• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病教育工作者:对不断发展的实践的评估

Diabetes educators: assessment of evolving practice.

作者信息

Barlow Susan, Crean John, Heizler Alissa, Mulcahy Kathy, Springer Jane

机构信息

Amylin Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, California

出版信息

Diabetes Educ. 2005 May-Jun;31(3):359-72. doi: 10.1177/0145721705276572.

DOI:10.1177/0145721705276572
PMID:15919637
Abstract

A survey evaluating the professional characteristics and practice patterns of diabetes educators was distributed across the United States. The specific survey aims were to assess whether (1) there continues to be a growing trend among US health professionals who consider themselves diabetes educators to obtain certification as certified diabetes educators (CDEs), (2) duties/services associated with diabetes self-management training (DSMT) and medical/medication management differ between diabetes educators who are CDEs versus those who are non-CDEs, and (3) educator practice patterns differ across the major geographic regions of the United States. Of the 507 diabetes educators completing the survey, 83% identified themselves as CDEs. Diabetes educators responding to similar surveys done in 1992 and 1999, 51% and 63%, respectively, identified themselves as CDEs. In this survey, a similar percentage of CDEs and non-CDEs employed DSMT practices of relatively low complexity (eg, general diabetes education) whereas a significantly higher percentage (P < .001) of CDEs employed DSMT practices of relatively high complexity (eg, insulin pump training). Significantly (P < .001) more CDEs provided medical/medication management services compared to non-CDEs. Finally, the practice patterns among CDEs were minimally influenced by region of the country. These results suggest that (1) the trend toward increased certification among diabetes educators has continued, (2) certification is associated with a greater likelihood of delivering complex DSMT services and medical/medication management, and (3) this pattern is consistent across the nation as a whole.

摘要

一项评估糖尿病教育工作者专业特征和实践模式的调查在美国各地展开。该调查的具体目的是评估:(1)在美国自认为是糖尿病教育工作者的卫生专业人员中,获得认证糖尿病教育者(CDE)认证的人数是否持续呈增长趋势;(2)CDE糖尿病教育者与非CDE糖尿病教育者在糖尿病自我管理培训(DSMT)以及医疗/药物管理方面的职责/服务是否存在差异;(3)美国主要地理区域的教育者实践模式是否存在差异。在完成调查的507名糖尿病教育工作者中,83%称自己为CDE。在1992年和1999年进行的类似调查中,分别有51%和63%的糖尿病教育工作者称自己为CDE。在本次调查中,CDE和非CDE采用相对低复杂度DSMT实践(如一般糖尿病教育)的比例相近,而采用相对高复杂度DSMT实践(如胰岛素泵培训)的CDE比例显著更高(P <.001)。与非CDE相比,提供医疗/药物管理服务的CDE显著更多(P <.001)。最后,CDE的实践模式受所在地区的影响极小。这些结果表明:(1)糖尿病教育工作者中认证人数增加的趋势仍在持续;(2)认证与提供复杂DSMT服务和医疗/药物管理的可能性更大相关;(3)这种模式在全国范围内是一致的。

相似文献

1
Diabetes educators: assessment of evolving practice.糖尿病教育工作者:对不断发展的实践的评估
Diabetes Educ. 2005 May-Jun;31(3):359-72. doi: 10.1177/0145721705276572.
2
Evolving roles: from diabetes educators to advanced diabetes managers.角色演变:从糖尿病教育者到高级糖尿病管理者。
Diabetes Educ. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4):598-602, 604, 606 passim. doi: 10.1177/014572170302900407.
3
The 1999 Scope of Practice for Diabetes Educators and the Standards of Practice for Diabetes Educators. American Association of Diabetes Educators.
Diabetes Educ. 2000 May-Jun;26(3):519-25. doi: 10.1177/014572170002600316.
4
The scope of practice of diabetes educators in the state of Georgia.
Diabetes Educ. 1999 Jan-Feb;25(1):56-64. doi: 10.1177/014572179902500108.
5
The 2017 Diabetes Educator and the Diabetes Self-Management Education National Practice Survey.2017 年糖尿病教育者和糖尿病自我管理教育国家实践调查。
Diabetes Educ. 2018 Jun;44(3):260-268. doi: 10.1177/0145721718765446. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
6
The Diabetes Educator and the Diabetes Self-management Education Engagement: The 2015 National Practice Survey.糖尿病教育者与糖尿病自我管理教育参与度:2015年全国实践调查
Diabetes Educ. 2015 Oct;41(5):616-24. doi: 10.1177/0145721715599268. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
7
What is the standard of care for nurses?护士的护理标准是什么?
Okla Nurse. 2006 Jun-Aug;51(2):12-3.
8
APRN licensure versus APRN certification: what is the difference?高级实践注册护士执照与高级实践注册护士认证:有何区别?
JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul. 2008 Oct-Dec;10(4):90-3. doi: 10.1097/NHL.0b013e31818ede05.
9
Are patients with diabetes receiving the same message from dietitians and nurses?糖尿病患者从营养师和护士那里得到的信息相同吗?
Diabetes Educ. 2004 Mar-Apr;30(2):293-300. doi: 10.1177/014572170403000222.
10
Diabetes education outcomes: what educators are doing.糖尿病教育成果:教育工作者正在做的事情。
Diabetes Educ. 2000 Nov-Dec;26(6):951-4. doi: 10.1177/014572170002600607.

引用本文的文献

1
The factors that limit activities of certified diabetes educators in Japan: a questionnaire survey.日本认证糖尿病教育者活动的限制因素:一项问卷调查
Springerplus. 2014 Oct 17;3:611. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-611. eCollection 2014.
2
Methodology and feasibility of a structured education program for diabetes education in India: The National Diabetes Educator Program.印度糖尿病教育结构化教育项目的方法与可行性:国家糖尿病教育者项目
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013 May;17(3):396-401. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.111610.