Graham S J, Scaife J C, Langley R W, Bradshaw C M, Szabadi E, Xi L, Crumley T, Calder N, Gottesdiener K, Wagner J A
Psychopharmacology Section, Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
J Psychopharmacol. 2005 May;19(3):249-58. doi: 10.1177/0269881105051528.
Sudden intense sensory stimuli elicit a cascade of involuntary responses, including a short-latency skeletal muscular response ('eyeblink startle response') and longer-latency autonomic responses. These responses are enhanced when subjects anticipate an aversive event compared to periods when subjects are resting ('fear potentiation'). It has been reported previously that the anxiolytic diazepam can suppress fear-potentiation of the eyeblink startle response in human volunteers. The present experiment aimed to confirm and extend these observations by examining the effect of another benzodiazepine, lorazepam, on the eyeblink and skin conductance components of the acoustic startle, and on fear-potentiation of these responses. Eighteen male volunteers participated in three weekly sessions in which they received oral treatment with placebo, lorazepam (1 mg) and lorazepam (2 mg), according to a balanced three-period, crossover, double-blind design. Two hours after ingestion of the treatments, electromyographic responses of the orbicularis oculi muscle and skin conductance responses were evoked by sound pulses during alternating periods in which the threat of an electric shock (electrodes attached to the subject's wrist) was present (THREAT) and absent (SAFE). The THREAT condition was associated with significant increase in the amplitude of the electromyographic (EMG) and skin conductance responses; there were also increases in baseline skin conductance, the number and amplitude of 'spontaneous' skin conductance fluctuations and self-rated anxiety. Lorazepam attenuated the effect of THREAT on self-rated anxiety and on the amplitude of the EMG response, but had no significant effect on fear-potentiation of the skin conductance responses. These results extend previous findings of the effect of diazepam on the fear-potentiated eyeblink startle response to lorazepam, and suggest that fear-potentiation of the later autonomic component of the startle response may be less sensitive to benzodiazepines than the fear-potentiated eyeblink response and self-rated anxiety.
突然强烈的感觉刺激会引发一系列非自主反应,包括短潜伏期的骨骼肌反应(“眨眼惊吓反应”)和长潜伏期的自主反应。与受试者休息时相比,当受试者预期会发生厌恶事件时,这些反应会增强(“恐惧增强”)。此前有报道称,抗焦虑药物地西泮可抑制人类志愿者眨眼惊吓反应的恐惧增强。本实验旨在通过研究另一种苯二氮䓬类药物劳拉西泮对听觉惊吓的眨眼和皮肤电导成分以及这些反应的恐惧增强作用,来证实并扩展这些观察结果。18名男性志愿者参加了为期三周的实验,根据平衡的三周期、交叉、双盲设计,他们分别接受了安慰剂、劳拉西泮(1毫克)和劳拉西泮(2毫克)的口服治疗。服药两小时后,在交替出现电击威胁(电极连接到受试者手腕)存在(威胁)和不存在(安全)的时间段内,通过声音脉冲诱发眼轮匝肌的肌电图反应和皮肤电导反应。威胁条件与肌电图(EMG)和皮肤电导反应的幅度显著增加有关;基线皮肤电导、“自发”皮肤电导波动的数量和幅度以及自评焦虑也有所增加。劳拉西泮减弱了威胁对自评焦虑和肌电图反应幅度的影响,但对皮肤电导反应的恐惧增强没有显著影响。这些结果扩展了之前关于地西泮对恐惧增强的眨眼惊吓反应作用的研究结果,并表明惊吓反应后期自主成分的恐惧增强可能比恐惧增强的眨眼反应和自评焦虑对地西泮类药物更不敏感。