• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无支架与有支架主动脉瓣置换术:左心室质量消退

Stentless vs. stented aortic valve replacement: left ventricular mass regression.

作者信息

Tamim Muhammed, Bové Thierry, Van Belleghem Yves, François Katrien, Taeymans Yves, Van Nooten Guido J

机构信息

Heart Centre, Cardiac Surgery Department, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2005 Jun;13(2):112-8. doi: 10.1177/021849230501300204.

DOI:10.1177/021849230501300204
PMID:15905337
Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the time-related regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after stentless vs. stented aortic valve replacement. From January 1992 to December 2002, 145 patients had a Toronto stentless porcine valve and 106 had a stented Carpentier-Edwards aortic valve replacement. Over a 10-year follow-up, survival was superior in the Toronto group vs. the Carpentier-Edwards group (84% vs. 74% at 4 years; 78% vs. 68% at 6 years; p < 0.001). A significant and constant reduction of peak and mean transvalvular gradients after valve replacement resulted in substantial regression of left ventricular mass index in both groups, which did not reach statistical significance. However, this phenomenon stopped at 3 years, and left ventricular mass index increased slowly after 5 years. Stentless and stented bioprostheses both showed good early and late clinical and hemodynamic outcomes, with the advantage of better midterm survival for stentless xenografts.

摘要

这项回顾性研究的目的是评估无支架与有支架主动脉瓣置换术后左心室肥厚的时间相关消退情况。从1992年1月至2002年12月,145例患者接受了多伦多无支架猪瓣膜置换,106例患者接受了有支架的Carpentier-Edwards主动脉瓣置换。在10年的随访中,多伦多组的生存率高于Carpentier-Edwards组(4年时分别为84%和74%;6年时分别为78%和68%;p<0.001)。瓣膜置换术后跨瓣峰值和平均梯度显著且持续降低,导致两组左心室质量指数大幅消退,但未达到统计学显著性。然而,这种现象在3年后停止,5年后左心室质量指数缓慢增加。无支架和有支架生物假体均显示出良好的早期和晚期临床及血流动力学结果,无支架异种移植物在中期生存方面具有更好的优势。

相似文献

1
Stentless vs. stented aortic valve replacement: left ventricular mass regression.无支架与有支架主动脉瓣置换术:左心室质量消退
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2005 Jun;13(2):112-8. doi: 10.1177/021849230501300204.
2
Stentless and stented aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: Factors affecting midterm clinical and hemodynamical outcome.老年患者的无支架和带支架主动脉瓣置换术:影响中期临床和血流动力学结果的因素。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Nov;30(5):706-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.07.017. Epub 2006 Sep 6.
3
Full-root aortic valve replacement with stentless xenograft achieves superior regression of left ventricular hypertrophy compared to pericardial stented aortic valves.与心包带支架主动脉瓣相比,采用无支架异种移植物进行全根主动脉瓣置换可使左心室肥厚得到更显著的消退。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Feb 3;10:15. doi: 10.1186/s13019-015-0219-8.
4
Stentless aortic valves are hemodynamically superior to stented valves during mid-term follow-up: a large retrospective study.无支架主动脉瓣在中期随访期间血流动力学上优于有支架瓣膜:一项大型回顾性研究。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Dec;80(6):2180-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.05.055.
5
Haemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression: a comparison of the stentless, stented and mechanical aortic valve replacement.血流动力学与左心室质量回归:无支架、有支架及机械主动脉瓣置换术的比较
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998 May;13(5):572-5. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(98)00058-x.
6
Biological aortic valve replacement: advantages and optimal indications of stentless compared to stented valve substitutes. A review.生物主动脉瓣置换术:与带支架瓣膜替代品相比,无支架瓣膜的优势及最佳适应证。综述
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 May;66(5):247-256. doi: 10.1007/s11748-018-0884-3. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
7
Prospective randomized evaluation of stentless vs. stented aortic biologic prosthetic valves in the elderly at five years.老年患者无支架与带支架主动脉生物人工瓣膜五年前瞻性随机评估。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Apr;8(4):449-53. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2008.181362. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
8
The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.置于冠状动脉下位置的多伦多无支架瓣膜在血流动力学上优于镶嵌式带支架完全瓣环上生物假体。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2005 Nov;14(6):814-21; discussion 821.
9
Retrospective clinical analysis of stented vs. stentless porcine aortic bioprostheses.带支架与无支架猪主动脉生物瓣膜的回顾性临床分析
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000 Jul;18(1):46-53. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00416-4.
10
Left ventricular mass reduction after aortic valve replacement: homografts, stentless and stented valves.主动脉瓣置换术后左心室质量减轻:同种异体移植物、无支架瓣膜和有支架瓣膜。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Apr;67(4):966-71. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00215-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A propensity matched analysis of outcomes and long term survival in stented versus stentless valves.对有支架瓣膜与无支架瓣膜的结局和长期生存情况进行倾向匹配分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 May 31;12(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13019-017-0608-2.
2
Stentless aortic valve replacement: an update.无支架主动脉瓣置换术:最新进展
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:345-51. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S11253. Epub 2011 Jun 2.