Curth Louise Hill
Department of History, University of Exeter, Amory Building, UK.
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2005 Jul;60(3):255-82. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/jri041.
There has been a great deal of recent interest in popular health care in early modern England, resulting in studies on a range of topics from practitioners through remedial treatment. Over the past decade, the history of books has also attracted growing interest. This is particularly true for the seventeenth century, a period marked by a dramatic rise in all types of printed works. The 1640s are especially significant in the evolution of printed vernacular medical publications, which continued to flourish during the rest of the century. While recent studies on popular medical books have contributed greatly to our understanding of contemporary medical beliefs and practices, they have failed to properly recognize the effect that almanacs had on early modern medicine. Although their primary function was not to disseminate medical information, most provided a great deal of medical information. Furthermore, these cheap, annual publications targeted and were read by a wide cross-section of the public, making them the first true form of British mass media. This article is based on the content of 1,392 almanacs printed between 1640 and 1700, which may make it the largest comparative study of the medical content of any early modern printed works. The project has resulted in two major findings. First of all, almanacs played a major part in the dissemination, continuing popularity, and longevity of traditional astrological and Galenic beliefs and practices. Secondly, at the same time, almanacs played an important early role in the growth of medical materialism in Britain.
近年来,人们对近代早期英国的大众医疗保健产生了浓厚兴趣,引发了从从业者到治疗方法等一系列主题的研究。在过去十年中,书籍史也越来越受到关注。十七世纪尤其如此,这一时期各类印刷作品数量急剧增加。17世纪40年代在印刷的白话医学出版物的发展过程中尤为重要,这类出版物在该世纪其余时间持续繁荣。虽然最近关于大众医学书籍的研究极大地增进了我们对当代医学信仰和实践的理解,但它们未能充分认识到年鉴对近代早期医学的影响。尽管年鉴的主要功能不是传播医学信息,但大多数年鉴都提供了大量医学信息。此外,这些廉价的年度出版物面向广大公众发行并被他们阅读,使其成为英国大众媒体的第一种真正形式。本文基于1640年至1700年间印刷的1392本年鉴的内容,这可能使其成为对近代早期任何印刷作品的医学内容进行的最大规模比较研究。该项目得出了两个主要发现。首先,年鉴在传统占星术和盖伦医学信仰及实践的传播、持续流行和长久存在方面发挥了重要作用。其次,与此同时,年鉴在英国医学唯物论的发展过程中也发挥了重要的早期作用。