Suppr超能文献

针对青少年和青年的门诊咨询能否改善自我报告的安全习惯?一项随机对照有效性试验。

Does office-based counseling of adolescents and young adults improve self-reported safety habits? A randomized controlled effectiveness trial.

作者信息

Leverence Robert R, Martinez Melissa, Whisler Sandra, Romero-Leggott Valerie, Harji Farzana, Milner Michelle, Voelz Judi

机构信息

The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001, USA.

出版信息

J Adolesc Health. 2005 Jun;36(6):523-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.03.008.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate brief physician advice regarding seatbelt and bicycle helmet use in adolescents and young adults.

METHODS

We recruited 200 patients ages 11-24 years presenting for all visits to a primary care clinic in the Southwestern United States from January 2000 to March 2001. Patients were randomized to control or a single 2- to 3-minute scripted motivational counseling intervention delivered by physicians with an educational brochure and discount helmet coupon. We conducted telephone follow-up evaluation at 3 months. Main outcome measures were self-reported seatbelt and bicycle helmet use assessed on a 4-point Likert scale and attitudes toward these behaviors assessed on a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

For the intervention group, mean Likert scores precounseling and postcounseling for self-reported seatbelt use were 1.3 and 1.4, respectively, with a mean difference of .04 (95% confidence interval [CI], -.1 to .2). For self-reported bicycle helmet use, scores were 3.1 and 3.0, respectively, with a mean difference of .1 (95% CI, -.3 to .2). Combined mean Likert scores measuring subject's attitudes about seat belt use were 13.8 and 14.0, respectively, with a mean difference of .2 (95% CI, -.3 to .6). For bicycle helmet use, scores were 20.0 and 20.9, respectively, with a mean difference of .9 (95% CI, -1.4 to 3.3).

CONCLUSION

We were unable to detect a significant improvement in safety behaviors or attitudes by adolescents and young adults after a brief intervention by physicians during routine office visits.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估医生就青少年和青年使用安全带及自行车头盔给予的简短建议。

方法

我们招募了200名年龄在11至24岁之间的患者,这些患者于2000年1月至2001年3月期间到美国西南部一家初级保健诊所就诊。患者被随机分为对照组或接受由医生提供的一次2至3分钟的有脚本的动机性咨询干预,同时还会收到一份教育手册和一张头盔折扣券。我们在3个月时进行了电话随访评估。主要结局指标是通过4点李克特量表评估的自我报告的安全带和自行车头盔使用情况,以及通过5点李克特量表评估的对这些行为的态度,并采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行分析。

结果

对于干预组,自我报告的安全带使用情况在咨询前和咨询后的平均李克特得分分别为1.3和1.4,平均差异为0.04(95%置信区间[CI],-0.1至0.2)。对于自我报告的自行车头盔使用情况,得分分别为3.1和3.0,平均差异为0.1(95%CI,-0.3至0.2)。衡量受试者对安全带使用态度的综合平均李克特得分分别为13.8和14.0,平均差异为0.2(95%CI,-0.3至0.6)。对于自行车头盔使用情况,得分分别为20.0和20.9,平均差异为0.9(95%CI,-1.4至3.3)。

结论

在常规门诊就诊期间,医生进行简短干预后,我们未能检测到青少年和青年在安全行为或态度方面有显著改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验