Frantzides Constantine T, Carlson Mark A, Madan Atul K, Stewart Edward T, Smith Claire
Department of Surgery, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Sep;197(3):358-63; discussion 363-4. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00591-X.
BACKGROUND: Preoperative esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring commonly are used in preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing fundoplication. Here we review our experience with the selective preoperative workup of patients undergoing fundoplication to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease. STUDY DESIGN: A series of 628 consecutive antireflux procedures was reviewed. History and physical examination, upper endoscopy, and upper gastrointestinal videofluoroscopy were obtained preoperatively on all patients; the first 30 patients also underwent esophageal manometry and pH monitoring (routine evaluation group). Thereafter, pH monitoring only was performed for atypical reflux symptoms, and manometry only was performed for a history of dysphagia, odynophagia, or for abnormal motility on videofluoroscopy (selective evaluation group). All patients underwent a laparoscopic floppy Nissen fundoplication, and then endoscopy and fluoroscopy at 3 months and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Eighty-five of the patients in the selective evaluation group (14%) required manometry, and 88 (15%) underwent pH monitoring. Eighteen of the 115 patients who underwent manometry (16%) had evidence of dysmotility. None of these 18 patients had increased dysphagia postoperatively; 8 of 18 reported improvement with swallowing. Five patients in the selective group (0.8%) had persistent postoperative dysphagia caused by technical error (four patients) or with no identifiable cause (one patient). The estimated charge or collection reduction with use of the selective evaluation was 1,253,100 US dollars or 395,000 US dollars, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Selective use of manometry and pH monitoring was cost effective and safe in this series. Although esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring might be necessary with abnormal findings on videofluoroscopy or atypical symptoms, in our experience, their routine use is not essential in preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease.
背景:术前食管测压和24小时pH监测常用于胃底折叠术患者的术前评估。在此,我们回顾了我们对因胃食管反流病接受胃底折叠术患者进行选择性术前检查的经验。 研究设计:回顾了连续628例抗反流手术。所有患者术前均进行了病史和体格检查、上消化道内镜检查及上消化道视频透视检查;前30例患者还接受了食管测压和pH监测(常规评估组)。此后,仅针对非典型反流症状进行pH监测,仅针对吞咽困难、吞咽痛病史或视频透视检查显示的异常动力进行测压(选择性评估组)。所有患者均接受了腹腔镜松弛Nissen胃底折叠术,然后在术后3个月和12个月进行内镜检查和透视检查。 结果:选择性评估组中有85例患者(14%)需要进行测压,88例患者(15%)接受了pH监测。接受测压的115例患者中有18例(16%)有动力障碍的证据。这18例患者术后均无吞咽困难加重的情况;18例中有8例报告吞咽功能改善。选择性评估组中有5例患者(0.8%)术后持续存在吞咽困难,原因分别为技术失误(4例)或原因不明(1例)。采用选择性评估估计可分别减少费用1253100美元或收取费用395000美元。 结论:在本系列研究中,选择性使用测压和pH监测具有成本效益且安全。虽然在视频透视检查有异常发现或有非典型症状时可能需要进行食管测压和24小时pH监测,但根据我们的经验,在胃食管反流病患者胃底折叠术的术前评估中,常规使用它们并非必要。
Int J Surg Investig. 1999
Am J Gastroenterol. 1995-1
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011-5-19
Surg Endosc. 2010-11
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009-4