Suppr超能文献

食管动力障碍谱:对诊断和治疗的意义。

Spectrum of esophageal motility disorders: implications for diagnosis and treatment.

作者信息

Patti Marco G, Gorodner Maria V, Galvani Carlos, Tedesco Pietro, Fisichella Piero M, Ostroff James W, Bagatelos Karen C, Way Lawrence W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0788, USA.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 2005 May;140(5):442-8; discussion 448-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.5.442.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The named primary esophageal motility disorders (PEMDs) are achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm (DES), nutcracker esophagus (NE), and hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (HTN-LES). Although the diagnosis and treatment of achalasia are well defined, such is not the case with the other disorders.

HYPOTHESIS

(1) Symptoms do not reliably distinguish PEMDs from gastroesophageal reflux disease; (2) esophageal function tests are essential to this distinction and to identifying the type of PEMD; (3) minimally invasive surgery is effective for each condition; and (4) the laparoscopic approach is better than the thoracoscopic approach.

DESIGN

University hospital tertiary care center.

SETTING

Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A diagnosis of PEMD was established in 397 patients by esophagogram, endoscopy, manometry, and pH monitoring. There were 305 patients (77%) with achalasia, 49 patients (12%) with DES, 41 patients (10%) with NE, and 2 patients (1%) with HTN-LES. Two hundred eight patients (52%) underwent a myotomy by either a thoracoscopic or a laparoscopic approach.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients (25%) had a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease at the time of referral and had been treated with acid-suppressing medications. In achalasia and DES, a thoracoscopic or laparoscopic myotomy relieved dysphagia and chest pain in more than 80% of the patients. In contrast, in NE the results were less predictable, and the operation most often failed to relieve symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that (1) symptoms were unreliable in distinguishing gastroesophageal reflux disease from PEMDs; (2) esophageal function tests were essential to diagnose PEMD and to define its type; (3) the laparoscopic approach was better than the thoracoscopic approach; (4) a laparoscopic Heller myotomy is the treatment of choice for achalasia, DES, and HTN-LES; and (5) a predictably good treatment for NE is still elusive, and the results of surgery were disappointing.

摘要

背景

命名的原发性食管动力障碍(PEMD)包括贲门失弛缓症、弥漫性食管痉挛(DES)、胡桃夹食管(NE)和高压性下食管括约肌(HTN-LES)。虽然贲门失弛缓症的诊断和治疗已明确,但其他疾病并非如此。

假设

(1)症状不能可靠地区分PEMD与胃食管反流病;(2)食管功能测试对于这种区分以及确定PEMD的类型至关重要;(3)微创手术对每种情况均有效;(4)腹腔镜手术方法优于胸腔镜手术方法。

设计

大学医院三级医疗中心。

设置

对前瞻性收集的数据库进行回顾性分析。

患者和方法

通过食管造影、内镜检查、测压和pH监测,397例患者确诊为PEMD。其中305例(77%)为贲门失弛缓症,49例(12%)为DES,41例(10%)为NE,2例(1%)为HTN-LES。208例(52%)患者通过胸腔镜或腹腔镜手术进行了肌切开术。

结果

99例(25%)患者在转诊时被诊断为胃食管反流病,并接受了抑酸药物治疗。在贲门失弛缓症和DES患者中,胸腔镜或腹腔镜肌切开术使80%以上的患者吞咽困难和胸痛症状得到缓解。相比之下,在NE患者中,结果较难预测,手术大多未能缓解症状。

结论

这些结果表明:(1)症状在区分胃食管反流病和PEMD方面不可靠;(2)食管功能测试对于诊断PEMD及其类型至关重要;(3)腹腔镜手术方法优于胸腔镜手术方法;(4)腹腔镜Heller肌切开术是贲门失弛缓症、DES和HTN-LES的首选治疗方法;(5)对NE的可预测的良好治疗方法仍然难以捉摸,手术结果令人失望。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验