Antia Shirin D, Reed Susanne, Kreimeyer Kathryn H
University of Arizona, College of Education, Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation, Tucson, 85721-0069, USA.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2005 Summer;10(3):244-55. doi: 10.1093/deafed/eni026. Epub 2005 May 18.
We obtained data on the writing of 110 deaf or hard-of-hearing students attending public schools who completed the spontaneous writing portion of the Test of Written Language. The average written quotient for the sample was in the below-average range but within 1 standard deviation of the test mean. Forty-nine percent of the sample received written quotients within or above the average range. Mean scores for the three subtests of contextual conventions, contextual language, and story construction were within the low-average range; between 55% and 68% of students scored within the average or above-average range for the subtests. Predictors of writing quotients were eligibility for free lunch, grade, degree of hearing loss and gender; however, only 18% of the variance in total writing quotients was explained by these variables. The data indicate that attention needs to be paid to the writing ability and instruction of many public-school students regardless of degree of hearing loss.
我们获取了110名就读于公立学校的失聪或听力障碍学生的数据,这些学生完成了书面语言测试中的自由写作部分。样本的平均写作商数处于低于平均水平的范围,但在测试均值的1个标准差之内。49%的样本获得的写作商数处于平均范围或以上。情境惯例、情境语言和故事构建这三个子测试的平均分数处于低平均水平范围;在这些子测试中,55%至68%的学生得分处于平均或高于平均范围。写作商数的预测因素包括是否符合免费午餐资格、年级、听力损失程度和性别;然而,这些变量仅解释了总写作商数中18%的方差。数据表明,无论听力损失程度如何,都需要关注许多公立学校学生的写作能力和教学情况。