Suppr超能文献

用于区分抗焦虑作用的四板重复测试范式。

The four-plates test-retest paradigm to discriminate anxiolytic effects.

作者信息

Ripoll Nadège, Nic Dhonnchadha Bríd Aine, Sébille Véronique, Bourin Michel, Hascoët Martine

机构信息

Neurobiologie de l'anxiété et de la dépression, Faculté de Médecine, EA 3256, 1 rue Gaston Veil, BP 53508, 44035 Nantes cedex 01, France.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Jun;180(1):73-83. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-2130-1. Epub 2005 Jan 26.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Animal models of anxiety such as the four-plates test (FPT) enable the detection of an anxiolytic effect not only of benzodiazepines (BZDs) but also of other non-BZD anxiolytic compounds such as the antidepressants paroxetine and venlafaxine. Retesting mice in animal models of anxiety markedly alters the behavioural profile of various drugs.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was first to investigate the function of GABA(A)/BZD receptor and passive avoidance acquisition in the FPT "test-retest". The second aim of this study was to evaluate the capacity of the FPT to discriminate BZDs from other non-BZD anxiolytics in experienced mice.

METHODS

The FPT was performed in naive and experienced mice (submitted to the test 24 h previously). The drugs studied were two BZDs, diazepam (1 mg/kg) and alprazolam (0.25 mg/kg); flumazenil, a GABA(A) receptor antagonist (8 mg/kg); atropine sulphate, a muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonist (4 mg/kg) known for its amnesic properties; paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (4 and 8 mg/kg); venlafaxine, a serotonin and noradrenalin reuptake inhibitor (4 and 16 mg/kg); and DOI, a 5-HT2A agonist (1 mg/kg).

RESULTS

Our results reveal an increase of anxiety (decrease of punished passages) in saline-experienced mice. Diazepam, alprazolam, paroxetine and venlafaxine did not prevent the increase in anxiety during retest, revealing a passive avoidance acquisition. Flumazenil did not modify the anxiogenic-like behaviour of experienced mice. In contrast, atropine seems to oppose the increase of anxiety; however, its effect is weak and disputable. DOI was the only anxiolytic compound able to oppose the decrease of punished passages of experienced mice.

CONCLUSION

Anxiogenic behaviour on retesting indicates aversive learning. The protocol test-retest is unable to discriminate between the anxiolytic effect of BZDs from that of paroxetine or venlafaxine. However, this modified model may constitute a new tool to investigate other neural pathways implicated in anxiety.

摘要

理论依据

焦虑动物模型,如四板试验(FPT),不仅能够检测苯二氮䓬类药物(BZDs)的抗焦虑作用,还能检测其他非苯二氮䓬类抗焦虑化合物的抗焦虑作用,如抗抑郁药帕罗西汀和文拉法辛。在焦虑动物模型中对小鼠进行重新测试会显著改变各种药物的行为特征。

目的

本研究的目的首先是在FPT“重复测试”中研究GABA(A)/BZD受体的功能和被动回避学习。本研究的第二个目的是评估FPT区分苯二氮䓬类药物和其他非苯二氮䓬类抗焦虑药物对经受过测试的小鼠的作用的能力。

方法

在未经历过测试的小鼠和经受过测试的小鼠(24小时前接受过测试)中进行FPT。所研究的药物有两种苯二氮䓬类药物,地西泮(1毫克/千克)和阿普唑仑(0.25毫克/千克);氟马西尼,一种GABA(A)受体拮抗剂(8毫克/千克);硫酸阿托品,一种毒蕈碱胆碱能受体拮抗剂(4毫克/千克),以其失忆特性而闻名;帕罗西汀,一种选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(4和8毫克/千克);文拉法辛,一种5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(4和16毫克/千克);以及DOI,一种5-HT2A激动剂(1毫克/千克)。

结果

我们的结果显示,经受过生理盐水注射的小鼠焦虑增加(受罚通过次数减少)。地西泮、阿普唑仑、帕罗西汀和文拉法辛在重新测试期间未能阻止焦虑增加,显示出被动回避学习。氟马西尼未改变经受过测试的小鼠的致焦虑样行为。相比之下,阿托品似乎对抗焦虑增加;然而,其作用微弱且存在争议。DOI是唯一一种能够对抗经受过测试的小鼠受罚通过次数减少的抗焦虑化合物。

结论

重新测试时的致焦虑行为表明存在厌恶学习。重复测试方案无法区分苯二氮䓬类药物与帕罗西汀或文拉法辛的抗焦虑作用。然而,这种改良模型可能构成一种研究与焦虑有关的其他神经通路的新工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验