Kramer S A, Rathbun S R, Elkins D, Karnes R J, Husmann D A
Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
J Urol. 2005 Jun;173(6):2121-4; discussion 2124. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000157689.98314.69.
We sought to determine whether the alpha-adrenergic antagonist doxazosin could be used as primary therapy in children with voiding dysfunction.
Children were assigned to maintain a voiding diary and then randomly divided into a double-blind placebo controlled protocol (0.5 mg doxazosin or placebo). Duplicate uroflow studies with post-void residual evaluations and assessment of dysfunctional voiding scores were performed on initiation and completion of the study. At the conclusion parents were asked to rank the perceived improvement of the urinary incontinence (ie parental subjective perception of improvement).
No significant differences between doxazosin (18) and placebo (20) treated patients were found in the number of incontinent days per week, severity of incontinent episodes or alterations in uroflow patterns. Although not significant, 2 findings suggested a beneficial effect of doxazosin over placebo. Specifically, doxazosin decreased the number of incontinent episodes weekly from a median of 18 to 4, while the number of incontinent episodes weekly in the placebo group remained essentially unchanged, decreasing from 15 to 14 (p = 0.13). Doxazosin also improved the dysfunctional voiding scores over placebo, for an improvement of -3 vs 0 points. Further substantiating a doxazosin effect over placebo was the subjective perception of the parents that doxazosin significantly improved urinary continence (p <0.02).
Compared to placebo, doxazosin did not demonstrate a significant objective benefit, but produced a significant subjective benefit in the treatment of urinary incontinence secondary to voiding dysfunction.
我们试图确定α-肾上腺素能拮抗剂多沙唑嗪是否可作为排尿功能障碍儿童的主要治疗方法。
让儿童记录排尿日记,然后随机分为双盲安慰剂对照方案组(0.5毫克多沙唑嗪或安慰剂)。在研究开始和结束时进行重复尿流率研究,并评估排尿后残余尿量以及排尿功能障碍评分。研究结束时,要求家长对尿失禁的改善情况进行排名(即家长对改善情况的主观感受)。
在每周尿失禁天数、尿失禁发作严重程度或尿流模式改变方面,多沙唑嗪治疗组(18例)和安慰剂治疗组(20例)之间未发现显著差异。虽然差异不显著,但有两项发现表明多沙唑嗪比安慰剂有有益效果。具体而言,多沙唑嗪使每周尿失禁发作次数从中位数18次降至4次,而安慰剂组每周尿失禁发作次数基本保持不变,从15次降至14次(p = 0.13)。与安慰剂相比,多沙唑嗪还改善了排尿功能障碍评分,改善值为-3分对0分。家长的主观感受进一步证实了多沙唑嗪比安慰剂更有效,即多沙唑嗪显著改善了尿失禁情况(p <0.02)。
与安慰剂相比,多沙唑嗪在治疗排尿功能障碍继发的尿失禁方面未显示出显著的客观益处,但产生了显著的主观益处。