• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

序贯器官衰竭可预测需要重症监护的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的死亡率。

Sequential organ failure predicts mortality of patients with a haematological malignancy needing intensive care.

作者信息

Cornet Alexander D, Issa Aart I, van de Loosdrecht Arjan A, Ossenkoppele Gert J, Strack van Schijndel Rob J M, Groeneveld A B Johan

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Haematol. 2005 Jun;74(6):511-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2005.00418.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0609.2005.00418.x
PMID:15876255
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Poor survival of patients with a haematological malignancy admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) prompts for proper admission triage and prediction of ICU treatment failure and long-term mortality. We therefore tried to find predictors of the latter outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of charts and a prospective follow-up study were done, of haemato-oncological patients, admitted to our ICU in a 7-year period with a follow-up until 2 yr thereafter. Clinical parameters during the first four consecutive days were taken to calculate the simplified acute physiology (SAPS II) and the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores, of proven predictive value in general ICU populations.

RESULTS

From a total of 58 patients (n = 47 with acute myelogenous leukaemia or non-Hodgkin lymphoma), admitted into ICU mostly because of respiratory insufficiency, sepsis, shock or combinations, 36 patients had died during their stay in the ICU. Of ICU survivors (n = 22), 20 patients died during follow-up so that the 1-year survival rate was only 12%. The SAPS II and particularly the SOFA scores were of high predictive value for ICU and long-term mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with life-threatening complications of haematological malignancy admitted to ICU ran a high risk for death in the ICU and on the long-term, and the risk can be well predicted by SOFA. The latter may help us to decide on intensive care in individual cases, in order to avoid potentially futile care for patients with a SOFA score of 15 or higher.

摘要

目的

入住重症监护病房(ICU)的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者生存率较低,这促使我们进行适当的入院分诊,并预测ICU治疗失败和长期死亡率。因此,我们试图找出这些预后的预测因素。

方法

对血液肿瘤患者的病历进行回顾性分析,并进行前瞻性随访研究,这些患者在7年期间入住我们的ICU,并在此后进行了2年的随访。选取连续4天的临床参数来计算简化急性生理学评分(SAPS II)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分,这两个评分在一般ICU患者群体中已被证实具有预测价值。

结果

共有58例患者(n = 47例急性髓系白血病或非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者)入住ICU,主要原因是呼吸功能不全、败血症、休克或多种情况并存,其中36例患者在ICU住院期间死亡。在ICU幸存者(n = 22例)中,20例患者在随访期间死亡,因此1年生存率仅为12%。SAPS II评分,尤其是SOFA评分对ICU死亡率和长期死亡率具有较高的预测价值。

结论

入住ICU的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者出现危及生命的并发症时,在ICU及长期均面临较高的死亡风险,SOFA评分可以很好地预测这种风险。后者可能有助于我们在个别病例中决定是否进行重症监护,以避免对SOFA评分为15分或更高的患者进行可能无效的治疗。

