Department of Medicine, Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Jul;239(7):2233-2244. doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06111-x. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
Benzodiazepines have been extensively investigated in experimental settings especially after single administration, which mostly revealed effects on unpredictable threat (U-threat) rather than predictable threat (P-threat). Given the need for pharmacological alternatives with a preferable side-effect profile and to better represent clinical conditions, research should cover also other anxiolytics and longer application times.
The present study compared the acute and short-term effects of the translocator protein 18 kDa (TSPO) ligand etifoxine and the benzodiazepine alprazolam on P-threat and U-threat while controlling for sedation.
Sixty healthy male volunteers, aged between 18 and 55 years, were randomly assigned to receive a daily dose of either 150 mg etifoxine, 1.5 mg alprazolam, or placebo for 5 days. On days 1 and 5 of intake, they performed a NPU-threat task including neutral (N), predictable (P), and unpredictable (U) conditions, while startle responsivity and self-reports were studied. Sedative effects were assessed using a continuous performance test.
Neither alprazolam nor etifoxine affected startle responsivity to U-threat on any of the testing days. While etifoxine reduced the startle response to P-threat on day 1 of treatment for transformed data, a contrary effect of alprazolam was found for raw values. No effects on self-reports and no evidence of sedation could be observed for either drug.
None of the anxiolytic substances had an impact on startle potentiation to U-threat even after several days of intake. The effects of the anxiolytics on startle responsivity to P-threat as well as implications for future studies are discussed.
苯二氮䓬类药物在实验环境中已被广泛研究,特别是在单次给药后,这主要揭示了它们对不可预测威胁(U-威胁)而非可预测威胁(P-威胁)的影响。鉴于需要具有更理想的副作用特征的药理学替代品,并更好地代表临床情况,研究还应涵盖其他的焦虑症治疗药物和更长的应用时间。
本研究比较了 TSPO 配体依非佐辛和苯二氮䓬类药物阿普唑仑在控制镇静作用的情况下,对 P-威胁和 U-威胁的急性和短期影响。
60 名年龄在 18 至 55 岁之间的健康男性志愿者,随机分为每日接受 150mg 依非佐辛、1.5mg 阿普唑仑或安慰剂治疗 5 天。在摄入的第 1 天和第 5 天,他们进行了 NPU-威胁任务,包括中性(N)、可预测(P)和不可预测(U)条件,同时研究了惊跳反应和自我报告。使用连续性能测试评估镇静作用。
阿普唑仑和依非佐辛均未影响 U-威胁的惊跳反应在任何测试日。依非佐辛在治疗的第 1 天降低了对 P-威胁的惊跳反应,但阿普唑仑对原始数据则产生了相反的效果。两种药物均未对自我报告产生影响,也未观察到镇静作用的证据。
即使在几天的摄入后,两种抗焦虑物质都没有对 U-威胁的惊跳增强产生影响。讨论了抗焦虑药物对 P-威胁的惊跳反应的影响以及对未来研究的启示。