Frass M, Linkesch M, Banyai S, Resch G, Dielacher C, Löbl T, Endler C, Haidvogl M, Muchitsch I, Schuster E
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Homeopathy, Graz, Austria.
Homeopathy. 2005 Apr;94(2):75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2005.01.002.
Mortality in patients with severe sepsis remains high despite the development of several therapeutic strategies. The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to evaluate whether homeopathy is able to influence long-term outcome in critically ill patients suffering from severe sepsis.
Seventy patients with severe sepsis received homeopathic treatment (n = 35) or placebo (n = 35). Five globules in a potency of 200c were given at 12h interval during the stay at the intensive care unit. Survival after a 30 and 180 days was recorded.
Three patients (2 homeopathy, 1 placebo) were excluded from the analyses because of incomplete data. All these patients survived. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, BMI, prior conditions, APACHE II score, signs of sepsis, number of organ failures, need for mechanical ventilation, need for vasopressors or veno-venous hemofiltration, and laboratory parameters were not significantly different between groups. On day 30, there was non-statistically significantly trend of survival in favour of homeopathy (verum 81.8%, placebo 67.7%, P= 0.19). On day 180, survival was statistically significantly higher with verum homeopathy (75.8% vs 50.0%, P = 0.043). No adverse effects were observed.
Our data suggest that homeopathic treatment may be a useful additional therapeutic measure with a long-term benefit for severely septic patients admitted to the intensive care unit. A constraint to wider application of this method is the limited number of trained homeopaths.
尽管已开发出多种治疗策略,但严重脓毒症患者的死亡率仍然很高。这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的目的是评估顺势疗法是否能够影响患有严重脓毒症的危重症患者的长期预后。
70例严重脓毒症患者接受顺势疗法治疗(n = 35)或安慰剂治疗(n = 35)。在重症监护病房住院期间,每隔12小时给予5粒药力为200c的药丸。记录30天和180天后的生存率。
3例患者(2例接受顺势疗法,1例接受安慰剂)因数据不完整被排除在分析之外。所有这些患者均存活。两组之间的基线特征,包括年龄、性别、体重指数、既往病情、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II评分、脓毒症体征、器官衰竭数量、机械通气需求、血管升压药或静脉-静脉血液滤过需求以及实验室参数,均无显著差异。在第30天,顺势疗法组的生存趋势无统计学显著差异(顺势疗法组为81.8%,安慰剂组为67.7%,P = 0.19)。在第180天,顺势疗法组的生存率在统计学上显著更高(75.8%对50.0%,P = 0.043)。未观察到不良反应。
我们的数据表明,顺势疗法治疗可能是一种有用的额外治疗措施,对入住重症监护病房的严重脓毒症患者具有长期益处。该方法更广泛应用的一个限制是经过培训的顺势疗法医生数量有限。