• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可容忍的或可接受的:英国与荷兰风险监管之比较

Tolerable or acceptable: a comparison of risk regulation in the United kingdom and in the Netherlands.

作者信息

Ale B J M

机构信息

TUDelft/TBM Safety Science. Delft, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2005 Apr;25(2):231-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00585.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00585.x
PMID:15876200
Abstract

In managing major accident hazards in industry risk, both the United Kingdom and the Netherlands use quantitative risk analysis and quantified risk criteria. These should be understood in the historical, legal, and political context in which they were drawn up. Even when criteria are numerically the same they do not necessarily mean the same thing. The legal and historical context differs widely between the two countries. Nevertheless, it is surprising that the final results in terms of land use and levels of risk are very similar.

摘要

在管理工业风险中的重大事故隐患时,英国和荷兰都采用定量风险分析和量化风险标准。应在制定这些标准的历史、法律和政治背景下来理解它们。即使标准在数值上相同,它们的含义也不一定相同。两国的法律和历史背景差异很大。然而,令人惊讶的是,在土地使用和风险水平方面的最终结果却非常相似。

相似文献

1
Tolerable or acceptable: a comparison of risk regulation in the United kingdom and in the Netherlands.可容忍的或可接受的:英国与荷兰风险监管之比较
Risk Anal. 2005 Apr;25(2):231-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00585.x.
2
Laser safety: practical measures and latest legislative requirements.激光安全:实际措施与最新立法要求
J Perioper Pract. 2011 Sep;21(9):299-303. doi: 10.1177/175045891102100901.
3
Safety on construction sites--employers and designers are now liable.建筑工地安全——雇主和设计师现在负有责任。
Health Estate J. 1994 Apr;48(3):21-2.
4
The use of generic failure frequencies in QRA: the quality and use of failure frequencies and how to bring them up-to-date.在定量风险分析(QRA)中使用通用失效频率:失效频率的质量与使用以及如何使其与时俱进。
J Hazard Mater. 2006 Mar 31;130(3):265-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.013. Epub 2005 Aug 18.
5
Risks of involvement in contractor safety.
Occup Health Saf. 2005 Jan;74(1):38, 40, 42 passim.
6
Health care safety management: a regulatory update for 1997.
Healthc Facil Manag Ser. 1997 Mar:1-27.
7
Historical and political overview.历史与政治概述
Occup Med. 2001 Jan-Mar;16(1):1-10.
8
[Safety and health in work from the perspective of the Prevention of Occupational Hazards Act].[从《预防职业危害法》角度看工作中的安全与健康]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 1996 Jul-Aug;70(4):385-92.
9
Risk-maps informing land-use planning processes A survey on the Netherlands and the United Kingdom recent developments.为土地利用规划过程提供信息的风险地图:关于荷兰和英国近期发展的调查
J Hazard Mater. 2007 Jun 25;145(1-2):241-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.11.032. Epub 2006 Nov 19.
10
Current trends, examples of regulations and practical approaches to occupational health services in the United Kingdom.
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2001;14(1):19-22.