Hayden Jill A, van Tulder Maurits W, Malmivaara Antti V, Koes Bart W
Institute for Work & Health and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ann Intern Med. 2005 May 3;142(9):765-75. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-9-200505030-00013.
Exercise therapy is widely used as an intervention in low back pain.
To evaluate the effectiveness of exercise therapy in adult nonspecific acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain versus no treatment and other conservative treatments.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases to October 2004; citation searches and bibliographic reviews of previous systematic reviews.
Randomized, controlled trials evaluating exercise therapy for adult nonspecific low back pain and measuring pain, function, return to work or absenteeism, and global improvement outcomes.
Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data on study characteristics, quality, and outcomes at short-, intermediate-, and long-term follow-up.
61 randomized, controlled trials (6390 participants) met inclusion criteria: acute (11 trials), subacute (6 trials), and chronic (43 trials) low back pain (1 trial was unclear). Evidence suggests that exercise therapy is effective in chronic back pain relative to comparisons at all follow-up periods. Pooled mean improvement (of 100 points) was 7.3 points (95% CI, 3.7 to 10.9 points) for pain and 2.5 points (CI, 1.0 to 3.9 points) for function at earliest follow-up. In studies investigating patients (people seeking care for back pain), mean improvement was 13.3 points (CI, 5.5 to 21.1 points) for pain and 6.9 points (CI, 2.2 to 11.7 points) for function, compared with studies where some participants had been recruited from a general population (for example, with advertisements). Some evidence suggests effectiveness of a graded-activity exercise program in subacute low back pain in occupational settings, although the evidence for other types of exercise therapy in other populations is inconsistent. In acute low back pain, exercise therapy and other programs were equally effective (pain, 0.03 point [CI, -1.3 to 1.4 points]).
Limitations of the literature, including low-quality studies with heterogeneous outcome measures inconsistent and poor reporting, and possibility of publication bias.
Exercise therapy seems to be slightly effective at decreasing pain and improving function in adults with chronic low back pain, particularly in health care populations. In subacute low back pain populations, some evidence suggests that a graded-activity program improves absenteeism outcomes, although evidence for other types of exercise is unclear. In acute low back pain populations, exercise therapy is as effective as either no treatment or other conservative treatments.
运动疗法被广泛用作腰痛的一种干预措施。
评估运动疗法对成人非特异性急性、亚急性和慢性腰痛的有效性,并与不治疗及其他保守治疗进行比较。
截至2004年10月的MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsychInfo、CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆数据库;对以往系统评价的引文检索和文献综述。
评估运动疗法治疗成人非特异性腰痛并测量疼痛、功能、重返工作岗位或旷工情况以及整体改善结果的随机对照试验。
两名评价员独立选择研究,并提取关于研究特征、质量以及短期、中期和长期随访结果的数据。
61项随机对照试验(6390名参与者)符合纳入标准:急性腰痛(11项试验)、亚急性腰痛(6项试验)和慢性腰痛(43项试验)(1项试验情况不明)。有证据表明,在所有随访期内,与其他治疗相比,运动疗法对慢性腰痛有效。在最早的随访中,疼痛的合并平均改善(满分100分)为7.3分(95%可信区间,3.7至10.9分),功能为2.5分(可信区间,1.0至3.9分)。在针对患者(因腰痛寻求治疗的人)的研究中,疼痛的平均改善为13.3分(可信区间,5.5至21.1分),功能为6.9分(可信区间,2.2至11.7分),而在一些从普通人群中招募参与者(如通过广告)的研究中则有所不同。一些证据表明,分级活动运动方案对职业环境中的亚急性腰痛有效,不过其他人群中其他类型运动疗法的证据并不一致。在急性腰痛中,运动疗法和其他方案同样有效(疼痛,0.03分[可信区间,-1.3至1.4分])。
文献存在局限性,包括研究质量低、结局测量不一致且报告不佳,以及存在发表偏倚的可能性。
运动疗法似乎在减轻慢性腰痛成人的疼痛和改善功能方面略有效果,尤其是在医疗保健人群中。在亚急性腰痛人群中,一些证据表明分级活动方案可改善旷工情况,不过其他类型运动的证据尚不清楚。在急性腰痛人群中,运动疗法与不治疗或其他保守治疗同样有效。