Schuntermann Michael F
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Federation of German Pension Insurance Institutes, Odenwaldstrasse 6, D-12161 Berlin, Germany.
Int J Rehabil Res. 2005 Jun;28(2):93-102. doi: 10.1097/00004356-200506000-00001.
The bio-psycho-social model of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) has already found wide acceptance in Germany. In particular, the introduction of contextual factors (environmental factors and personal factors) is welcomed. Several rehabilitation facilities have used the model and the chapters of the revision version (Beta-2) as guidelines for documenting their interviews with rehabilitation patients. Their experiences are encouraging. However, it has already been recognized that coding with the ICF will be difficult and time consuming. Thus, the practicability of the ICF should be improved. Training in the use of the ICF is absolutely essential. It is welcomed that the ICF provides a common vocabulary for both people with disability and for professionals in the fields of rehabilitation and disability. This is particularly important in Germany because we have a rather complicated social system. In contrast to the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH), the ICF, in general, contains neutral terms only. Many of our physicians in rehabilitation complain about that. Obviously they also need to be able to express the signs and symptoms of restrictions of functioning in negative terms and in this respect they feel that the ICIDH was more helpful. While both the concept of activities and the concept of participation are clearly understood from the point of view of content some of us have severe problems with the operationalization of both concepts via qualifiers. From a theoretical perspective we regret that the concept of activity is not theory driven and that the concept of participation is not operationalized independently from the concept of activity. A proposal for solving these problems is given. In Germany, the ICIDH, or the ICF latterly, has been taken into account in the following areas. The new German Social Code Number IX (SGB IX) from 2001, Rehabilitation and participation of people with disabilities, is based on the ICF. All guidelines and general recommendations within the context of rehabilitation have been adjusted to the ICF. The ICF plays an important role in the training for the medical field of physical medicine and rehabilitation and is also included in the training curricula of the medical specializations of social medicine and rehabilitation. The German research programme "Rehabilitation sciences" includes some projects dealing with the ICF. The model of consequences of diseases (ICIDH) has been part of the rehabilitation quality insurance programme of the German Pension Insurance since 1994. Since 1 April 2004, the institutes of the German Health Insurance have applied the ICF to their rehabilitation application form.
《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)的生物 - 心理 - 社会模型在德国已获得广泛认可。特别是情境因素(环境因素和个人因素)的引入受到欢迎。几家康复机构已将该模型及修订版(Beta - 2)的章节用作记录其与康复患者访谈的指南。他们的经验令人鼓舞。然而,人们已经认识到使用ICF进行编码将既困难又耗时。因此,应提高ICF的实用性。ICF使用方面的培训绝对至关重要。ICF为残疾人和康复及残疾领域的专业人员提供了一个通用词汇,这一点受到欢迎。在德国这尤为重要,因为我们有一个相当复杂的社会体系。与《国际损伤、残疾和残障分类》(ICIDH)不同,ICF总体上仅包含中性术语。我们许多从事康复工作的医生对此抱怨不已。显然,他们也需要能够用负面术语表达功能受限的体征和症状,在这方面他们觉得ICIDH更有帮助。虽然从内容角度来看,活动概念和参与概念都很清晰,但我们有些人在通过限定词对这两个概念进行操作化方面存在严重问题。从理论角度看,我们感到遗憾的是活动概念并非由理论驱动,且参与概念并非独立于活动概念进行操作化。文中给出了解决这些问题的建议。在德国,ICIDH或后来的ICF在以下领域得到了考虑。2001年起实施的新的德国社会法典第九编(SGB IX)《残疾人的康复与参与》是以ICF为基础的。康复领域内的所有指南和一般性建议都已根据ICF进行了调整。ICF在物理医学与康复医学领域的培训中发挥着重要作用,并且也被纳入社会医学与康复医学专业的培训课程中。德国的研究项目“康复科学”包括一些涉及ICF的项目。疾病后果模型(ICIDH)自1994年起一直是德国养老保险康复质量保险计划的一部分。自2004年4月1日起,德国健康保险机构已将ICF应用于其康复申请表。