• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《冠心病国家服务框架》对急性冠脉综合征患者治疗及预后的影响

Impact of the National Service Framework for coronary heart disease on treatment and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes.

作者信息

Graham J J, Timmis A, Cooper J, Ramdany S, Deaner A, Ranjadayalan K, Knight C

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Barts and the London NHS Trust, London Chest Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Heart. 2006 Mar;92(3):301-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.051466. Epub 2005 May 20.

DOI:10.1136/hrt.2004.051466
PMID:15908481
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1860838/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact the National Service Framework (NSF) for coronary heart disease has had on emergency treatment and outcomes in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Coronary care units of two district general hospitals.

RESULTS

Data from 3371 patients were recorded, 1993 patients in the 27 months before the introduction of the NSF and 1378 patients in the 24 months afterwards. After the introduction of the NSF in-hospital mortality was significantly reduced (95 patients (4.8%) v 43 (3.2%), p = 0.02). This was associated with a reduction in the development of Q wave myocardial infarction (40.6% v 33.3%, p < 0.0001) and in the incidence of left ventricular failure (15.9% v 12.3%, p = 0.003). The proportion of patients receiving thrombolysis increased (69.4% v 84.7%, p < 0.0001) with a decrease in the time taken to receive it (proportion thrombolysed within 20 minutes 12.1% v 26.6%, p < 0.0001). The prescription of beta blockers (51.9% v 65.8%, p < 0.0001), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (37% v 66.4%, p < 0.0001), and statins (55.2% v 72.7%, p < 0.0001) improved and the proportion of patients referred for invasive investigation increased (18.3% v 27.0%, p < 0.0001). Trend analysis showed that improvements in mortality and thrombolysis were directly associated with publication of the NSF, whereas the improvements seen in prescription of beta blockers and statins were the continuation of pre-existing trends.

CONCLUSIONS

In the two years that followed publication of the NSF the initial treatment and outcome of patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes improved. Some of the improvements can be attributed to the NSF but others are continuations of pre-existing trends.

摘要

目的

评估冠心病国家服务框架(NSF)对急性冠状动脉综合征患者的急诊治疗及治疗结果的影响。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

两家地区综合医院的冠心病监护病房。

结果

记录了3371例患者的数据,在NSF实施前的27个月中有1993例患者,之后的24个月中有1378例患者。NSF实施后,院内死亡率显著降低(95例患者(4.8%)对43例(3.2%),p = 0.02)。这与Q波心肌梗死发生率的降低(40.6%对33.3%,p < 0.0001)和左心室衰竭发生率的降低(15.9%对12.3%,p = 0.003)相关。接受溶栓治疗的患者比例增加(69.4%对84.7%,p < 0.0001),且接受溶栓治疗的时间缩短(20分钟内接受溶栓治疗的比例为12.1%对26.6%,p < 0.0001)。β受体阻滞剂(51.9%对65.8%,p < 0.0001)、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(37%对66.4%,p < 0.0001)和他汀类药物(55.2%对72.7%,p < 0.0001)的处方情况有所改善,接受侵入性检查的患者比例增加(18.3%对27.0%,p < 0.0001)。趋势分析表明,死亡率和溶栓治疗的改善与NSF的发布直接相关,而β受体阻滞剂和他汀类药物处方的改善是先前趋势的延续。

