• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺放射治疗中系统设置误差的校正:需要拍摄多少张图像?

Correction of systematic setup errors in prostate radiation therapy: how many images to perform?

作者信息

Ludbrook Joanna J S, Greer Peter B, Blood Paul, D'yachkova Yulia, Coldman Andrew, Beckham Wayne A, Runkel Jim, Olivotto Ivo A

机构信息

Radiation Therapy Program, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver Island Centre, Victoria, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Med Dosim. 2005 Summer;30(2):76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2005.03.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2005.03.003
PMID:15922173
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop an evidence-based off-line setup correction protocol for systematic errors in prostate radiation therapy. Daily orthogonal electronic portal images were acquired from 30 patients. Field displacements were measured in the medial-lateral (ML), superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions for each treatment fraction. The off-line protocol corrects the mean field displacement found from n consecutive images, starting at a particular fraction of treatment, with a fixed tolerance level. Simulations were performed with the measured data to determine (1) how many images (n) should be averaged to determine the systematic error; (2) on which treatment fraction should the protocol be initiated; and (3) what tolerance level should be applied to determine whether the patient position should be corrected. Uncorrected systematic errors in the ML, SI, and AP directions were (mean position +/- 1 standard deviation [SD]): -0.7 +/- 2.2 mm, -1.5 +/- 1.3 mm, and 1.4 +/- 2.6 mm, respectively. Random errors (1 SD and range) were 1.9 mm (1.3 - 3.3), 1.5 mm (0. - 4.1), and 1.8 mm (1.0-2.6), respectively. A correction based on a single image taken on the first fraction actually increased the systematic errors in the ML and SI directions compared with no correction. More accurate correction of systematic errors was achieved with increasing number of images averaged, with only small benefit after 5 images. With fewer images averaged, delaying the start of the protocol resulted in more accurate correction because of the influence of unrepresentative positions at early fractions. The number of corrections made on patients with small (< 2 mm) systematic errors was minimized for tolerance values of 2 mm and n > or = 5 images averaged. The optimal off-line setup correction protocol would be to shift the patient by the mean displacement of the first 5 portal images of a radical course of radiation therapy. A small tolerance level should be utilized with 2 mm giving good accuracy with minimal unnecessary shifts.

摘要

本研究的目的是制定一种基于证据的离线设置校正方案,用于纠正前列腺放射治疗中的系统误差。从30例患者获取每日正交电子门静脉图像。在每个治疗分次中,测量在内外侧(ML)、上下(SI)和前后(AP)方向上的射野位移。离线方案从特定治疗分次开始,以固定的容差水平校正从n个连续图像中发现的平均射野位移。利用测量数据进行模拟,以确定:(1)应平均多少幅图像(n)来确定系统误差;(2)该方案应从哪个治疗分次开始;以及(3)应采用何种容差水平来确定是否应校正患者体位。ML、SI和AP方向上未校正的系统误差分别为(平均位置±1标准差[SD]):-0.7±2.2 mm、-1.5±1.3 mm和1.4±2.6 mm。随机误差(1 SD和范围)分别为1.9 mm(1.3 - 3.3)、1.5 mm(0. - 4.1)和1.8 mm(1.0 - 2.6)。与不校正相比,基于第一次分次拍摄的单幅图像进行校正实际上增加了ML和SI方向上的系统误差。随着平均图像数量的增加,系统误差得到更准确的校正,平均5幅图像后收益甚微。平均图像数量较少时,由于早期分次中位置不具代表性的影响,推迟方案开始时间可实现更准确的校正。对于平均n≥5幅图像且容差值为2 mm的情况,系统误差较小(<2 mm)的患者进行的校正次数最少。最佳的离线设置校正方案是将患者按照根治性放射治疗疗程的前5幅门静脉图像的平均位移进行移动。应采用较小的容差水平,2 mm可提供良好的准确性,且不必要的移动最少。

相似文献

1
Correction of systematic setup errors in prostate radiation therapy: how many images to perform?前列腺放射治疗中系统设置误差的校正:需要拍摄多少张图像?
Med Dosim. 2005 Summer;30(2):76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2005.03.003.
2
Clinical application of a repositioning scheme, using gold markers and electronic portal imaging.一种使用金标记物和电子射野影像的重新定位方案的临床应用
Radiother Oncol. 2006 Apr;79(1):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.03.002. Epub 2006 Apr 3.
3
A treatment planning investigation into the dosimetric effects of systematic prostate patient rotational set-up errors.一项关于系统性前列腺患者旋转摆位误差剂量学影响的治疗计划研究。
Med Dosim. 2008 Autumn;33(3):199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2007.06.005.
4
Off-line setup corrections only marginally reduce the number of on-line corrections for prostate radiotherapy using implanted gold markers.离线设置校正仅能略微减少使用植入金标记物进行前列腺放疗时的在线校正次数。
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Mar;90(3):359-66. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.005. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
5
Set-up errors due to endorectal balloon positioning in intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.前列腺癌调强放射治疗中因直肠内球囊定位导致的摆位误差。
Radiother Oncol. 2007 Aug;84(2):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.06.009. Epub 2007 Aug 13.
6
Interfractional set-up errors evaluation by daily electronic portal imaging of IMRT in head and neck cancer patients.通过对头颈部癌患者进行调强放射治疗的每日电子射野影像来评估分次间摆位误差
Acta Oncol. 2009;48(3):440-5. doi: 10.1080/02841860802400610.
7
Day-to-day reproducibility of prostate intrafraction motion assessed by multiple kV and MV imaging of implanted markers during treatment.治疗期间通过植入标记物的多次千伏和兆伏成像评估前列腺日内运动的重复性。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):400-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.049. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
8
A protocol for the reduction of systematic patient setup errors with minimal portal imaging workload.一种以最小的射野成像工作量减少系统性患者摆位误差的方案。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Aug 1;50(5):1350-65. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01624-8.
9
Proton therapy for prostate cancer treatment employing online image guidance and an action level threshold.采用在线图像引导和行动水平阈值的前列腺癌质子治疗。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr;32(2):180-6. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181841f13.
10
Precision of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) in six degrees of freedom and limitations in clinical practice.六自由度图像引导放射治疗(IGRT)的精度及临床实践中的局限性。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2007 Jun;183(6):307-13. doi: 10.1007/s00066-007-1695-0.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of androgen deprivation therapy on setup errors during external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer.雄激素剥夺疗法对前列腺癌体外放射治疗期间摆位误差的影响。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 Jun;193(6):472-482. doi: 10.1007/s00066-017-1131-z. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
2
Verification of the dose attenuation of a newly developed vacuum cushion for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer.一种新开发的用于前列腺癌调强放射治疗的真空垫剂量衰减验证。
Radiol Phys Technol. 2016 Jul;9(2):270-6. doi: 10.1007/s12194-016-0359-0. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
3
Uncertainty in patient set-up margin analysis in radiation therapy.
放疗中患者摆位误差分析的不确定性。
J Radiat Res. 2012 Jul;53(4):615-9. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrs003. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
4
Impact of the frequency of online verifications on the patient set-up accuracy and set-up margins.在线验证频率对患者摆位准确性和摆位边界的影响。
Radiat Oncol. 2011 Aug 24;6:101. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-101.
5
Consistency in electronic portal imaging registration in prostate cancer radiation treatment verification.前列腺癌放射治疗验证中电子射野影像系统配准的一致性。
Radiat Oncol. 2006 Sep 19;1:37. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-1-37.