相似文献

1
Sequential organ failure predicts mortality of patients with a haematological malignancy needing intensive care.序贯器官衰竭可预测需要重症监护的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的死亡率。
Eur J Haematol. 2005 Jun;74(6):511-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2005.00418.x.
2
Survival analysis of 314 episodes of sepsis in medical intensive care unit in university hospital: impact of intensive care unit performance and antimicrobial therapy.大学医院医学重症监护病房314例脓毒症发作的生存分析:重症监护病房性能及抗菌治疗的影响
Croat Med J. 2006 Jun;47(3):385-97.
3
Prognosis of patients with acute myeloid leukaemia admitted to intensive care.入住重症监护病房的急性髓系白血病患者的预后
Br J Haematol. 2005 May;129(3):350-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05459.x.
4
Prospective cohort study comparing sequential organ failure assessment and acute physiology, age, chronic health evaluation III scoring systems for hospital mortality prediction in critically ill cirrhotic patients.前瞻性队列研究,比较序贯器官衰竭评估和急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅲ在预测重症肝硬化患者医院死亡率方面的作用。
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Feb;60(2):160-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00634.x.
5
Sequential organ failure assessment score as the determinant of outcome for patients with severe sepsis.序贯器官衰竭评估评分作为严重脓毒症患者预后的决定因素
Croat Med J. 2004 Dec;45(6):715-20.
6
Application of "the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score" in predicting outcome in ICU patients with SIRS.“序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分”在预测重症监护病房(ICU)中全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)患者预后方面的应用。
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2007 Oct-Dec;5(4):475-83.
7
The outcome of acute renal failure in the intensive care unit according to RIFLE: model application, sensitivity, and predictability.根据RIFLE标准评估重症监护病房中急性肾衰竭的预后:模型应用、敏感性及可预测性
Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Dec;46(6):1038-48. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.08.033.
8
Risk factors, sequential organ failure assessment and model for end-stage liver disease scores for predicting short term mortality in cirrhotic patients admitted to intensive care unit.用于预测入住重症监护病房的肝硬化患者短期死亡率的危险因素、序贯器官衰竭评估及终末期肝病模型评分
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Apr 1;23(7):883-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02842.x.
9
The Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) versus the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in outcome prediction.多器官功能障碍评分(MODS)与序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在预后预测中的比较。
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Nov;28(11):1619-24. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1491-3. Epub 2002 Sep 6.
10
Sepsis and organ system failure are major determinants of post-intensive care unit mortality.脓毒症和器官系统功能衰竭是重症监护病房后死亡率的主要决定因素。
J Crit Care. 2008 Dec;23(4):475-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.09.006. Epub 2008 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
[The value of sequential organ failure assessment and its dynamic changes in predicting mortality in hematology intensive care unit].[序贯器官衰竭评估在血液科重症监护病房预测死亡率中的价值及其动态变化]
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2025 Jan 14;46(1):31-38. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20241130-00510.
2
A New Scoring System for Predicting Mortality in Hematological Malignancies with Sepsis: A Derivation and Validation Study.一种用于预测合并脓毒症的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者死亡率的新评分系统:一项推导与验证研究。
Cancer Manag Res. 2023 Sep 29;15:1073-1083. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S428930. eCollection 2023.
3
Outcomes and Risk Factors of Critically Ill Patients with Hematological Malignancy. Prospective Single-Centre Observational Study.
血液恶性肿瘤危重症患者的结局和危险因素。前瞻性单中心观察性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Nov 30;57(12):1317. doi: 10.3390/medicina57121317.
4
Psychological Distress and Its Association With Quality of Life in Organ Transplant Recipients During COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间器官移植受者的心理困扰及其与生活质量的关联
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 24;12:690295. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.690295. eCollection 2021.
5
Predictors of intensive care unit admission in patients with hematologic malignancy.血液恶性肿瘤患者入住重症监护病房的预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 3;10(1):21145. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78114-7.
6
The prognostic factors for patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the intensive care unit.入住重症监护病房的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的预后因素。
Springerplus. 2016 Nov 29;5(1):2038. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3714-z. eCollection 2016.
7
Outcomes and Predictors of Mortality for Patients with Acute Leukemia Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.入住重症监护病房的急性白血病患者的死亡率结局及预测因素
Can Respir J. 2016;2016:3027656. doi: 10.1155/2016/3027656. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
8
Time-Limited Trials of Intensive Care for Critically Ill Patients With Cancer: How Long Is Long Enough?限时重症监护治疗癌症危重症患者的临床试验:多长时间才算足够长?
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jan;2(1):76-83. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3336.
9
One-year survival and resource use after critical illness: impact of organ failure and residual organ dysfunction in a cohort study in Brazil.危重症后的一年生存率及资源利用情况:巴西一项队列研究中器官衰竭和残余器官功能障碍的影响
Crit Care. 2015 Jun 25;19(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0986-6.
10
Improved intensive care unit survival for critically ill allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients following reduced intensity conditioning.强化治疗后,异基因造血干细胞移植受者的重症监护病房存活率得到提高。
Br J Haematol. 2013 May;161(4):578-86. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12294. Epub 2013 Mar 18.