Koner Rajesh, Lin Hsin-Huang, Wei Ho-Hsiang, Mohanta Sasankasekhar
Department of Chemistry, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India.
Inorg Chem. 2005 May 16;44(10):3524-36. doi: 10.1021/ic048196h.
A series of heterodinuclear Cu(II)Ln(III) and Ni(II)Ln(III) complexes, [M(II)L(1)Ln(III)(NO(3))(3)] (M = Cu or Ni; Ln = Ce-Yb), with the hexadentate Schiff base compartmental ligand N,N'-ethylenebis(3-ethoxysalicylaldiimine) (H(2)L(1)) have been synthesized and characterized. The X-ray crystal structure determinations of 13 of these compounds reveal that they are all isostructural. All of these complexes crystallize with the same orthorhombic P2(1)2(1)2(1) space group with closely similar unit cell parameters. Typically, the structure consists of a diphenoxo-bridged 3d-4f dinuclear core, self-assembled to two dimensions due to the intermolecular nitrate...copper(II) or nitrate...nickel(II) semicoordination and weak C-H...O hydrogen bonds. Despite that, the metal centers of the neighboring units are well separated (the ranges of the shortest intermolecular contacts (A) are (M...M) 7.46-7.60, (Ln...Ln) 8.56-8.69, and (M...Ln) 6.12-6.20). Variable-temperature (5-300 K) magnetic susceptibility measurements of all the complexes have been made. The nature of exchange interactions in the Cu(II)Ln(III) systems has been inferred from the Deltachi(M)T versus T plots, where Deltachi(M)T is the difference between the values of chi(M)T for a Cu(II)Ln(III) system and its corresponding Ni(II)Ln(III) analogue. Ferromagnetic interactions seem to be exhibited by the Cu(II)Gd(III), Cu(II)Tb(III), Cu(II)Dy(III), Cu(II)Ho(III), Cu(II)Tm(III), and Cu(II)Yb(III) complexes, while, for the Cu(II)Er(III) complex, no definite conclusion could be reached. On the other hand, among the lower members of the series, the complexes of Ce(III), Nd(III), and Sm(III) exhibit antiferromagnetic interactions, while the Cu(II)Pr(III) and Cu(II)Eu(III) analogues behave as spin-uncorrelated systems. The observations made here vindicate the proposition of Kahn (Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 930). The Deltachi(M)T versus T plots also suggest that, for most of the Cu(II)Ln(III) complexes, the exchange interactions are fairly strong, which probably could be related to the small dihedral angle (ca. 4 degrees) between the CuO(2) and LnO(2) planes.
已合成并表征了一系列异双核Cu(II)Ln(III)和Ni(II)Ln(III)配合物,即[M(II)L(1)Ln(III)(NO(3))(3)](M = Cu或Ni;Ln = Ce - Yb),其配体为六齿席夫碱分隔配体N,N'-亚乙基双(3 - 乙氧基水杨醛二亚胺)(H(2)L(1))。对其中13种化合物进行的X射线晶体结构测定表明它们均为同构结构。所有这些配合物都以相同的正交P2(1)2(1)2(1)空间群结晶,晶胞参数非常相似。通常,该结构由一个双酚氧基桥联的3d - 4f双核核心组成,由于分子间硝酸盐...铜(II)或硝酸盐...镍(II)半配位以及弱C - H...O氢键,自组装成二维结构。尽管如此,相邻单元的金属中心相距较远(最短分子间接触距离(Å)范围为:(M...M) 7.46 - 7.60,(Ln...Ln) 8.56 - 8.69,以及(M...Ln) 6.12 - 6.20)。已对所有配合物进行了变温(5 - 300 K)磁化率测量。从Δχ(M)T对T的图中推断出Cu(II)Ln(III)体系中交换相互作用的性质,其中Δχ(M)T是Cu(II)Ln(III)体系与其相应的Ni(II)Ln(III)类似物的χ(M)T值之差。Cu(II)Gd(III)、Cu(II)Tb(III)、Cu(II)Dy(III)、Cu(II)Ho(III)、Cu(II)Tm(III)和Cu(II)Yb(III)配合物似乎表现出铁磁相互作用,而对于Cu(II)Er(III)配合物,无法得出明确结论。另一方面,在该系列的较低成员中,Ce(III)、Nd(III)和Sm(III)的配合物表现出反铁磁相互作用,而Cu(II)Pr(III)和Cu(II)Eu(III)类似物表现为自旋不相关体系。此处的观察结果证实了卡恩(《无机化学》1997年,第36卷,930页)的观点。Δχ(M)T对T的图还表明,对于大多数Cu(II)Ln(III)配合物,交换相互作用相当强,这可能与CuO(2)和LnO(2)平面之间的小二面角(约4°)有关。