Morris J A, Hanson J E, Steffen B J, Chu A H, Chi-Burris K S, Gotz V P, Gordon R D
ProSanos Corporation, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Clin Transplant. 2005 Jun;19(3):340-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00344.x.
The present study investigated the safety of induction therapy with daclizumab (compared with no induction treatment), in adult renal transplant patients reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database between January 1, 1998 and July 27, 2003. Patients who were discharged from the hospital on mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, or sirolimus were divided into two groups: induction treatment with daclizumab (n = 8203) and no induction treatment (n = 25,368). Patient survival, death due to infection and death due to malignancy were evaluated at 1 and 3 yr post-transplantation. Rejection and graft survival were also examined. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used to evaluate outcomes. No significant differences were found between patients treated with daclizumab compared with patients who received no induction therapy for death due to infection or malignancy at 1 and 3 yr post-transplantation. Patients treated with daclizumab (compared with no induction treatment) had statistically significantly better survival rates at 1 (96.9% vs. 96.2%, p = 0.003) and 3 yr (92.4% vs. 91.4%, p = 0.004) although absolute differences were minimal. This was confirmed in the multivariable Cox regression analysis for patient death at 1 (HR = 0.77, p < 0.001) and 3 yr (HR = 0.83, p = 0.001) post-transplantation. Patients treated with daclizumab compared to no induction had lower rejection rates at 1 (13.1% vs. 17.3%, p < 0.001) and 3 yr post-transplantation (16.7% vs. 21.3%, p < 0.001). Cox regression confirmed a decreased risk for rejection at 1 (HR = 0.74, p < 0.001) and 3 yr (HR = 0.75, p < 0.001). Treatment with daclizumab was associated with reduced risk for graft loss at 1 (HR = 0.82, p < 0.001) and 3 years (HR = 0.86, p < 0.001). In conclusion, daclizumab was associated with a significantly reduced risk for rejection and graft loss compared with no induction treatment, and improved patient survival. In addition, daclizumab was not associated with an increase in risk of death due to infection or malignancy, when compared with no induction therapy. These findings demonstrate the short and long-term safety and efficacy of daclizumab in patients transplanted between January 1998 and July 2003.
本研究调查了1998年1月1日至2003年7月27日期间向移植受者科学注册系统(SRTR)数据库报告的成年肾移植患者中,使用达利珠单抗进行诱导治疗(与不进行诱导治疗相比)的安全性。从医院出院时使用霉酚酸酯、硫唑嘌呤或西罗莫司的患者被分为两组:达利珠单抗诱导治疗组(n = 8203)和不进行诱导治疗组(n = 25,368)。在移植后1年和3年评估患者生存率、感染导致的死亡和恶性肿瘤导致的死亡。还检查了排斥反应和移植物存活率。使用Kaplan-Meier和Cox回归模型评估结果。在移植后1年和3年,接受达利珠单抗治疗的患者与未接受诱导治疗的患者相比,因感染或恶性肿瘤导致的死亡没有显著差异。接受达利珠单抗治疗的患者(与不进行诱导治疗相比)在1年(96.9%对96.2%,p = 0.003)和3年(92.4%对91.4%,p = 0.004)时的生存率在统计学上显著更高,尽管绝对差异很小。这在移植后1年(HR = 0.77,p < 0.001)和3年(HR = 0.83,p = 0.001)患者死亡的多变量Cox回归分析中得到证实。与不进行诱导治疗相比,接受达利珠单抗治疗的患者在移植后1年(13.1%对17.3%,p < 0.001)和3年(16.7%对21.3%,p < 0.001)的排斥率更低。Cox回归证实移植后1年(HR = 0.74,p < 0.001)和3年(HR = 0.75,p < 0.001)排斥风险降低。使用达利珠单抗治疗与移植后1年(HR = 0.82,p < 0.001)和3年(HR = 0.86,p < 0.001)移植物丢失风险降低相关。总之,与不进行诱导治疗相比,达利珠单抗与排斥和移植物丢失风险显著降低相关,并改善了患者生存率。此外,与不进行诱导治疗相比,达利珠单抗与感染或恶性肿瘤导致的死亡风险增加无关。这些发现证明了达利珠单抗在1998年1月至2003年7月期间移植患者中的短期和长期安全性及有效性。