Suppr超能文献

不可吸收聚合物结扎与带血管套和不带血管套的标准钛夹的比较。

Comparison of nonabsorbable polymer ligating and standard titanium clips with and without a vascular cuff.

作者信息

Jellison Forrest C, Baldwin D Duane, Berger Kenneth A, Maynes Lincoln J, Desai Premal J

机构信息

Division of Urologic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2005 Sep;19(7):889-93. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.889.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of nonabsorbable polymer ligating (NPL) and titanium clips applied with and without a 1-mm vascular cuff at physiologic and supraphysiologic pressures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An in vitro equine-vessel model was created to test clip occlusion strength. Ten-millimeter NPL and standard Ti clips were applied to veins (10 mm) and arteries (10, 6, and 5 mm) with and without a 1-mm cuff and tested until they held a pressure of 300 mm Hg (veins) or 760 mm Hg (arteries) for 2 minutes or leaked.

RESULTS

The NPL clip was statistically more secure on 10-mm veins with and without a cuff, 10-mm arteries with and without a cuff, and 6-mm arteries with a cuff than was the Ti clip. Leaving a 1-mm cuff resulted in a statistically higher leak point in all vessels tested except the 6-mm arteries secured with the Ti clip.

CONCLUSIONS

The NPL clip was more secure than the Ti clip on larger arteries and veins. A 1-mm vascular cuff enhances the security of both NPL and Ti clips in vessels of all sizes. The NPL clip is secure and reliable in securing both arteries and veins.

摘要

目的

比较不可吸收聚合物结扎术(NPL)与钛夹在生理压力和超生理压力下,使用和不使用1毫米血管袖带时的疗效。

材料与方法

建立体外马血管模型以测试夹子的闭塞强度。将10毫米的NPL和标准钛夹应用于有和没有1毫米袖带的静脉(10毫米)和动脉(10、6和5毫米),并进行测试,直到它们在300毫米汞柱(静脉)或760毫米汞柱(动脉)的压力下保持2分钟或发生渗漏。

结果

在有和没有袖带的10毫米静脉、有和没有袖带的10毫米动脉以及有袖带的6毫米动脉上,NPL夹在统计学上比钛夹更牢固。除了用钛夹固定的6毫米动脉外,在所有测试血管中,保留1毫米袖带在统计学上导致更高的渗漏点。

结论

在较大的动脉和静脉上,NPL夹比钛夹更牢固。1毫米的血管袖带可提高NPL和钛夹在各种尺寸血管中的安全性。NPL夹在固定动脉和静脉方面安全可靠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验