Graziola E, Elena G, Gobbo M, Mendez F, Colucci D, Puig N
Departamento de Anestesia, Hospital Italiano de Rosario, República Argentina.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2005 Apr;52(4):208-16.
Given the immunomodulatory effects of anesthesia and surgery, 2 anesthetic regimens in clinical use were compared to evaluate hemodynamic, stress, and immunologic response in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Randomized controlled trial in patients classified ASA I and scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were randomly assigned to the inhaled anesthetic group (13 anesthetized with propofol-fentanyl-isoflurane) or the total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) group (14 patients anesthetized with propofol-remifentanil). Patients in both groups received the muscle relaxant vecuronium. We assessed hemodynamic variables, cortisol levels, prolactin, interleukin 6, white cell and lymphocyte counts before, during (1 hour after induction) and after (24 hours and 7 days) surgery.
Hemodynamic variables were stable in both groups. Significant changes in prolactin levels and markers of immune and inflammatory responses between baseline and later measurements occurred in both groups. Patients who received TIVA had no change in cortisol levels at any time during the study. The TIVA group had lower levels of cortisol than did the inhaled anesthesia group (TIVA, 207 [SD, 100] ng/mL; inhaled 293 [97] ng/mL; P<0.05)), higher neutrophil counts (TIVA, 75 [12.5]%; inhaled: 62 [20]%; P<0.05) and higher CD4+ T lymphocyte counts (TIVA, 53 [11.6]%; inhaled: 42 [17.6]%; P<0.001).
Although both techniques afford hemodynamic stability, lower cortisol levels were observed with the application of TIVA with propofol-remifentanil. That would be the technique of choice for patients with compromised immune response.
鉴于麻醉和手术的免疫调节作用,比较两种临床常用麻醉方案,以评估腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的血流动力学、应激和免疫反应。
对美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I级且计划行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者进行随机对照试验。患者被随机分为吸入麻醉组(13例,采用丙泊酚-芬太尼-异氟烷麻醉)或全静脉麻醉(TIVA)组(14例,采用丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼麻醉)。两组患者均使用肌肉松弛剂维库溴铵。我们在手术前、术中(诱导后1小时)和术后(24小时和7天)评估血流动力学变量、皮质醇水平、催乳素、白细胞介素6、白细胞和淋巴细胞计数。
两组患者的血流动力学变量均稳定。两组患者在基线和后续测量之间催乳素水平以及免疫和炎症反应标志物均发生了显著变化。接受TIVA的患者在研究期间任何时间的皮质醇水平均无变化。TIVA组的皮质醇水平低于吸入麻醉组(TIVA组为207[标准差,100]ng/mL;吸入麻醉组为293[97]ng/mL;P<0.05),中性粒细胞计数更高(TIVA组为75[12.5]%;吸入麻醉组为62[20]%;P<0.05),CD4+T淋巴细胞计数更高(TIVA组为53[11.6]%;吸入麻醉组为42[17.6]%;P<0.001)。
尽管两种技术都能实现血流动力学稳定,但应用丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼的TIVA时观察到较低皮质醇水平。对于免疫反应受损的患者,这将是首选技术。