Wester R C, Melendres J, Maibach H I
Department of Dermatology, University of California, School of Medicine, San Francisco 94143-0989.
J Toxicol Environ Health. 1992 May;36(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/15287399209531619.
The objectives of this study were to determine the percutaneous absorption of alachlor relative to formulation dilution with water, and to determine the ability of soap and water, and of water only, to remove alachlor from skin, relative to time. Alachlor is a preemergence herbicide. The in vivo percutaneous absorption of alachlor in rhesus monkeys was 17.3 +/- 3.3, 15.3 +/- 3.9, and 21.4 +/- 14.2% for 24-h skin exposure to Lasso formulation diluted 1:20, 1:40, and 1:80, respectively. In vivo, there was no support for increased alachlor skin absorption with water dilution, as previously reported for in vitro absorption. The average in vivo absorption of 18% applied dose over 24 h (0.75%/h) was similar to the maximum in vitro rate of 0.8%/h using human skin and human plasma as receptor fluid. Dose accountability in vivo was 80.6-95.2%. [14C]Alachlor in Lasso diluted 1:20 with water was placed on rhesus monkeys at concentrations of 23 micrograms/10 microliters/cm2. Skin decontamination at 0 h with soap and water (50% Ivory liquid 1:1 v/v with water) removed 73 +/- 15.8% (n = 4) of the applied dose with the first wash; this increased to a total of 82.3 +/- 14.8% with two additional washes. Decontamination after 1 h removed 87.5 +/- 12.4% with three successive washes. After 3 h decontamination ability decreased, and after 24 h only 51.9 +/- 12.2% could be recovered with three successive washes. Using water only, at 0 h 36.6 +/- 12.3% alachlor was removed with the first wash and the total increased to 56.0 +/- 14.0% with two additional washes. At 24 h the total amount decreased to 28.7 +/- 12.2% for three successive washes. Alachlor as Lasso in field-use rate (11 micrograms/cm2) and undiluted (217 and 300 micrograms/cm2) proportions were left on rhesus monkey skin for 12 h and decontaminated with soap and water (10% Ivory liquid v/v with water). Continual successive washes (6-8 in sequence) recovered 80-90% of the skin-applied alachlor. These results suggest that simple washing with soap and water is appropriate for removing some chemicals from skin. Decontamination with only water was less effective than with soap and water.
本研究的目的是确定甲草胺相对于用水稀释制剂后的经皮吸收情况,并确定肥皂和水以及仅用水相对于时间从皮肤去除甲草胺的能力。甲草胺是一种苗前除草剂。恒河猴体内甲草胺的经皮吸收情况如下:对于24小时皮肤暴露于分别稀释为1:20、1:40和1:80的拉索(Lasso)制剂,其吸收量分别为17.3±3.3%、15.3±3.9%和21.4±14.2%。在体内,没有证据支持用水稀释会增加甲草胺的皮肤吸收,而之前体外吸收的报告显示会增加。24小时内18%的给药剂量的平均体内吸收量(0.75%/小时)与使用人皮肤和人血浆作为受体液时体外最大吸收率0.8%/小时相似。体内剂量回收率为80.6 - 95.2%。用水稀释为1:20的拉索制剂中的[¹⁴C]甲草胺以23微克/10微升/平方厘米的浓度涂于恒河猴身上。在0小时用肥皂和水(50%象牙液与水1:1体积比)进行皮肤去污,第一次清洗去除了73±15.8%(n = 4)的给药剂量;再额外清洗两次后,总量增加到82.3±14.8%。1小时后去污,连续三次清洗去除了87.5±12.4%。3小时后去污能力下降,24小时后,连续三次清洗仅能回收51.9±12.2%。仅用水时,在0小时第一次清洗去除了36.6±12.3%的甲草胺,再额外清洗两次后总量增加到56.0±14.0%。24小时时,连续三次清洗总量降至28.7±12.2%。以田间使用剂量(11微克/平方厘米)和未稀释(217和300微克/平方厘米)比例的拉索制剂形式的甲草胺留在恒河猴皮肤上12小时,然后用肥皂和水(10%象牙液体积比与水)进行去污。连续多次清洗(依次6 - 8次)回收了80 - 90%涂于皮肤上的甲草胺。这些结果表明,用肥皂和水简单清洗适合从皮肤去除某些化学物质。仅用水去污不如用肥皂和水有效。