• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康和角色功能:在项目库开发中使用焦点小组。

Health and role functioning: the use of focus groups in the development of an item bank.

机构信息

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2010 Feb;19(1):111-23. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9570-3. Epub 2010 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-009-9570-3
PMID:20047086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3901519/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Role functioning is an important part of health-related quality of life. However, assessment of role functioning is complicated by the wide definition of roles and by fluctuations in role participation across the life-span. The aim of this study is to explore variations in role functioning across the lifespan using qualitative approaches, to inform the development of a role functioning item bank and to pilot test sample items from the bank.

METHODS

Eight focus groups were conducted with a convenience sample of 38 English-speaking adults recruited in Rhode Island. Participants were stratified by gender and four age groups. Focus groups were taped, transcribed, and analyzed for thematic content.

RESULTS

Participants of all ages identified family roles as the most important. There was age variation in the importance of social life roles, with younger and older adults rating them as more important. Occupational roles were identified as important by younger and middle-aged participants. The potential of health problems to affect role participation was recognized. Participants found the sample items easy to understand, response options identical in meaning and preferred five response choices.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants identified key aspects of role functioning and provided insights on their perception of the impact of health on their role participation. These results will inform item bank generation.

摘要

背景

角色功能是健康相关生活质量的一个重要组成部分。然而,由于角色的广泛定义以及角色参与度在整个生命周期中的波动,角色功能的评估变得复杂。本研究的目的是使用定性方法探索整个生命周期中角色功能的变化,为角色功能项目库的开发提供信息,并对来自该库的样本项目进行试点测试。

方法

在罗德岛州,对 38 名英语为母语的成年人进行了 8 次便利样本的焦点小组。参与者按性别和四个年龄组分层。对焦点小组进行录音、转录,并进行主题内容分析。

结果

所有年龄段的参与者都将家庭角色视为最重要的角色。社会生活角色的重要性存在年龄差异,年轻和年长的成年人认为这些角色更重要。职业角色被年轻和中年参与者视为重要的角色。参与者认识到健康问题可能会影响角色参与。他们发现这些样本项目易于理解,选项的含义相同,并更喜欢五种回答选择。

