• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Consensual validity parameters of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman personality questionnaire: evidence from self-reports and spouse reports.

作者信息

Gomà-i-Freixanet Montserrat, Wismeijer Andreas A J, Valero Sergi

机构信息

Department of Health Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2005 Jun;84(3):279-86. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_07.

DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_07
PMID:15907164
Abstract

One way of validating questionnaire responses is correlating them with ratings made by external assessors who know the ratee well: This is known as consensual validity. In this study, we assessed the consensual validity of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ; Zuckerman, 2002; Zuckerman, Kuhlman, Joireman, Teta, & Kraft, 1993). A multitrait-multimethod matrix of self-reported and spouse reported personality ratings was used to establish convergent and discriminant validity by means of Campbell and Fiske's (1959) evaluative criteria. Self-reports of 86 men and 85 women were correlated with their spouses' reports. Intraclass correlations ranged from .47 to .63 for the 5 dimensions, providing strong evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. The results obtained favor the use of the ZKPQ as a valid self-report measure of personality traits.

摘要

相似文献

1
Consensual validity parameters of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman personality questionnaire: evidence from self-reports and spouse reports.
J Pers Assess. 2005 Jun;84(3):279-86. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_07.
2
Structural analysis of the facets and domains of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ) and the NEO PI-R.对 Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja 人格问卷(ZKA-PQ)和 NEO PI-R 的面和域进行结构分析。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(2):156-63. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.645935.
3
Diagnostic validity of ICD-10 personality dimensions: a multitrait-multimethod analysis of two self-report questionnaires and a structured interview.ICD-10 人格维度的诊断有效性:两个自陈式问卷和一个结构化访谈的多特质-多方法分析。
Psychopathology. 2010;43(2):110-20. doi: 10.1159/000277000. Epub 2010 Jan 23.
4
Psychometric Properties and Normative Data of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire in a Psychiatric Outpatient Sample.精神科门诊样本中祖克曼-库尔曼人格问卷的心理测量特性及常模数据
J Pers Assess. 2017 Mar-Apr;99(2):219-224. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1217419. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
5
Development of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ): a factor/facet version of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ).《Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja 人格问卷(ZKA-PQ)的编制:Zuckerman-Kuhlman 人格问卷(ZKPQ)的因子/方面版本》。
J Pers Assess. 2010 Sep;92(5):416-31. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.497406.
6
The Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire predicts functioning styles of personality disorder: a trial in healthy subjects and personality-disorder patients.《祖克曼-库尔曼人格问卷》预测人格障碍的功能模式:一项在健康受试者和人格障碍患者中的试验。
Psychiatry Res. 2011 Apr 30;186(2-3):320-5. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.07.010. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
7
Spanish normative data of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire in a general population sample.
Psicothema. 2008 May;20(2):324-30.
8
Construct validity of the Perceived Criticism Measure.感知批评量表的结构效度。
Behav Ther. 2009 Jun;40(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 Nov 3.
9
Personality development in emerging adulthood: integrating evidence from self-ratings and spouse ratings.成年初期的人格发展:整合来自自我评分和配偶评分的证据
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(5):959-74. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.959.
10
The Estonian Self-Consciousness Scale and its relation to the five-factor model of personality.爱沙尼亚自我意识量表及其与人格五因素模型的关系。
J Pers Assess. 1998 Feb;70(1):109-24. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa7001_8.

引用本文的文献

1
Unequal gains from remote work during COVID-19 between spouses: Evidence from longitudinal data in Singapore.新冠疫情期间配偶间远程工作收益不平等:来自新加坡纵向数据的证据
PLoS One. 2025 May 20;20(5):e0324113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324113. eCollection 2025.
2
Personality Factors and Subjective Cognitive Decline: The FACEHBI Cohort.人格因素与主观认知下降:FACEHBI 队列研究。
Behav Neurol. 2020 Feb 19;2020:5232184. doi: 10.1155/2020/5232184. eCollection 2020.
3
Collateral Report of Psychopathy: Convergent and Divergent Validity of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Short Form.
精神病态的附带报告:《精神病态人格问卷简版》的聚合效度和区分效度
J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2015 Jul 1;26(4):476-492. doi: 10.1080/14789949.2015.1018926.
4
Personality structure in brown capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella): comparisons with chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), orangutans (Pongo spp.), and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).褐卷尾猴(Sapajus apella)的个性结构:与黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)、猩猩(Pongo spp.)和恒河猴(Macaca mulatta)的比较。
J Comp Psychol. 2013 Aug;127(3):282-98. doi: 10.1037/a0031723. Epub 2013 May 13.
5
Individual differences in drug abuse vulnerability: d-amphetamine and sensation-seeking status.药物滥用易感性的个体差异:右旋苯丙胺与寻求刺激状态。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Nov;189(1):17-25. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0487-z. Epub 2006 Sep 14.