Simpson Kathleen Rice, Thorman Kathleen E
St. John's Mercy Medical Center, St. Louis, Mo, USA.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2005 Apr-Jun;19(2):134-44. doi: 10.1097/00005237-200504000-00010.
Common obstetric interventions are often for "convenience" rather than for clinical indications. Before proceeding, it should be clear who is the beneficiary of the convenience. The primary healthcare provider must make sure that women and their partners have a full understanding of what is known about the associated risks, benefits, and alternative approaches of the proposed intervention. Thorough and accurate information allows women to choose what is best for them and their infant on the basis of the individual clinical situation. Ideally, this discussion takes place during the prenatal period when there is ample opportunity to ask questions, reflect on the potential implications, and confer with partners and family members. A review of common obstetric interventions is provided. While these interventions often are medically indicated for the well-being of mothers and infants, the evidence supporting their benefits when used electively is controversial.
常见的产科干预措施往往是出于“便利”而非临床指征。在采取这些措施之前,应该明确谁是这种便利的受益者。初级医疗保健提供者必须确保女性及其伴侣充分了解所提议干预措施的相关风险、益处以及替代方法。全面而准确的信息能让女性根据个人临床情况选择对自己和婴儿最有利的方案。理想情况下,这种讨论应在孕期进行,此时有充足的机会提问、思考潜在影响并与伴侣及家庭成员商议。本文提供了对常见产科干预措施的综述。虽然这些干预措施通常在医学上对母婴健康有益,但支持其选择性使用时益处的证据存在争议。