结论

参与者确定了角色功能的关键方面,并就健康对其角色参与的影响提出了看法。这些结果将为项目库的生成提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb38/3901519/8209658e9682/nihms172386f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb38/3901519/748a289b2cec/nihms172386f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb38/3901519/8209658e9682/nihms172386f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb38/3901519/748a289b2cec/nihms172386f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb38/3901519/8209658e9682/nihms172386f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Health and role functioning: the use of focus groups in the development of an item bank.健康和角色功能:在项目库开发中使用焦点小组。
Qual Life Res. 2010 Feb;19(1):111-23. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9570-3. Epub 2010 Jan 3.
2
Development and calibration of a novel social relationship item bank to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in Singapore.开发和校准新型社会关系项目库,以衡量新加坡的健康相关生活质量 (HRQoL)。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 May 8;17(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1150-9.
3
Development of an item bank and computer adaptive test for role functioning.角色功能量表条目库和计算机自适应测验的编制。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Nov;21(9):1625-37. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0076-4. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
4
Development and validation of MyCommunication-Adults, a self-report communicative participation measure.发展和验证 MyCommunication-Adults,一种自我报告的交流参与度测量工具。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Nov-Dec;59(6):2766-2785. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13115. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
5
Development and calibration of a novel positive mindset item bank to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in Singapore.开发和校准一种新的积极心态项目库,以衡量新加坡与健康相关的生活质量 (HRQoL)。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0220293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220293. eCollection 2019.
6
An Item Bank to Measure Systems, Services, and Policies: Environmental Factors Affecting People With Disabilities.一个用于衡量系统、服务和政策的题库:影响残疾人的环境因素。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Dec;97(12):2102-2112. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
7
Identification of aspects of functioning, disability and health relevant to patients experiencing vertigo: a qualitative study using the international classification of functioning, disability and health.识别与眩晕患者相关的功能、残疾和健康方面:使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类的定性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Jun 27;10:75. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-75.
8
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
9
Assessment of health-related family role functioning in systemic lupus erythematosus: preliminary validation of a new measure.评估系统性红斑狼疮患者的健康相关家庭角色功能:新测量方法的初步验证。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Sep;64(9):1341-8. doi: 10.1002/acr.21676.
10
Content comparison of the EORTC CAT Core, SF-36, FACT-G, and PROMIS role and social functioning measures based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的 EORTC CAT 核心量表、SF-36 量表、FACT-G 量表和 PROMIS 角色与社会功能测量量表的内容比较。
Psychooncology. 2023 Sep;32(9):1372-1384. doi: 10.1002/pon.6188. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Trajectory of quality of life among patients with cancer at the end of life: a longitudinal survey study.临终癌症患者的生活质量轨迹:一项纵向调查研究。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Feb 18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03923-0.
2
Hypnosis on patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: A feasibility study.催眠对接受辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者的影响:一项可行性研究。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023 Jan;6(1):e1732. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1732. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
3
Health-Related Quality of Life, Functioning, and Physical Symptoms of Adult Omani Colorectal Cancer Survivors.阿曼成年结直肠癌幸存者的健康相关生活质量、功能和身体症状。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Sep 1;23(9):3019-3027. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.9.3019.
4
Effects of an immersive psychosocial training program on depression and well-being: A randomized clinical trial.沉浸式心理社会培训方案对抑郁和幸福感的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Jun;150:292-299. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.02.034. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
5
Traumatic brain injury in precariously housed persons: Incidence and risks.居住条件不稳定人群中的创伤性脑损伤:发病率及风险
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Feb 1;44:101277. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101277. eCollection 2022 Feb.
6
Patient-Reported Outcomes of Regular Aerobic Exercise in Gastric Cancer.胃癌患者定期有氧运动的患者报告结局
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 25;13(9):2080. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092080.
7
New English and Spanish social health measures will facilitate evaluating health determinants.新的英语和西班牙语社会健康指标将有助于评估健康决定因素。
Health Psychol. 2014 May;33(5):490-9. doi: 10.1037/hea0000055. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
8
Participation and social functioning in patients with fibromyalgia: development and testing of a new questionnaire.纤维肌痛症患者的参与和社会功能:新问卷的制定和测试。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Aug 5;11:135. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-135.
9
Development and psychometric testing of the Hemophilia Well-being Index.血友病生活质量指数的制定与心理计量学测试。
Int J Behav Med. 2013 Dec;20(4):609-17. doi: 10.1007/s12529-012-9261-2.
10
Evaluation of a role functioning computer adaptive test (RF-CAT).角色功能计算机自适应测试(RF-CAT)评估。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Jun;22(5):1085-92. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0215-6. Epub 2012 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Qualitative Research to Inform the Development of a Comprehensive Outcomes Assessment for Asthma.运用定性研究为哮喘综合结局评估的发展提供信息。
Patient. 2009 Dec 1;2(1):269-282. doi: 10.2165/11313840-000000000-00000.
2
Content validity in the PROMIS social-health domain: a qualitative analysis of focus-group data.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)社会健康领域的内容效度:焦点小组数据的定性分析
Qual Life Res. 2008 Jun;17(5):737-49. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9352-3. Epub 2008 May 14.
3
Measuring physical functioning in children with spinal impairments with computerized adaptive testing.使用计算机自适应测试评估脊柱损伤儿童的身体功能。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2008 Apr-May;28(3):330-5. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318168c792.
4
Enhancing the conceptual clarity of the activity and participation components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health.提高《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》中活动与参与部分的概念清晰度。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jun;66(11):2335-45. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.026. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
5
Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes.住院康复出院后随访的计算机自适应测试:II. 参与结果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Feb;89(2):275-83. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.150.
6
Evaluation of item candidates: the PROMIS qualitative item review.条目候选的评估:患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)定性条目审查
Med Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S12-21. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000254567.79743.e2.
7
A review of methods to measure health-related productivity loss.测量与健康相关的生产力损失的方法综述。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Apr;13(4):211-7.
8
Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance.行业指南:患者报告的结局指标:用于医疗产品开发以支持标签声明:指南草案
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Oct 11;4:79. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-79.
9
Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for post-acute care (PM-PAC).急性后期护理参与度测量工具(PM-PAC)的开发与初步心理测量评估
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jan;86(1):57-71. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000233200.43822.21.
10
The use of focus groups in the development of the KIDSCREEN HRQL questionnaire.焦点小组在儿童生活质量调查问卷(KIDSCREEN HRQL)编制中的应用。
Qual Life Res. 2006 Oct;15(8):1345-53. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-0022-z. Epub 2006 Jul 7.