Suppr超能文献

亚甲基二苯基异氰酸酯(MDI)的体内皮肤去污:与聚丙二醇、聚乙二醇基清洁剂和玉米油相比,肥皂和水无效。

In vivo skin decontamination of methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI): soap and water ineffective compared to polypropylene glycol, polyglycol-based cleanser, and corn oil.

作者信息

Wester R C, Hui X, Landry T, Maibach H I

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0989, USA.

出版信息

Toxicol Sci. 1999 Mar;48(1):1-4. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.toxsci.a034663.

Abstract

In the home and workplace, decontamination of a chemical from skin is traditionally done with a soap-and-water wash, although some workplaces may have emergency showers. It has been assumed that these procedures are effective, yet workplace illness and even death occur from chemical contamination. Water, or soap and water, may not be the most effective means of skin decontamination, particularly for fat-soluble materials. This study was undertaken to help determine whether there are more effective means of removing methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI), a potent contact sensitizer, from the skin. MDI is an industrial chemical for which skin decontamination, using traditional soap and water and nontraditional polypropylene glycol, a polyglycol-based cleanser (PG-C), and corn oil were all tried in vivo on the rhesus monkey, over 8 h. Water, alone and with soap (5% and 50% soap), were partially effective in the first h after exposure, removing 51-69% of the applied dose. However, decontamination fell to 40-52% at 4 h and 29-46% by 8 h. Thus, the majority of MDI was not removed by the traditional soap-and-water wash; skin tape stripping after washing confirmed that MDI was still on the skin. In contrast, polypropylene glycol, PG-C, and corn oil all removed 68-86% of the MDI in the first h, 74-79% at 4 h, and 72-86% at 8 h. Statistically, polypropylene glycol, PG-C, and corn oil were all better (p < 0.05) than soap and water at 4 and 8 h after dose application. These results indicate that a traditional soap-and-water wash and the emergency water shower are relatively ineffective at removing MDI from the skin. More effective decontamination procedures, as shown here, are available. These procedures are consistent with the partial miscibility of MDI in corn oil and polyglycols.

摘要

在家庭和工作场所,传统上使用肥皂和水清洗皮肤来去除化学物质,尽管一些工作场所可能设有应急淋浴设施。人们一直认为这些程序是有效的,但仍有因化学物质污染导致的工作场所疾病甚至死亡事件发生。水,或者肥皂和水,可能不是皮肤去污的最有效手段,特别是对于脂溶性物质。本研究旨在帮助确定是否有更有效的方法从皮肤上去除亚甲基双苯基异氰酸酯(MDI),一种强效接触致敏剂。MDI是一种工业化学品,在恒河猴身上进行了长达8小时的体内试验,分别尝试了使用传统的肥皂和水、非传统的聚丙二醇(一种基于聚二醇的清洁剂,PG-C)以及玉米油对其进行皮肤去污。单独的水以及添加5%和50%肥皂的水,在接触后的第1小时部分有效,去除了51% - 69%的涂抹剂量。然而,4小时时去污率降至40% - 52%,8小时时降至29% - 46%。因此,传统的肥皂和水洗并没有去除大部分的MDI;清洗后用胶带剥离皮肤证实MDI仍在皮肤上。相比之下,聚丙二醇、PG-C和玉米油在第1小时都去除了68% - 86%的MDI,4小时时为74% - 79%,8小时时为72% - 86%。从统计学角度来看,在给药后4小时和8小时,聚丙二醇、PG-C和玉米油都比肥皂和水效果更好(p < 0.05)。这些结果表明,传统的肥皂和水洗以及应急淋浴在从皮肤上去除MDI方面相对无效。如这里所示,有更有效的去污程序。这些程序与MDI在玉米油和聚二醇中的部分互溶性是一致的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验