Suppr超能文献

胶质瘤细胞系与多形性胶质母细胞瘤之间的蛋白质及蛋白质模式差异。

Proteins and protein pattern differences between glioma cell lines and glioblastoma multiforme.

作者信息

Vogel Timothy W, Zhuang Zhengping, Li Jie, Okamoto Hiroaki, Furuta Makoto, Lee Youn-Soo, Zeng Weifen, Oldfield Edward H, Vortmeyer Alexander O, Weil Robert J

机构信息

Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2005 May 15;11(10):3624-32. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2115.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Research into the pathogenesis, molecular signaling, and treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has traditionally been conducted using cell lines derived from malignant gliomas. We compared protein expression patterns between solid primary GBMs and GBM cell lines to identify proteins whose expression may be altered in cell culture.

METHODS

We cultured cell lines U87, U118, U251, and A172 and used tissue-selective microdissection of eight primary GBMs to obtain pure populations of tumor cells, which we studied using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DGE) and examined using differential expression software. Select protein targets expressed differentially between GBM tumors and GBM cell lines were sequenced using tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Analysis of the primary GBM tumor samples (n = 8) and the GBM cell lines revealed reproducibly similar proteomic patterns for each group, which distinguished tumors from the cell lines. Gels contained up to 500 proteins that were consistently identified in the pH 4 to 7 range. Comparison of proteins identified in the GBM tumors and in the cell lines showed approximately 160 proteins that were gained and 60 proteins that were lost on culture. Using normalized intensity patterns from the 2DGE images, ANOVA tests were done and statistically significant spots were identified. Seven proteins found in the cell lines were significantly increased when compared with the GBM tumors (P < 0.05), whereas 10 proteins were significantly decreased from cell lines compared with the GBM tumors. Proteins identified included transcription factors, tumor suppressor genes, cytoskeletal proteins, and cellular metabolic proteins.

CONCLUSION

Global protein and proteomic differences were identified between primary GBM tumor samples and GBM cell lines. The proteins identified by 2DGE analysis elucidate some of the selection pressures of in vitro culture, help accentuate the advantages and limitations of cell culture, and may aid comprehension of gliomagenesis and enhance development of new therapeutics.

摘要

引言

多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的发病机制、分子信号传导及治疗研究传统上是使用源自恶性胶质瘤的细胞系来进行的。我们比较了原发性实体GBM与GBM细胞系之间的蛋白质表达模式,以鉴定那些在细胞培养中表达可能发生改变的蛋白质。

方法

我们培养了U87、U118、U251和A172细胞系,并对8例原发性GBM进行组织选择性显微切割以获得肿瘤细胞的纯群体,我们使用二维凝胶电泳(2DGE)对其进行研究,并使用差异表达软件进行分析。对在GBM肿瘤和GBM细胞系之间差异表达的选定蛋白质靶点进行串联质谱测序。

结果

对原发性GBM肿瘤样本(n = 8)和GBM细胞系的分析显示,每组的蛋白质组模式具有可重复性的相似性,这将肿瘤与细胞系区分开来。凝胶中含有多达500种在pH 4至7范围内可被一致鉴定的蛋白质。对GBM肿瘤和细胞系中鉴定出的蛋白质进行比较,结果显示在培养过程中约有160种蛋白质增加,60种蛋白质减少。使用来自2DGE图像的标准化强度模式进行方差分析测试,并鉴定出具有统计学意义的斑点。与GBM肿瘤相比,在细胞系中发现的7种蛋白质显著增加(P < 0.05),而与GBM肿瘤相比,细胞系中有10种蛋白质显著减少。鉴定出的蛋白质包括转录因子、肿瘤抑制基因、细胞骨架蛋白和细胞代谢蛋白。

结论

在原发性GBM肿瘤样本和GBM细胞系之间鉴定出了整体蛋白质和蛋白质组差异。通过2DGE分析鉴定出的蛋白质阐明了体外培养的一些选择压力,有助于突出细胞培养的优点和局限性,并可能有助于理解胶质瘤的发生机制和促进新疗法的开发。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验