• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PrimeAnswers:一个用于回答基层医疗问题的实用界面。

PrimeAnswers: A practical interface for answering primary care questions.

作者信息

Ketchell Debra S, St Anna Leilani, Kauff David, Gaster Barak, Timberlake Diane

机构信息

ML, Stanford University Medical Center, Lane Medical Library, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room L109, Stanford, CA, 94305-5123, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Sep-Oct;12(5):537-45. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1601. Epub 2005 May 19.

DOI:10.1197/jamia.M1601
PMID:15905488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1205602/
Abstract

This paper describes an institutional approach taken to build a primary care reference portal. The objective for the site is to make access to and use of clinical reference faster and easier and to facilitate the use of evidence-based answers in daily practice. Reference objects were selected and metadata applied to a core set of sources. Metadata were used to search, sort, and filter results and to define deep-linked queries and structure the interface. User feedback resulted in an expansion in the scope of reference objects to meet the broad spectrum of information needs, including patient handouts and interactive risk management tools. RESULTS of a user satisfaction survey suggest that a simple interface to customized content makes it faster and easier for primary care clinicians to find information during the clinic day and to improve care to their patients. The PrimeAnswers portal is a first step in creating a fast search of a customized set of reference objects to match a clinician's patient care questions in the clinic. The next step is developing methods to solve the problem of matching a clinician's question to a specific answer through precise retrieval from reference sources; however, lack of internal structure and Web service standards in most clinical reference sources is an unresolved problem.

摘要

本文描述了一种构建初级保健参考门户的机构性方法。该网站的目标是使临床参考的获取和使用更快、更便捷,并促进在日常实践中使用基于证据的答案。选择了参考对象,并将元数据应用于一组核心来源。元数据用于搜索、排序和筛选结果,定义深度链接查询并构建界面。用户反馈促使参考对象的范围得以扩展,以满足广泛的信息需求,包括患者手册和交互式风险管理工具。用户满意度调查结果表明,一个通向定制内容的简单界面使初级保健临床医生在门诊日查找信息以及改善对患者的护理变得更快、更容易。PrimeAnswers门户是创建对一组定制参考对象进行快速搜索以匹配临床医生在门诊中患者护理问题的第一步。下一步是开发方法,通过从参考来源进行精确检索来解决将临床医生的问题与特定答案相匹配的问题;然而,大多数临床参考来源缺乏内部结构和网络服务标准仍是一个未解决的问题。

相似文献

1
PrimeAnswers: A practical interface for answering primary care questions.PrimeAnswers:一个用于回答基层医疗问题的实用界面。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Sep-Oct;12(5):537-45. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1601. Epub 2005 May 19.
2
Use, usability, usefulness, and impact of an infobutton manager.信息按钮管理器的使用、可用性、有用性及影响
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:151-5.
3
Evaluation of three point-of-care healthcare databases: BMJ Point-of-Care, Clin-eguide and Nursing Reference Centre.三种即时医疗保健数据库的评估:BMJ 即时医疗、Clin-eguide 和 Nursing Reference Centre。
Health Info Libr J. 2011 Mar;28(1):50-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2010.00920.x. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
4
A comparison of answer retrieval through four evidence-based textbooks (ACP PIER, Essential Evidence Plus, First Consult, and UpToDate): a randomized controlled trial.通过四本循证医学教科书(ACP PIER、Essential Evidence Plus、First Consult 和 UpToDate)检索答案的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Med Teach. 2011;33(9):724-30. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.531155.
5
Can cognitive biases during consumer health information searches be reduced to improve decision making?消费者健康信息搜索过程中的认知偏差能否减少以改善决策?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):54-65. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2557. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
6
Metadata element set in a quality-controlled subject gateway: a step to a health semantic Web.质量控制主题网关中的元数据元素集:迈向健康语义网的一步。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003;95:707-12.
7
Information needs, Infobutton Manager use, and satisfaction by clinician type: a case study.不同临床医生类型的信息需求、信息按钮管理器使用情况及满意度:一项案例研究
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):140-2. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2746. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
8
Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.面向医疗保险人群的远程医疗:儿科、产科及临床医生间接居家干预措施
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001 Aug(24 Suppl):1-32.
9
NeuroExtract: facilitating neuroscience-oriented retrieval from broadly-focused bioscience databases using text-based query mediation.神经提取:通过基于文本的查询调解,促进从广泛的生物科学数据库中进行面向神经科学的检索。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 May-Jun;14(3):355-60. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2321. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
10
Practical guide when searching for answers: how to find the right articles.寻找答案时的实用指南:如何找到合适的文章。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Jul;137(1):5-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.04.018.

引用本文的文献

1
e-Health preparedness assessment in the context of an influenza pandemic: a qualitative study in China.电子健康准备情况评估在流感大流行背景下的研究:中国的一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 Mar 13;3(3):e002293. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002293.
2
Redesign of the Columbia University Infobutton Manager.哥伦比亚大学信息按钮管理器的重新设计。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007 Oct 11;2007:135-9.
3
A partnership in teaching evidence-based medicine to interns at the University of Washington Medical Center.华盛顿大学医学中心在向实习生教授循证医学方面的一项合作。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2007 Jul;95(3):283-6. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.95.3.283.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of expert searching in the Family Physicians' Inquiries Network (FPIN).专家检索在家庭医生咨询网络(FPIN)中的作用。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Jan;93(1):88-96.
2
Do online information retrieval systems help experienced clinicians answer clinical questions?在线信息检索系统能帮助经验丰富的临床医生回答临床问题吗?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 May-Jun;12(3):315-21. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1717. Epub 2005 Jan 31.
3
Why do residents fail to answer their clinical questions? A qualitative study of barriers to practicing evidence-based medicine.住院医师为何不回答他们的临床问题?一项关于实施循证医学障碍的定性研究。
Acad Med. 2005 Feb;80(2):176-82. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200502000-00016.
4
Providing evidence-based answers to complex clinical questions: evaluating the consistency of article selection.为复杂的临床问题提供循证答案:评估文章选择的一致性
Acad Med. 2005 Jan;80(1):109-14. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200501000-00025.
5
Residents' patient-specific clinical questions: opportunities for evidence-based learning.住院医师针对患者的临床问题:循证学习的机会。
Acad Med. 2005 Jan;80(1):51-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200501000-00013.
6
Answering physicians' clinical questions: obstacles and potential solutions.回答医生的临床问题:障碍与潜在解决方案。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Mar-Apr;12(2):217-24. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1608. Epub 2004 Nov 23.
7
Finding the answers in primary care: information seeking by rural and nonrural clinicians.在基层医疗中寻找答案:农村和非农村临床医生的信息寻求行为
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 2):1133-7.
8
Clinicians' assessments of the usefulness of online evidence to answer clinical questions.临床医生对在线证据用于回答临床问题的有用性评估。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):297-300.
9
Overcoming information overload: an information system for the primary care physician.克服信息过载:面向基层医疗医生的信息系统。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):273-6.
10
An analysis of patient care questions asked by pediatricians at an academic medical center.对某学术医疗中心儿科医生提出的患者护理问题的分析。
Ambul Pediatr. 2004 Jan-Feb;4(1):18-23. doi: 10.1367/1539-4409(2004)004<0018:aaopcq>2.0.co;2.