Chomvarin Chariya, Siripornmongcolchai Taweeporn, Chaicumpar Kunyaluk, Limpaiboon Temduang, Wongkham Chaisiri, Yutanawiboonchai Wiboonchai
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2004 Dec;35(4):879-85.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), is difficult and expensive to treat, therefore early screening is essential. Several phenotypic and genotypic methods are used to detect MRSA; however, the method of choice remains problematic. We have evaluated four phenotypic methods, broth microdilution (MIC), oxacillin disk agar diffusion (ODD), oxacillin screening salt agar (OSS), and a new rapid phenotypic (MRSA screen latex agglutination, MSLA) with the genotypic gold standard of PCR mecA detection to determine the most appropriate method for routine laboratory use. We randomly collected 203 S. aureus isolates from patients and carriers at two hospitals in Thailand. Using MIC method, three sub-groups were differentiated from among these isolates, namely MRSA (106 isolates), borderline-resistant S. aureus (BRSA) (65 isolates), and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA)(32 isolates). A total of 10 methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE) isolates were also included. The sensitivity and specificity of MIC, ODD, OSS, and MSLA were 99 and 96, 100 and 97, 100 and 97, and 100 and 100%, respectively. Our study indicated that ODD is still appropriate for routine laboratory. MSLA had the highest sensitivity and specificity and is rapid but expensive, so is the most appropriate method for emergency cases. MIC method was better for BRSA detection and OSS method was more appropriate for screening clinical specimens and carriers.
耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)治疗困难且费用高昂,因此早期筛查至关重要。有多种表型和基因型方法用于检测MRSA;然而,选择何种方法仍然存在问题。我们评估了四种表型方法,肉汤微量稀释法(MIC)、苯唑西林纸片琼脂扩散法(ODD)、苯唑西林筛选盐琼脂法(OSS)以及一种新的快速表型方法(MRSA筛查乳胶凝集法,MSLA),并与检测mecA基因的基因型金标准PCR方法进行比较,以确定最适合常规实验室使用的方法。我们从泰国两家医院的患者和携带者中随机收集了203株金黄色葡萄球菌分离株。使用MIC方法,从这些分离株中区分出三个亚组,即MRSA(106株)、临界耐药金黄色葡萄球菌(BRSA)(65株)和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)(32株)。还纳入了10株耐甲氧西林表皮葡萄球菌(MRSE)分离株。MIC、ODD、OSS和MSLA的敏感性和特异性分别为99%和96%、100%和97%、100%和97%以及100%和100%。我们的研究表明,ODD仍然适用于常规实验室。MSLA具有最高的敏感性和特异性,且检测快速,但费用高昂,因此是急诊病例的最合适方法。MIC方法更适合检测BRSA,而OSS方法更适合筛查临床标本和携带者。