Hodder Rick, Pavia Demetri, Dewberry Helen, Alexander Karen, Iacono Philippe, Ponitz Hans, Beck Ekkehard
Department of Critical Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Respir Med. 2005 Sep;99(9):1087-95. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.03.037.
Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) is a new-generation inhaler that offers improved lung deposition compared with chlorofluorocarbon metered dose inhalers (CFC-MDIs). Bronchodilators administered via Respimat SMI are preserved and stabilised with low concentrations of benzalkonium chloride and ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid, both of which have been reported to cause dose-related paradoxical bronchoconstriction. The aim of this analysis was to compare the incidence of paradoxical bronchoconstriction after chronic use of bronchodilators via Respimat SMI and CFC-MDI. Data from three clinical trials, in which patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) received ipratropium bromide alone or in combination with fenoterol hydrobromide, or placebo via Respimat SMI or CFC-MDI for 12 weeks, were included in the analysis. In order to evaluate the risk of paradoxical bronchoconstriction, we identified four respiratory events that might have occurred within 30 min of inhalation on four test days; these were: 'bronchospasm', 'other respiratory adverse events', 'rescue medication use' and 'asymptomatic drop in FEV(1) 15% from baseline'. In total, 631 asthma and 1538 COPD patients participated in the three studies. No occurrences of bronchospasm were reported with Respimat SMI on any test day. Overall, the incidence of respiratory events possibly indicative of paradoxical bronchoconstriction was low and similar for both devices. There was no increase in the incidence of events during 12 weeks' treatment. Delivery of bronchodilators by Respimat SMI is safe with regard to paradoxical bronchoconstriction during chronic use in patients with asthma or COPD.
Respimat软雾吸入器(SMI)是新一代吸入器,与氯氟烃定量吸入器(CFC-MDI)相比,其肺部沉积效果更佳。通过Respimat SMI给药的支气管扩张剂用低浓度的苯扎氯铵和乙二胺四乙酸进行保存和稳定,据报道这两种物质都会引起剂量相关的矛盾性支气管收缩。本分析的目的是比较通过Respimat SMI和CFC-MDI长期使用支气管扩张剂后矛盾性支气管收缩的发生率。分析纳入了三项临床试验的数据,在这些试验中,哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者通过Respimat SMI或CFC-MDI单独接受异丙托溴铵或与氢溴酸非诺特罗联合使用,或接受安慰剂治疗12周。为了评估矛盾性支气管收缩的风险,我们确定了在四个测试日吸入后30分钟内可能发生的四种呼吸事件;这些事件为:“支气管痉挛”、“其他呼吸不良事件”、“急救药物使用”和“第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)较基线下降15%且无症状”。总共有631名哮喘患者和1538名COPD患者参与了这三项研究。在任何测试日,使用Respimat SMI均未报告发生支气管痉挛。总体而言,可能提示矛盾性支气管收缩的呼吸事件发生率较低,且两种装置相似。在12周的治疗期间,事件发生率没有增加。对于哮喘或COPD患者长期使用而言,Respimat SMI递送支气管扩张剂在矛盾性支气管收缩方面是安全的。