结论

在NSF发布后的两年里,急性冠状动脉综合征患者的初始治疗及治疗结果有所改善。部分改善可归因于NSF,但其他改善是先前趋势的延续。

相似文献

1
Impact of the National Service Framework for coronary heart disease on treatment and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes.《冠心病国家服务框架》对急性冠脉综合征患者治疗及预后的影响
Heart. 2006 Mar;92(3):301-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.051466. Epub 2005 May 20.
2
Improving care for patients with acute coronary syndromes: initial results from the National Audit of Myocardial Infarction Project (MINAP).改善急性冠脉综合征患者的护理:心肌梗死国家审计项目(MINAP)的初步结果。
Heart. 2004 Sep;90(9):1004-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.034470.
3
Comparison of outcomes in acute coronary syndrome in patients receiving statins within 24 hours of onset versus at later times.
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Nov 1;94(9):1166-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.07.085.
4
Adherence to evidence-based therapies after discharge for acute coronary syndromes: an ongoing prospective, observational study.急性冠状动脉综合征出院后对循证疗法的依从性:一项正在进行的前瞻性观察研究。
Am J Med. 2004 Jul 15;117(2):73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.12.041.
5
Treatment and secondary prevention of ischemic coronary events in Croatia (TASPIC-CRO study).克罗地亚缺血性冠状动脉事件的治疗与二级预防(TASPIC-CRO研究)
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006 Aug;13(4):646-54. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000183910.59741.96.
6
Invasive vs non-invasive treatment in acute coronary syndromes and prior bypass surgery.急性冠状动脉综合征及既往搭桥手术后的侵入性治疗与非侵入性治疗
Int J Cardiol. 2007 Jun 25;119(1):65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.07.058. Epub 2006 Oct 12.
7
Impact of prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction on 1-year outcome: results from the French Nationwide USIC 2000 Registry.院前溶栓治疗对急性心肌梗死1年预后的影响:来自法国全国性USIC 2000注册研究的结果
Circulation. 2004 Oct 5;110(14):1909-15. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000143144.82338.36. Epub 2004 Sep 27.
8
The incidence, treatment strategies and outcomes of acute coronary syndromes in the "reperfusion network" of different hospital types in the Czech Republic: results of the Czech evaluation of acute coronary syndromes in hospitalized patients (CZECH) registry.捷克共和国不同医院类型“再灌注网络”中急性冠脉综合征的发病率、治疗策略及转归:捷克住院患者急性冠脉综合征评估(CZECH)注册研究结果
Int J Cardiol. 2007 Jul 10;119(2):212-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.02.036. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
9
Adherence to statins, beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors following a first cardiovascular event: a retrospective cohort study.首次心血管事件后他汀类药物、β受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的依从性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Can J Cardiol. 2005 May 1;21(6):485-8.
10
Evidence-based medication and revascularization: powerful tools in the management of patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease: a report from the Euro Heart Survey on diabetes and the heart.基于证据的药物治疗和血运重建:糖尿病和冠心病患者管理的有力工具:欧洲心脏调查糖尿病与心脏报告
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008 Apr;15(2):216-23. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282f335d0.

引用本文的文献

1
Anemia or other comorbidities? using machine learning to reveal deeper insights into the drivers of acute coronary syndromes in hospital admitted patients.贫血或其他合并症?利用机器学习揭示住院患者急性冠状动脉综合征的驱动因素的更深层次见解。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 24;17(1):e0262997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262997. eCollection 2022.
2
Evaluation of the Methods and Management of Acute Coronary Events (EMMACE)-3: protocol for a longitudinal study.急性冠状动脉事件的方法与管理评估(EMMACE)-3:一项纵向研究的方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 23;5(6):e006256. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006256.
3
Impact of health care initiatives on outcomes of acute coronary syndromes.医疗保健举措对急性冠状动脉综合征结局的影响。
Heart. 2006 Mar;92(3):293-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.058305.
4
The National Service Framework: six years on.《国家服务框架》:实施六年后。
Heart. 2006 Mar;92(3):291-2. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.066043. Epub 2005 Nov 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical governance: vision or mirage?临床治理:愿景还是幻影?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2002 May;8(2):243-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2002.00322.x.
2
Heart disease, guidelines, regulations, and the law.心脏病、指南、法规与法律。
Heart. 2002 May;87(5):472-9. doi: 10.1136/heart.87.5.472.
3
National service framework for coronary heart disease: audit of English hospitals.冠心病国家服务框架:对英国医院的审核
BMJ. 2002 Mar 23;324(7339):709. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7339.709.
4
Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂雷米普利对高危患者心血管事件的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 20;342(3):145-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200001203420301.
5
Clinical practice guidelines in unstable angina improve clinical outcomes by assuring early intensive medical treatment.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Nov 15;34(6):1689-95. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00405-2.
6
Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study. FRagmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease Investigators.不稳定型冠状动脉疾病的侵入性治疗与非侵入性治疗比较:FRISC II前瞻性随机多中心研究。冠状动脉疾病不稳定时的法安明与快速血管重建研究组。
Lancet. 1999 Aug 28;354(9180):708-15.
7
Improving the quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.提高医疗保险急性心肌梗死患者的护理质量:合作心血管项目的结果。
JAMA. 1998 May 6;279(17):1351-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.17.1351.
8
Comparison of case fatality in south Asian and white patients after acute myocardial infarction: observational study.南亚和白人患者急性心肌梗死后病死率的比较:观察性研究。
BMJ. 1996 May 25;312(7042):1330-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7042.1330.
9
Short and long term prognosis of acute myocardial infarction since introduction of thrombolysis.自溶栓治疗引入以来急性心肌梗死的短期和长期预后
BMJ. 1993 Aug 7;307(6900):349-53. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6900.349.
10
Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.17187例疑似急性心肌梗死患者静脉注射链激酶、口服阿司匹林、两者并用或两者均不用的随机试验:ISIS-2。ISIS-2(第二次心肌梗死存活国际研究)协作组
Lancet. 1988 Aug 13;2(8607):349-60.