Acute myocardial infarction: the case for pre-hospital thrombolysis with or without percutaneous coronary intervention.
作者信息
Schofield P M
机构信息
Papworth Hospital NHS Trust, Papworth Everard, Cambridge CB3 8RE, UK.
出版信息
Heart. 2005 Jun;91 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii7-11. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.058529.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Acute myocardial infarction: the case for pre-hospital thrombolysis with or without percutaneous coronary intervention.急性心肌梗死：院前溶栓联合或不联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的情况
Heart. 2005 Jun;91 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii7-11. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.058529.
2
ER TIMI-19: testing the reality of prehospital thrombolysis.
J Emerg Med. 2000 Oct;19(3 Suppl):21S-25S. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(00)00251-1.
3
ST-segment recovery and prognosis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction reperfused by prehospital combination fibrinolysis, prehospital initiated facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention, or primary percutaneous coronary intervention.院前联合溶栓、院前启动的易化经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗再灌注的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的ST段恢复情况及预后
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Nov 1;98(9):1132-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.05.044. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
4
Stenting versus thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction trial (STAT).急性心肌梗死支架置入术与溶栓治疗对比试验（STAT）
Indian Heart J. 2001 May-Jun;53(3):375.
5
[The optimal time window for percutaneous coronary intervention in thrombolysis-treated ST-elevation myocardial infarction].[溶栓治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的最佳时间窗]
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2010 Sep;11(9):670-3.
6
Tenecteplase in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.
Indian Heart J. 2009 Sep-Oct;61(5):437-42.
7
Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗失败后的挽救性血管成形术。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 29;353(26):2758-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050849.
8
9
Prehospital thrombolysis of a massive pulmonary embolus.大面积肺栓塞的院前溶栓治疗。
Emerg Med J. 2008 May;25(5):303-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.059022.
10
Primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty accelerates early myocardial reperfusion compared to thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction.与溶栓治疗相比，直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术可加速急性心肌梗死患者的早期心肌再灌注。
Am Heart J. 2003 Oct;146(4):686-91. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00326-0.
引用本文的文献
1
Role of thrombolysis in reperfusion therapy for management of AMI: Indian scenario.溶栓在急性心肌梗死再灌注治疗管理中的作用：印度的情况。
Indian Heart J. 2013 Sep-Oct;65(5):566-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2013.08.032. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
本文引用的文献
1
Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a randomised study.急性心肌梗死中直接血管成形术与院前纤维蛋白溶解术的随机研究
Lancet. 2002 Sep 14;360(9336):825-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09963-4.
2
DANAMI-2: is primary angioplasty superior to thrombolysis in acute MI when the patient has to be transferred to an invasive centre?丹麦急性心肌梗死血管成形术与溶栓治疗比较研究-2：当患者必须转至有创治疗中心时，急性心肌梗死患者行直接血管成形术是否优于溶栓治疗？
Int J Cardiol. 2002 Oct;85(2-3):199-201. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(02)00183-3.
3
Outcome after combined reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction, combining pre-hospital thrombolysis with immediate percutaneous coronary intervention and stent.急性心肌梗死联合再灌注治疗的结果，包括院前溶栓与即刻经皮冠状动脉介入治疗及支架置入术相结合。
Eur Heart J. 2001 Jul;22(13):1128-35. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2500.
4
Effects of Abciximab on the architecture of platelet-rich clots in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary intervention.阿昔单抗对接受直接冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者富含血小板血栓结构的影响。
Circulation. 2001 May 15;103(19):2328-31. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.19.2328.
5
Delay in calling for help during myocardial infarction: reasons for the delay and subsequent pattern of accessing care.心肌梗死发作时呼叫急救的延迟：延迟原因及后续就医模式
Heart. 2000 Aug;84(2):137-41. doi: 10.1136/heart.84.2.137.
6
Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死血管成形术患者症状发作至球囊扩张时间及门至球囊扩张时间与死亡率的关系。
JAMA. 2000 Jun 14;283(22):2941-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.22.2941.
7
A comparison of systematic stenting and conventional balloon angioplasty during primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. STENTIM-2 Investigators.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Jun;35(7):1729-36. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00612-4.
8
Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory. The PRAGUE study.多中心随机试验：比较将急性心肌梗死患者转运至进行直接血管成形术、即刻溶栓或联合策略（针对就诊于无导管实验室的社区医院的患者）。PRAGUE研究。
Eur Heart J. 2000 May;21(10):823-31. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1993.
9
A randomized trial comparing primary angioplasty with a strategy of short-acting thrombolysis and immediate planned rescue angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: the PACT trial. PACT investigators. Plasminogen-activator Angioplasty Compatibility Trial.一项在急性心肌梗死中比较直接血管成形术与短效溶栓及即刻计划性补救血管成形术策略的随机试验：PACT试验。PACT研究人员。纤溶酶原激活剂血管成形术相容性试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Dec;34(7):1954-62. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00444-1.
10
A matched comparison of the combination of prehospital thrombolysis and standby rescue angioplasty with primary angioplasty.院前溶栓与备用救援血管成形术联合应用与直接血管成形术的配对比较。
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Feb 1;83(3):305-10. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00858-3.
Zotero 插件