Sandblom Erik, Farrell Anthony P, Altimiras Jordi, Axelsson Michael, Claireaux Guy
Department of Zoology, Göteborg University, Box 463, S-405 30 Göteborg, Sweden.
J Exp Biol. 2005 May;208(Pt 10):1927-35. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01606.
Cardiac preload (central venous pressure, P(CV), mean circulatory filling pressure (MCFP), dorsal aortic blood pressure (P(DA)) and relative cardiac output (Q) were measured in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) at rest and while swimming at 1 and 2 BL s(-1). MCFP, an index of venous capacitance and the upstream venous pressure driving the return of venous blood to the heart, was measured as the plateau in Pcv during ventral aortic occlusion. Compared with resting values, swimming at 1 and 2 BL s(-1) increased Q (by 15+/-1.5 and 38+/-6.5%, respectively), P(CV) (from 0.11+/-0.01 kPa to 0.12+/-0.01 and 0.16+/-0.02 kPa, respectively), MCFP (from 0.27+/-0.02 kPa to 0.31+/-0.02 and 0.40+/-0.04 kPa, respectively) and the calculated pressure gradient for venous return (DeltaP(V), from 0.16+/-0.01 kPa to 0.18+/-0.02 and 0.24+/-0.02 kPa, respectively), but not P(DA). In spite of an increased preload, the increase in Q was exclusively mediated by an increased heart rate (f(H), from 80+/-4 beats min(-1) to 88+/-4 and 103+/-3 beats min(-1), respectively), and stroke volume (Vs) remained unchanged. Prazosin treatment (1 mg kg(-1) Mb) abolished pressure and flow changes during swimming at 1 BL s(-1), but not 2 BL s(-1), indicating that other control systems besides an alpha-adrenoceptor control are involved. This study is the first to address the control of venous capacitance in swimming fish. It questions the generality that increased Q during swimming is regulated primarily through Vs and shows that an increased cardiac filling pressure does not necessarily lead to an increased Vs in fish, but may instead compensate for a reduced cardiac filling time.
在静止状态以及以1体长/秒和2体长/秒的速度游泳时,对海鲈(欧洲鲈)的心脏前负荷(中心静脉压、P(CV)、平均循环充盈压(MCFP)、背主动脉血压(P(DA))和相对心输出量(Q))进行了测量。MCFP是静脉容量的指标以及驱动静脉血回流至心脏的上游静脉压力,在腹主动脉闭塞期间通过Pcv的平台期进行测量。与静息值相比,以1体长/秒和2体长/秒的速度游泳时,Q分别增加了15±1.5%和38±6.5%,P(CV)分别从0.11±0.01千帕增加到0.12±0.01千帕和0.16±0.02千帕,MCFP分别从0.27±0.02千帕增加到0.31±0.02千帕和0.40±0.04千帕,计算得出的静脉回流压力梯度(ΔP(V))分别从0.16±0.01千帕增加到0.18±0.02千帕和0.24±0.02千帕,但P(DA)未改变。尽管前负荷增加,但Q的增加完全是由心率增加介导的(f(H)分别从80±4次/分钟增加到88±4次/分钟和103±3次/分钟),而每搏输出量(Vs)保持不变。哌唑嗪处理(1毫克/千克体重)消除了以1体长/秒速度游泳时的压力和流量变化,但对以2体长/秒速度游泳时的变化没有影响,这表明除了α-肾上腺素能受体控制外,还涉及其他控制系统。本研究首次探讨了游泳鱼类静脉容量的控制。它对游泳时Q增加主要通过Vs调节这一普遍观点提出了质疑,并表明心脏充盈压增加不一定会导致鱼类Vs增加,反而可能补偿心脏充盈时间的减少。