Suppr超能文献

采用多种肾动脉结扎方法的破裂强度及潜在的失败机制。

Bursting strength with various methods of renal artery ligation and potential mechanisms of failure.

作者信息

Elliott Sean P, Joel Andrew B, Meng Maxwell V, Stoller Marshall L

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Avenue Suite A-633, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2005 Apr;19(3):307-11. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.307.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Vascular control is crucial during laparoscopic ligation of the renal vessels. Intracorporeal suture ligation has been replaced by easier methods, such as specialized clip appliers and automatic stapling devices; nevertheless, the optimal application and margin of safety of such devices have yet to be determined. We sought to address this question by measuring the bursting strength of arteries ligated with several standard devices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One end of an adult porcine artery (3-7-mm diameter) was occluded with a titanium clip, self-locking polymer clip, or laparoscopic linear cutting stapler. Comparisons were made with one or two clips and with different distal cuff lengths (i.e., flush or 2 mm). The open end was secured to a pulsatile infusion pump. Leak/failure pressures were measured using a digital barometer.

RESULTS

The mean bursting pressures for the clips were above physiologic arterial pressures (1220-1500 mm Hg). However, the vessels closed with the stapler leaked at a lower mean pressure (262 mm Hg). Failure of titanium or self-locking polymer clips was the result of vessel retraction into and behind the clip, while staple- line leakage occurred between individual staples. Bursting pressures with the titanium and self-locking polymer clips was unaffected by the number of clips or length of vascular cuff.

CONCLUSIONS

All tested methods of vascular control performed well at physiologic pressures, suggesting that safety is not increased with traditional maneuvers such as additional clips or longer cuff length.

摘要

背景与目的

在腹腔镜下结扎肾血管过程中,血管控制至关重要。体内缝合结扎已被更简便的方法所取代,如专用夹钳和自动吻合器;然而,此类器械的最佳应用方式及安全 margin 尚未确定。我们试图通过测量使用几种标准器械结扎动脉的破裂强度来解决这个问题。

材料与方法

用钛夹、自锁聚合物夹或腹腔镜线性切割吻合器闭塞成年猪动脉(直径 3 - 7 毫米)的一端。对使用一个或两个夹子以及不同远端袖带长度(即平齐或 2 毫米)的情况进行比较。开放端固定到脉动输液泵上。使用数字气压计测量渗漏/失效压力。

结果

夹子的平均破裂压力高于生理动脉压力(1220 - 1500 毫米汞柱)。然而,用吻合器闭合的血管在较低平均压力(262 毫米汞柱)时发生渗漏。钛夹或自锁聚合物夹的失效是血管回缩到夹子内及夹子后方所致,而钉线渗漏发生在单个钉之间。钛夹和自锁聚合物夹的破裂压力不受夹子数量或血管袖带长度的影响。

结论

所有测试的血管控制方法在生理压力下表现良好,这表明诸如增加夹子数量或延长袖带长度等传统操作并不会提高安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验