Patel S M, Stason W B, Legedza A, Ock S M, Kaptchuk T J, Conboy L, Canenguez K, Park J K, Kelly E, Jacobson E, Kerr C E, Lembo A J
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2005 Jun;17(3):332-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2005.00650.x.
Despite the apparent high placebo response rate in randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCT) of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), little is known about the variability and predictors of this response.
To describe the magnitude of response in placebo arms of IBS clinical trials and to identify which factors predict the variability of the placebo response.
We performed a meta-analysis of published, English language, RCT with 20 or more IBS patients who were treated for at least 2 weeks. This analysis is limited to studies that assessed global response (improvement in overall symptoms). The variables considered as potential placebo modifiers were study design, study duration, use of a run-in phase, Jadad score, entry criteria, number of office visits, number of office visits/study duration, use of diagnostic testing, gender, age and type of medication studied.
Forty-five placebo-controlled RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The placebo response ranged from 16.0 to 71.4% with a population-weighted average of 40.2%, 95% CI (35.9-44.4). Significant associations with lower placebo response rates were fulfillment of the Rome criteria for study entry (P=0.049) and an increased number of office visits (P=0.026).
Placebo effects in IBS clinical trials measuring a global outcome are highly variable. Entry criteria and number of office visits are significant predictors of the placebo response. More stringent entry criteria and an increased number of office visits appear to independently decrease the placebo response.
尽管在肠易激综合征(IBS)患者的随机安慰剂对照试验(RCT)中安慰剂反应率明显较高,但对于这种反应的变异性及预测因素知之甚少。
描述IBS临床试验中安慰剂组的反应程度,并确定哪些因素可预测安慰剂反应的变异性。
我们对已发表的、英文的、纳入20名或更多IBS患者且治疗至少2周的RCT进行了荟萃分析。该分析仅限于评估总体反应(整体症状改善情况)的研究。被视为潜在安慰剂调节因素的变量包括研究设计、研究持续时间、导入期的使用、雅达评分、纳入标准、门诊就诊次数、门诊就诊次数/研究持续时间、诊断测试的使用、性别、年龄以及所研究药物的类型。
45项安慰剂对照RCT符合纳入标准。安慰剂反应率在16.0%至71.4%之间,总体加权平均值为40.2%,95%置信区间(35.9 - 44.4)。与较低安慰剂反应率显著相关的因素是符合研究纳入的罗马标准(P = 0.049)以及门诊就诊次数增加(P = 0.026)。
在测量总体结果的IBS临床试验中,安慰剂效应高度可变。纳入标准和门诊就诊次数是安慰剂反应的重要预测因素。更严格的纳入标准和增加门诊就诊次数似乎会独立降低安慰剂反应。