Schoenfeld Philip, Cash Brooks, Flood Andrew, Dobhan Richard, Eastone John, Coyle Walter, Kikendall James W, Kim Hyungjin Myra, Weiss David G, Emory Theresa, Schatzkin Arthur, Lieberman David
Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Center for Excellence in Health Services Research, Ann Arbor 48105, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2005 May 19;352(20):2061-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042990.
Veterans Affairs (VA) Cooperative Study 380 showed that some advanced colorectal neoplasias (i.e., adenomas at least 1 cm in diameter, villous adenomas, adenomas with high-grade dysplasia, or cancer) in men would be missed with the use of flexible sigmoidoscopy but detected by colonoscopy. In a tandem study, we examined the yield of screening colonoscopy in women.
To determine the prevalence and location of advanced neoplasia, we offered colonoscopy to consecutive asymptomatic women referred for colon-cancer screening. The diagnostic yield of flexible sigmoidoscopy was calculated by estimating the proportion of patients with advanced neoplasia whose lesions would have been identified if they had undergone flexible sigmoidoscopy alone. Lesions were considered detectable by flexible sigmoidoscopy if they were in the distal colon or if they were in the proximal colon in patients who had concurrent small adenomas in the distal colon, a finding that would have led to colonoscopy. The results were compared with the results from VA Cooperative Study 380 for age-matched men and women with negative fecal occult-blood tests and no family history of colon cancer.
Colonoscopy was complete in 1463 women, 230 of whom (15.7 percent) had a family history of colon cancer. Colonoscopy revealed advanced neoplasia in 72 women (4.9 percent). If flexible sigmoidoscopy alone had been performed, advanced neoplasia would have been detected in 1.7 percent of these women (25 of 1463) and missed in 3.2 percent (47 of 1463). Only 35.2 percent of women with advanced neoplasia would have had their lesions identified if they had undergone flexible sigmoidoscopy alone, as compared with 66.3 percent of matched men from VA Cooperative Study 380 (P<0.001).
Colonoscopy may be the preferred method of screening for colorectal cancer in women.
退伍军人事务部(VA)合作研究380表明,对于男性患者,一些晚期结直肠肿瘤(即直径至少1厘米的腺瘤、绒毛状腺瘤、高级别异型增生腺瘤或癌症),使用乙状结肠镜检查会漏诊,但结肠镜检查能够检测出来。在一项串联研究中,我们对女性筛查结肠镜检查的检出率进行了研究。
为了确定晚期肿瘤的患病率和位置,我们为连续转诊来进行结肠癌筛查的无症状女性提供结肠镜检查。乙状结肠镜检查的诊断检出率是通过估计仅接受乙状结肠镜检查时能够发现晚期肿瘤病变的患者比例来计算的。如果病变位于远端结肠,或者患者远端结肠存在同时性小腺瘤(这一发现会导致进行结肠镜检查)且病变位于近端结肠,则认为该病变可通过乙状结肠镜检查发现。将结果与退伍军人事务部合作研究380中年龄匹配、粪便潜血试验阴性且无结肠癌家族史的男性和女性的结果进行比较。
1463名女性完成了结肠镜检查,其中230名(15.7%)有结肠癌家族史。结肠镜检查发现72名女性(4.9%)存在晚期肿瘤。如果仅进行乙状结肠镜检查,这些女性中1.7%(1463名中的25名)的晚期肿瘤会被检测出来,3.2%(1463名中的47名)会被漏诊。如果仅进行乙状结肠镜检查,只有35.2%患有晚期肿瘤的女性其病变会被发现,相比之下,退伍军人事务部合作研究380中匹配男性的这一比例为66.3%(P<0.001)。
结肠镜检查可能是女性结直肠癌筛查的首选方法。