Hellinger Walter C, Bonatti Hugo, Yao Joseph D, Alvarez Salvador, Brumble Lisa M, Keating Michael R, Mendez Julio C, Kramer David J, Dickson Rolland C, Harnois Denise M, Spivey James R, Hughes Christopher B, Nguyen Justin H, Steers Jeffery L
Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Liver Transpl. 2005 Jun;11(6):656-62. doi: 10.1002/lt.20365.
Antifungal prophylaxis has been proposed for liver transplant recipients at increased risk for invasive mold infection. Risk factors for invasive mold infection after liver transplantation were selected to divide recipients into 3 groups: (1) high risk-transplantation on hemodialysis or delay of hospital discharge beyond day 7 after transplantation because of allograft or renal insufficiency; (2) intermediate risk-retransplantation or transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure; (3) low risk-absence of conditions in groups 1 and 2. During an intervention period (February 1999-April 2001), prophylactic administration of a lipid complex of amphotericin (Abelcet) at 5 mg/kg intravenously every 24 to 48 hours was recommended for high-risk recipients. The frequency of mold infection was compared to that of a preintervention period (February 1998-January 1999) when antifungal prophylaxis was not provided. During the intervention period, invasive mold infection developed in 2 (6%) of 35 high-risk recipients, 0 of 28 intermediate-risk recipients, and 1 (0.5%) of 187 low-risk recipients. Overall, of 58 liver transplant recipients, 3 (5%) developed an invasive mold infection during the preintervention period, compared with 3 (1%) of 250 during the intervention period (P = 0.08). The only death from invasive mold infection occurred during the preintervention period. Rates of pulse corticosteroid treatment of rejection and cytomegalovirus infection were lower during the intervention period. In conclusion, readily identifiable patient characteristics can be used to stratify liver transplant recipients for risk of invasive mold infection. Antifungal prophylaxis given to high-risk recipients may provide cost-effective prevention of these infections.
对于侵袭性霉菌感染风险增加的肝移植受者,已有人提出进行抗真菌预防。选择肝移植后侵袭性霉菌感染的风险因素,将受者分为3组:(1)高危组——接受血液透析的移植患者,或因移植肝或肾功能不全导致移植后出院延迟超过7天;(2)中危组——再次移植或因暴发性肝衰竭进行移植的患者;(3)低危组——不存在第1组和第2组中的情况。在一个干预期(1999年2月至2001年4月),建议高危受者每24至48小时静脉注射5mg/kg两性霉素脂质复合物(Abelcet)进行预防性给药。将霉菌感染的发生率与未进行抗真菌预防的干预前期(1998年2月至1999年1月)进行比较。在干预期,35名高危受者中有2名(6%)发生侵袭性霉菌感染,28名中危受者中无感染发生,187名低危受者中有1名(0.5%)发生感染。总体而言,58名肝移植受者中,3名(5%)在干预前期发生侵袭性霉菌感染,而在干预期250名受者中有3名(1%)发生感染(P = 0.08)。唯一一例因侵袭性霉菌感染导致的死亡发生在干预前期。干预期内,因排斥反应和巨细胞病毒感染进行脉冲式皮质类固醇治疗的发生率较低。总之,易于识别的患者特征可用于对肝移植受者侵袭性霉菌感染的风险进行分层。对高危受者进行抗真菌预防可能会提供具有成本效益的感染预防措施。