Barlow Susan, Crean John, Heizler Alissa, Mulcahy Kathy, Springer Jane
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, California
Diabetes Educ. 2005 May-Jun;31(3):359-72. doi: 10.1177/0145721705276572.
A survey evaluating the professional characteristics and practice patterns of diabetes educators was distributed across the United States. The specific survey aims were to assess whether (1) there continues to be a growing trend among US health professionals who consider themselves diabetes educators to obtain certification as certified diabetes educators (CDEs), (2) duties/services associated with diabetes self-management training (DSMT) and medical/medication management differ between diabetes educators who are CDEs versus those who are non-CDEs, and (3) educator practice patterns differ across the major geographic regions of the United States. Of the 507 diabetes educators completing the survey, 83% identified themselves as CDEs. Diabetes educators responding to similar surveys done in 1992 and 1999, 51% and 63%, respectively, identified themselves as CDEs. In this survey, a similar percentage of CDEs and non-CDEs employed DSMT practices of relatively low complexity (eg, general diabetes education) whereas a significantly higher percentage (P < .001) of CDEs employed DSMT practices of relatively high complexity (eg, insulin pump training). Significantly (P < .001) more CDEs provided medical/medication management services compared to non-CDEs. Finally, the practice patterns among CDEs were minimally influenced by region of the country. These results suggest that (1) the trend toward increased certification among diabetes educators has continued, (2) certification is associated with a greater likelihood of delivering complex DSMT services and medical/medication management, and (3) this pattern is consistent across the nation as a whole.
一项评估糖尿病教育工作者专业特征和实践模式的调查在美国各地展开。该调查的具体目的是评估:(1)在美国自认为是糖尿病教育工作者的卫生专业人员中,获得认证糖尿病教育者(CDE)认证的人数是否持续呈增长趋势;(2)CDE糖尿病教育者与非CDE糖尿病教育者在糖尿病自我管理培训(DSMT)以及医疗/药物管理方面的职责/服务是否存在差异;(3)美国主要地理区域的教育者实践模式是否存在差异。在完成调查的507名糖尿病教育工作者中,83%称自己为CDE。在1992年和1999年进行的类似调查中,分别有51%和63%的糖尿病教育工作者称自己为CDE。在本次调查中,CDE和非CDE采用相对低复杂度DSMT实践(如一般糖尿病教育)的比例相近,而采用相对高复杂度DSMT实践(如胰岛素泵培训)的CDE比例显著更高(P <.001)。与非CDE相比,提供医疗/药物管理服务的CDE显著更多(P <.001)。最后,CDE的实践模式受所在地区的影响极小。这些结果表明:(1)糖尿病教育工作者中认证人数增加的趋势仍在持续;(2)认证与提供复杂DSMT服务和医疗/药物管理的可能性更大相关;(3)这种模式在全国范围内是一致的。