = 0.47;p < 0.05)中动脉DC、PWV和CPP的变化之间存在显著相关性。透析患者和肾移植受者的动脉壁弹性特性降低。尽管存在动脉硬化和高血压,终末期肾病仍会加速动脉僵硬。肾移植并不能逆转终末期肾功能不全患者动脉弹性特性的丧失。

相似文献

1
[Large artery wall properties in dialyse and renal transplant patients with normal blood pressure].血压正常的透析及肾移植患者的大动脉壁特性
Wiad Lek. 2004;57(11-12):611-6.
2
Arterial distensibility, intima media thickness and pulse wave velocity after renal transplantation and in dialysis normotensive patients.肾移植后及透析正常血压患者的动脉扩张性、内膜中层厚度及脉搏波速度
Int Angiol. 2005 Mar;24(1):89-94.
3
Effect of hyperparathyroidism on arterial distensibility in renal transplant recipients.甲状旁腺功能亢进对肾移植受者动脉扩张性的影响。
Kidney Int. 1998 Jul;54(1):210-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00963.x.
4
Arterial distensibility and pulse wave velocity in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism before and after parathyroidectomy.原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进患者甲状旁腺切除术前及术后的动脉扩张性和脉搏波速度
Clin Nephrol. 2001 Apr;55(4):303-8.
5
A longitudinal study of vessel wall properties in normotensive and hypertensive renal transplant recipients.一项针对血压正常和高血压肾移植受者血管壁特性的纵向研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 1998 Oct;12(10):707-11. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000692.
6
[Vascular stiffness in chronic renal failure patients treated by hemodialysis].[接受血液透析治疗的慢性肾衰竭患者的血管僵硬度]
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2005 Nov;114(5):1072-8.
7
Arterial function after successful renal transplantation.肾移植成功后的动脉功能
Kidney Int. 2004 May;65(5):1882-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00595.x.
8
Factors associated with increased arterial stiffness in renal transplant recipients.与肾移植受者动脉僵硬程度增加相关的因素。
Med Sci Monit. 2010 Jun;16(6):CR301-6.
9
Different effects of hypertension, atherosclerosis and hyperlipidaemia on arterial distensibility.高血压、动脉粥样硬化和高脂血症对动脉扩张性的不同影响。
J Hypertens. 1995 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):1712-7.
10
Arterial stiffness in chronic renal failure and after renal transplantation.慢性肾衰竭及肾移植后的动脉僵硬度
Transplant Proc. 2010 Jul-Aug;42(6):2299-303. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.05.017.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Enalapril, Losartan, or Not Antihypertensive on the Oxidative Status in Renal Transplant Recipients.依那普利、氯沙坦或不降压对肾移植受者氧化状态的影响。
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022 Mar 10;2022:5622626. doi: 10.1155/2022/5622626. eCollection 2022.