Jung Dae Young, Lee Heasuk, Jung Bo-Young, Ock Jiyeon, Lee Myung-Shik, Lee Won-Ha, Suk Kyoungho
Department of Pharmacology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
J Immunol. 2005 May 15;174(10):6467-76. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.10.6467.
TLRs mediate diverse signaling after recognition of evolutionary conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns such as LPS and lipopeptides. Both TLR2 and TLR4 are known to trigger a protective immune response as well as cellular apoptosis. In this study, we present evidence that TLR4, but not TLR2, mediates an autoregulatory apoptosis of activated microglia. Brain microglia underwent apoptosis upon stimulation with TLR4 ligand (LPS), but not TLR2 ligands (Pam(3)Cys-Ser-Lys(4), peptidoglycan, and lipoteichoic acid). Based on studies using TLR2-deficient or TLR4 mutant mice and TLR dominant-negative mutants, we also demonstrated that TLR4, but not TLR2, is necessary for microglial apoptosis. The critical difference between TLR2 and TLR4 signalings in microglia was IFN regulatory factor-3 (IRF-3) activation, followed by IFN-beta expression: while TLR4 agonist induced the activation of IRF-3/IFN-beta pathway, TLR2 did not. Nevertheless, both TLR2 and TLR4 agonists strongly induced NF-kappaB activation and NO production in microglia. Neutralizing Ab against IFN-beta attenuated TLR4-mediated microglial apoptosis. IFN-beta alone, however, did not induce a significant cell death. Meanwhile, TLR2 activation induced microglial apoptosis with help of IFN-beta, indicating that IFN-beta production following IRF-3 activation determines the apoptogenic action of TLR signaling. TLR4-mediated microglial apoptosis was mediated by MyD88 and Toll/IL-1R domain-containing adaptor-inducing IFN-beta, and was associated with caspase-11 and -3 activation rather than Fas-associated death domain protein/caspase-8 pathway. Taken together, TLR4 appears to signal a microglial apoptosis via autocrine/paracrine IFN-beta production, which may act as an apoptotic sensitizer.
Toll样受体(TLRs)在识别进化上保守的病原体相关分子模式(如脂多糖和脂肽)后介导多种信号传导。已知TLR2和TLR4均可触发保护性免疫反应以及细胞凋亡。在本研究中,我们提供证据表明,介导活化小胶质细胞自调节凋亡的是TLR4而非TLR2。脑小胶质细胞在用TLR4配体(脂多糖)刺激后发生凋亡,但用TLR2配体(Pam(3)Cys-Ser-Lys(4)、肽聚糖和脂磷壁酸)刺激则不会。基于使用TLR2缺陷或TLR4突变小鼠以及TLR显性负性突变体的研究,我们还证明,小胶质细胞凋亡必需的是TLR4而非TLR2。小胶质细胞中TLR2和TLR4信号传导的关键差异在于干扰素调节因子-3(IRF-3)激活,随后是干扰素-β表达:虽然TLR4激动剂诱导IRF-3/干扰素-β途径激活,但TLR2则不然。然而,TLR2和TLR4激动剂均强烈诱导小胶质细胞中核因子κB激活和一氧化氮产生。抗干扰素-β中和抗体减弱了TLR4介导的小胶质细胞凋亡。然而,单独的干扰素-β并未诱导明显的细胞死亡。同时,TLR2激活在干扰素-β的帮助下诱导小胶质细胞凋亡,表明IRF-3激活后产生的干扰素-β决定了TLR信号传导的凋亡作用。TLR4介导的小胶质细胞凋亡由髓样分化因子88(MyD88)和含Toll/白细胞介素-1受体结构域的接头诱导干扰素-β介导,并与半胱天冬酶-11和-3激活相关,而非与Fas相关死亡结构域蛋白/半胱天冬酶-8途径相关。综上所述,TLR4似乎通过自分泌/旁分泌干扰素-β产生发出小胶质细胞凋亡信号,干扰素-β可能作为凋亡敏化剂发挥作用。