Suppr超能文献

全切除对于后颅窝室管膜瘤来说是足够的治疗方法吗?

Is gross-total resection sufficient treatment for posterior fossa ependymomas?

作者信息

Rogers Leland, Pueschel Jeanette, Spetzler Robert, Shapiro William, Coons Stephen, Thomas Terry, Speiser Burton

机构信息

GammaWest Radiation Therapy, Salt Lake City, Utah 84102, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2005 Apr;102(4):629-36. doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.4.0629.

Abstract

OBJECT

The goals of this study were to analyze outcomes in patients with posterior fossa ependymomas, determine whether gross-total resection (GTR) alone is appropriate treatment, and evaluate the role of radiation therapy.

METHODS

All patients with newly diagnosed intracranial ependymomas treated at Barrow Neurological Institute between 1983 and 2002 were identified. Those with supratentorial primary lesions, subependymomas, or neuraxis dissemination were excluded. Forty-five patients met the criteria for the study. Gross-total resection was accomplished in 32 patients (71%) and subtotal resection (STR) in 13 (29%). Radiation therapy was given to 25 patients: 13 following GTR and 12 after STR. The radiation fields were craniospinal followed by a posterior fossa boost in six patients and posterior fossa or local only in the remaining patients. With a median follow-up period of 66 months, the median duration of local control was 73.5 months with GTR alone, but has not yet been reached for patients with both GTR and radiotherapy (p = 0.020). The median duration of local control following STR and radiotherapy was 79.6 months. The 10-year actuarial local control rate was 100% for patients who underwent GTR and radiotherapy, 50% for those who underwent GTR alone, and 36% for those who underwent both STR and radiotherapy, representing significant differences between the GTR-plus-radiotherapy and GTR-alone cohorts (p = 0.018), and between the GTR-plus-radiotherapy and the STR-plus-radiotherapy group (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in the 10-year actuarial local control rate between the GTR-alone and STR-plus-radiotherapy cohorts (p = 0.370). The 10-year overall survival was numerically superior in patients who underwent both GTR and radiotherapy: 83% compared with 67% in those who underwent GTR alone and 43% in those who underwent both STR and radiotherapy. These differences did not achieve statistical significance. Univariate analyses revealed that radiotherapy, tumor grade, and extent of resection were significant predictors of local control.

CONCLUSIONS

Gross-total resection should be the intent of surgery when it can be accomplished with an acceptable degree of morbidity. Even after GTR has been confirmed with postoperative imaging, however, adjuvant radiotherapy significantly improves local control. The authors currently recommend the use of postoperative radiotherapy, regardless of whether the resection is gross total or subtotal.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是分析后颅窝室管膜瘤患者的治疗结果,确定单纯全切除(GTR)是否为合适的治疗方法,并评估放射治疗的作用。

方法

确定1983年至2002年间在巴罗神经学研究所接受治疗的所有新诊断的颅内室管膜瘤患者。排除幕上原发性病变、室管膜下瘤或神经轴扩散的患者。45例患者符合研究标准。32例患者(71%)实现了全切除,13例患者(29%)实现了次全切除(STR)。25例患者接受了放射治疗:13例在GTR后,12例在STR后。6例患者的放射野为全脑脊髓照射后加后颅窝增强照射,其余患者仅行后颅窝或局部照射。中位随访期为66个月,单纯GTR患者的局部控制中位持续时间为73.5个月,而接受GTR和放射治疗的患者尚未达到该时间(p = 0.020)。STR和放射治疗后的局部控制中位持续时间为79.6个月。接受GTR和放射治疗的患者10年精算局部控制率为100%,单纯接受GTR的患者为50%,接受STR和放射治疗的患者为36%,这表明GTR加放射治疗组与单纯GTR组之间存在显著差异(p = 0.018),GTR加放射治疗组与STR加放射治疗组之间也存在显著差异(p = 0.003)。单纯GTR组和STR加放射治疗组的10年精算局部控制率无显著差异(p = 0.370)。接受GTR和放射治疗的患者10年总生存率在数值上更高:分别为83%、单纯接受GTR的患者为67%、接受STR和放射治疗的患者为43%。这些差异未达到统计学意义。单因素分析显示,放射治疗、肿瘤分级和切除范围是局部控制的显著预测因素。

结论

在能够以可接受的发病率实现全切除时,手术应旨在进行全切除。然而,即使术后影像学证实已实现GTR,辅助放射治疗仍能显著提高局部控制率。作者目前建议无论切除是全切除还是次全切除,均应使用术后放射治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验